The Garden of Eden

Originally posted by divegeester
So rather than accept that the tree of life is a symbol of Christ as documented in the book called the Revelation of Jesus Christ, you would rather speculate that either:

- The tree of life is actually dead.

- The tree of life was rescued by god himself and was whisked up to heaven. Presumably the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is there t ...[text shortened]... s of life. Presumably you are one of those who believes there are also 2 Alphas and omegas also.

The lamb is the symbol of Christ in the book of Revelation. I think you are confusing the Tree of Life with the bread and wine of the Eucharist as symbols of the body and blood of Christ.

Originally posted by divegeester
Any comment (other than abuse) on RJHinds augmentation of Galveston's self certified opinion of what happened to the tree of life in the garden of Eden destruction?

there is absolutely no point in engaging you, you simply refuse to answer any question that demonstrate the logical inconsistency of your stance.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
there is absolutely no point in engaging you, you simply refuse to answer any question that demonstrate the logical inconsistency of your stance.

I have given you scripture and rational for my premise relating to the tree of life. Your colleague Galveston has made a claim that is and remains completely unreferenced. As FMF pointed out to you, that you choose not to challenge him on this while browbeating me, is demonstrative of your and his intellectual dishonesty.

Originally posted by RJHinds
The lamb is the symbol of Christ in the book of Revelation. I think you are confusing the Tree of Life with the bread and wine of the Eucharist as symbols of the body and blood of Christ.

You're the one who thinks the tree of life was whisked up into heaven to save it from Noah's flood.

Originally posted by divegeester
I have given you scripture and rational for my premise relating to the tree of life. Your colleague Galveston has made a claim that is and remains completely unreferenced. As FMF pointed out to you, that you choose not to challenge him on this while browbeating me, is demonstrative of your and his intellectual dishonesty.

effhim the unsteady cannot substantiate his meaningless opinions either. R J Hinds of all people asked him what it was allegorical for and look, nada, center of a doughnut, as empty as your region of tundra, zilch, heehaw, nuffin!

Originally posted by divegeester
You're the one who thinks the tree of life was whisked up into heaven to save it from Noah's flood.

I was just speculating on the possiblity. Maybe the cherubim and the flaming sword are still guarding the way to the tree of life after all this time. I don't see the point of fretting over it.

Originally posted by divegeester
And yet you still find time to move in your games presumably hoping your erroneous self certified opinion will be buried under the avalanche of Robbie's head-banging denials.

Are you just an empty mind? It's none of you business when I do my moves or answer on the forums is it? No! But as usual I have to seemingly explain the easy to understand things to you just as I would to a 5 year old.
Making my chess moves is done in just a few miniutes where answering or commenting on the forums takes longer especially to you as you can't seem to understand a normal answer and it takes me longer to deal with you. Get it?
The more you comment is the harder to believe you are for real..... You have to be playing dumb, I hope.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I was just speculating on the possiblity. Maybe the cherubim and the flaming sword are still guarding the way to the tree of life after all this time. I don't see the point of fretting over it.

Yeah your right on that point. He seems to grab on to something and beat it to death and without even trying to understand it or if all else fails, pray to God for the answer as none of us can seem to satisfy his banter.

So the point is the bible does not say what happened to the garden of Eden or anything in it. So with that Garden being created by God himself, it was perfect. Some trees alive on the earth today are many hundreds of years old. So it is not beyond the possibilty that this perfect garden and all the plant life in it, including the trees' could have lived for hundreds of years and possibly even to the flood which was some 2000+ years from Adam's creation.

Originally posted by galveston75
Are you just an empty mind? It's none of you business when I do my moves or answer on the forums is it? No! But as usual I have to seemingly explain the easy to understand things to you just as I would to a 5 year old.
Making my chess moves is done in just a few miniutes where answering or commenting on the forums takes longer especially to you as you ...[text shortened]... you comment is the harder to believe you are for real..... You have to be playing dumb, I hope.

Of course I don't care what you do and when; except that you have made biblical claims in this thread that you are unable to substantiate and you refuse to admit that they are of your "self certified opinion" (robbie carrobie TM). Your inability to admit when you are wrong is a revealling aspect of yours and robbie carrobie's mind-set and I will persue you on it, especially when I think you are being dishonest.

When you try to cover for this intellectual dishonesty by pretending that you are too busy to post (as you have done on previous occasions) then I'm going to call you on it. It is a trademark lack of forum etiquette that we have seen from you repeatedly and for which you were called out for in the "forum etiquette" thread and on other occasions and no doubt you will be called out for in future.

Originally posted by divegeester
Of course I don't care what you do and when; except that you have made biblical claims in this thread that you are unable to substantiate and you refuse to admit that they are of your "self certified opinion" (robbie carrobie TM). Your inability to admit when you are wrong is a revealling aspect of yours and robbie carrobie's mind-set and I will persue ...[text shortened]... orum etiquette" thread and on other occasions and no doubt you will be called out for in future.

stalking the Gman again? wow can we expect any lewd comments with regard to the time he spends looking after his aging parents from you?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
stalking the Gman again? wow can we expect any lewd comments with regard to the time he spends looking after his aging parents from you?

This is a debating forum robbie, if people are dishonest in debate they get called on it. Galveston is known to have a poor forum etiquette and as he was engaging me in my thread, I feel I have a right to point this out.

If you don't like it you are welcome to again complain about me to the admins or Galveston is free to "leave the site forever" once again. The previous complaints were not upheld and Galveston is back again posting so I doubt your childish hand-flapping and finger-pointing will come to anything.

Originally posted by divegeester
This is a debating forum robbie, if people are dishonest in debate they get called on it. Galveston is known to have a poor forum etiquette and as he was engaging me in my thread, I feel I have a right to point this out.

If you don't like it you are welcome to again complain about me to the admins or Galveston is free to "leave the site forever" once ...[text shortened]... again posting so I doubt your childish hand-flapping and finger-pointing will come to anything.

Its not about Galvedton its about you harrasing him and making references to when he moves with what frequency which some may construe as stalking and making lewd comments on the time he spends here, looking after his parents or anything else because its none of your business. How that contributes to the debate here I cannot say but personally I find your forumn etiquette to be far more reprehensible than the Gman because the substance of your posts almost entirely focuses on personality rather than the issues at hand so I will be pleased if you spare me a lecture no one will be taking lessons in etiquette from you for your hypocrisy is branded upon almost every post you make.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
...and making lewd comments on the time he spends here...

"Lewd comments [to Galveston] on the time he spends here"

Can you please quote one of these as I would like to apologise.

Many thanks.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its not about Galvedton its about you harrasing him and making references to when he moves with what frequency which some may construe as stalking and making lewd comments on the time he spends here, looking after his parents or anything else because its none of your business. How that contributes to the debate here I cannot say but personally I fin ...[text shortened]... ing lessons in etiquette from you for your hypocrisy is branded upon almost every post you make.

I think you need to get out a bit more Robert.

Originally posted by divegeester
"Lewd comments [to Galveston] on the time he spends here"

Can you please quote one of these as I would like to apologise.

Many thanks.

Yes you have in the past used the trying situation of having to look after ones aging parents and concocted insinuations from that trying circumstance..... so now you have said it why don't you man up and apologise?