Originally posted by DasaThe theory of the puddle and the lightning bolt, has been taugh as just that,a theory. There is some evidence for this but noone has taugh it as fact. Constrast this with your "theory" based on some book that came from where. Was this book found in some swamp or what.
Game over.
Originally posted by RJHindsTry reading the link and you will see that several hypotheses are put forward.
FMF this theory of the soup was out there when I was going through
school in the late 1950's and early 1960's at least. It could have been
before this, but that is the time period that I remember hearing about it.
P.S. I found something on it.
The "Primordial soup" theory is described in the Wikipedia article Abiogenesis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
Nobody knows (yet)
Nobody claims to know.
Originally posted by deennyRight, it is the same as the theory of evolution, not fact, just theory.
The theory of the puddle and the lightning bolt, has been taugh as just that,a theory. There is some evidence for this but noone has taugh it as fact. Constrast this with your "theory" based on some book that came from where. Was this book found in some swamp or what.
Originally posted by RJHindsevolution is an applied theory. as in it's based on factual evidence which is applied in real world practices. most of modern medicine depends on the theory of evolution being mostly correct.
Right, it is the same as the theory of evolution, not fact, just theory.
when was the last time magic cured anyone?
Originally posted by VoidSpiritWhy then do many medical doctors not believe in evolution then?
evolution is an applied theory. as in it's based on factual evidence which is applied in real world practices. most of modern medicine depends on the theory of evolution being mostly correct.
when was the last time magic cured anyone?
Originally posted by VoidSpiritSo I guess evolutionists are the only ones allowed to have beliefs. Okay.
i don't know that many medical doctors don't believe in evolution theory. perhaps there are a few. their beliefs are irrelevant however, as are all beliefs. beliefs do not change the facts stated above.
Originally posted by RJHindsthere is applied theory and there is speculative theory. abiogenesis is a speculative theory. evolution theory on the other hand is applied positively, reliably and consistently in the real world despite your ignorance of the subject.
So I guess evolutionists are the only ones allowed to have beliefs. Okay.
your beliefs or anyone's beliefs on it are completely irrelevant.
21 Dec 11
Originally posted by VoidSpiritThat's right because there is no evolution. So believeing in it is fruitless.
there is applied theory and there is speculative theory. abiogenesis is a speculative theory. evolution theory on the other hand is applied positively, reliably and consistently in the real world despite your ignorance of the subject.
your beliefs or anyone's beliefs on it are completely irrelevant.
21 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsyou are a great man knowing there is no evolution. We are finding out new things every day and they mostly point in the direction of evolution. What we know now would certainly not lead one to made the bold statement that there is no evolution.
That's right because there is no evolution. So believeing in it is fruitless.
And when new facts emerge there is no saying that we believed something different last week so this cannot be true. Unlike these holy books that have appeared from who knows where. People who swear by the words of the holy books should learn to question them. The truth can stand up to questions
Originally posted by deennyWhen I was a young man with little knowledge or wisdom I questioned
you are a great man knowing there is no evolution. We are finding out new things every day and they mostly point in the direction of evolution. What we know now would certainly not lead one to made the bold statement that there is no evolution.
And when new facts emerge there is no saying that we believed something different last week so this cannot be true ...[text shortened]... y the words of the holy books should learn to question them. The truth can stand up to questions
the Holy Bible because I thought I was smart. Today, I realize how
stupid I was then. The people who believe in evolution have not come
to the point of realizing how stupid they are yet. They still think they
are smart.
Originally posted by RJHindsHave you any other reason for dismissing evolution other than your smartness
When I was a young man with little knowledge or wisdom I questioned
the Holy Bible because I thought I was smart. Today, I realize how
stupid I was then. The people who believe in evolution have not come
to the point of realizing how stupid they are yet. They still think they
are smart.
Originally posted by RJHindsWell, now you are an OLD man with little knowledge or wisdom...😉
When I was a young man with little knowledge or wisdom I questioned
the Holy Bible because I thought I was smart. Today, I realize how
stupid I was then. The people who believe in evolution have not come
to the point of realizing how stupid they are yet. They still think they
are smart.
Why make such a broad statemnt? Loads of people who believe in evolution are very smart. Even if they are not right, at least they are trying to figure things out instead of blindly following a magical book full of floods, destruction, self-multiplying bread and fish, people who get weaker when their hair gets cut, people walikng on water, and the origin of the black man being due to an ancient murder... I could go on, but you probably stopped reading since I didn't include any pictures.