The problems with Christidelphians

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
oh but that lens is available to us, through a book, which has been preserved for thousands of years. the whole point of blood sacrifices were representative of life. this pointed towards the perfect life that Adam had forfeited, bringing imperfection into the world. These blood sacrifices created an environment, in which the understanding of the ...[text shortened]... tandards of righteousness and justice, 'buying' back, that perfect life, which Adam had lost.

Your desire to keep yourself and Christianity rooted in the 1st century is lamentable. It grieves me that you would so willingly buy into such a ridiculous fantasy. Blood sacrifices? Come on, how far removed is that from throwing virgins into the volcano?

Originally posted by rwingett
Your desire to keep yourself and Christianity rooted in the 1st century is lamentable. It grieves me that you would so willingly buy into such a ridiculous fantasy. Blood sacrifices? Come on, how far removed is that from throwing virgins into the volcano?

not so my friend, for after the first century, it became corrupted with Greek Hellenism and philosophy, that is why they are debating the trinity at this very moment. One must understand the reason behind the sacrifices. A human sacrifice was not lawful, for only God had the right as life giver to take another human life, except in the cases of murder. Animal sacrifices were merely representative of the messiahs ultimate sacrifice, and this would have been impressed upon the Israelites from the poorest peasant, up to the high priest and the King.

Disclaimer: All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. All references may or may not be from a third party, the author claims no responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i am at perfect liberty, as an ordained member of Jehovahs witnesses to use the literature, produced by Jehovahs witness, for furtherance of the good news as is deemed necessary. You are too much of a big mouth to know that! that its why it is printed! We pay for, author, print and distribute the literature, ourselves. If it grieves you that i do ...[text shortened]... o responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work![/b]

If the text is in fact the intellectual property of the JW and you have permission to publish it, then you are not a thief. However, by publishing the text without acknowledging the source in effect takes credit for authorship and shows a lack of character. You are not the author and therefore are a plagiarist.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
in fact this article has been copied from the watchtower of 1962, August the 1st pages 473-478, of which we as Jehovahs Witnesses have in our reference work, the watchtower library. The copyright remains the property of The Watchtower and Bible tract society of Pennsylvania incorporated.

Just a tad late...

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Just a tad late...

You shall notice of course that rather than addressing the content of the text, as the noble badwater, rwingett dude and yourself have done, he must resort to these type of insinuations. He was wrong about the source, he was wrong about the motive and likes to scandalise and slander another's reputation with them. We shall let him be with his mud pies and slinging them for we have more pressing matters to attend to than his sensationalistic journalism!




Disclaimer: All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. All references may or may not be from a third party, the author claims no responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work!

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
If the text is in fact the intellectual property of the JW and you have permission to publish it, then you are not a thief. However, by publishing the text without acknowledging the source in effect takes credit for authorship and shows a lack of character. You are not the author and therefore are a plagiarist.

did i claim to be the author? no, where did i claim to be the author? nowhere. was my intention to paint myself as the author, nope and to claim that i authored the text, nope! take a look at it for goodness sake, you can tell its a cut and paste a mile off! i am not citing references for mud slingers like you for you dont know where to get off. dont like the text, dont read it! simple as that!




Disclaimer: All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. All references may or may not be from a third party, the author claims no responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You shall notice of course that rather than addressing the content of the text, as the noble badwater, rwingett dude and yourself have done, he must resort to these type of insinuations. He was wrong about the source, he was wrong about the motive and likes to scandalise and slander another's reputation with them. We shall let him be with his mud p ...[text shortened]... s no responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work!

You really are a clown.

Look at all these false assertions in this one post:

There is no "insinuation". I'm coming right out and calling you what you are - a plagiarist. This has been proven beyond all doubt.

I wasn't "wrong about the source". I pointed out a place where the probable plagiarized text was published on the web.

I wasn't "wrong about the motive". You seem to be unable to make a distinction between your motive for starting a thread about Christidelphians and your motive for plagiarizing your material.

There is no "slander". You ARE a plagiarist.

That you have so little moral fiber so as to continue your name calling rather than admit your transgression is truly remarkable.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
did i claim to be the author? no, where did i claim to be the author? nowhere. was my intention to paint myself as the author, nope and to claim that i authored the text, nope! take a look at it for goodness sake, you can tell its a cut and paste a mile off! i am not citing references for mud slingers like you for you dont know where to get off. ...[text shortened]... ms no responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work!

I never said that you overtly claimed to be the author.

Is your reading comprehension so poor that you didn't understand this?:
"However, by publishing the text without acknowledging the source in effect takes credit for authorship and shows a lack of character."

It's really simple. Just cite your sources when publishing text that you didn't author. Instead you continue to childishly refuse to take responsibility for your actions.

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
I never said that you overtly claimed to be the author.

Is your reading comprehension so poor that you didn't understand this?:
"However, [b]by publishing the text without acknowledging the source in effect takes credit for authorship and shows a lack of character."

It's really simple. Just cite your sources when publishing text that you didn't author. Instead you continue to childishly refuse to take responsibility for your actions.[/b]

look this thread is about Christidelphians and inadvertently trying to get Raj involved in a ruse, if you have anything to contribute to that topic, then please do, otherwise please bake your cyber mud pies elsewhere, for as yet, you have posted how many posts and said nothing about the actual topic. No i cannot find one little comment about the actual content, not an utterance. why is that? have you no interest in the topic, then why do you post here? If mudslinging appeals to you, go to the pond and rummage around the periphery, i am sure they have some real quality mud for your mud pies there! if that doesnt appeal to you, go to the farmyard, they have some ready made cow pies that would suit a nin cow poop like yourself! you can have great fun throwing them!


i am citing nothing for you! get it, nothing! if you dont like it, sue me!


Disclaimer: All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. All references may or may not be from a third party, the author claims no responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work!

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
You really are a clown.

Look at all these false assertions in this one post:

There is no "insinuation". I'm coming right out and calling you what you are - a plagiarist. This has been proven beyond all doubt.

I wasn't "wrong about the source". I pointed out a place where the probable plagiarized text was published on the web.

I wasn't "wrong ...[text shortened]... continue your name calling rather than admit your transgression is truly remarkable.

i say we test your honesty and integrity of character, those qualities which you seem to like pointing out are deficient in others, shall we?

are you a sinner or are you not!

please answer the question honestly and with integrity of character, so that the forum can bear witness to your honesty and integrity, i repeat, are you a sinner or are you not? here an opportunity to establish your honesty and your integrity. best of luck !

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
look this thread is about Christidelphians and inadvertently trying to get Raj involved in a ruse, if you have anything to contribute to that topic, then please do, otherwise please bake your cyber mud pies elsewhere, for as yet, you have posted how many posts and said nothing about the actual topic. No i cannot find one little comment about the actu ...[text shortened]... ms no responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work!

"...inadvertently trying to get Raj involved in a ruse..."? Inadvertently? From what you posted earlier, it sounded like that was the primary purpose for starting of your thread. Why do you choose to live in denial? You live in denial about your plagiarism. Now, it seems you are denying the primary purpose for starting this thread.

Seems to me that the teachings of Jesus is about truth. That God is truth. If you are living in denial you are living apart from truth. You are living apart from God. You should really consider this.

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
"...inadvertently trying to get Raj involved in a ruse..."? Inadvertently? From what you posted earlier, it sounded like that was the primary purpose for starting of your thread. Why do you choose to live in denial? You live in denial about your plagiarism. Now, it seems you are denying the primary purpose for starting this thread.

Seems to me that the ...[text shortened]... u are living apart from truth. You are living apart from God. You should really consider this.

we are waiting for you to establish your own honesty and integrity, if you please!

oops almost forgot my disclaimer, cant be too careful these days, lots of pedantic cyper post policeman who like to go through your posts to see if you cite every reference. ahh yes, here it is.



Disclaimer: All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. All references may or may not be from a third party, the author claims no responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
...Galvo was rather amazed that you were not taking your usual stance against us, but were siding against the trinitarians.

....

I am not affiliated to any religious organisation and I attack what I consider to be wrong doctrines or principles. So its nothing personal.

Originally posted by Rajk999
I am not affiliated to any religious organisation and I attack what I consider to be wrong doctrines or principles. So its nothing personal.

yes but i remember way back when i first came here, you had some affiliation with christidelphians, at least i think it was you, but that you disagreed with some of their teachings, thus this thread!



Disclaimer: All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. All references may or may not be from a third party, the author claims no responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
we are waiting for you to establish your own honesty and integrity, if you please!

oops almost forgot my disclaimer, cant be too careful these days, lots of pedantic cyper post policeman who like to go through your posts to see if you cite every reference. ahh yes, here it is.



Disclaimer: All characters appearing in this work are fictitio ...[text shortened]... ms no responsibility for the content, nor are any to be taken as representative of his own work!

Here we have a common ploy employed by those living in denial. Rather than face what they are denying, they try to put the focus on someone else in an attempt to avoid the truth. And yet God is truth. It is the light of truth that you avoid.

Perhaps this will help you to overcome your aversion to truth:

John 12:35-36
So Jesus said to them, “For a little while longer the Light is among you. Walk while you have the Light, so that darkness will not overtake you; he who walks in the darkness does not know where he goes. 36 “While you have the Light, believe in the Light, so that you may become sons of Light.”

Seek the light Robbie. Seek the truth. The truth will set you free.