10 May 05
Originally posted by ColettiI see. So, one person's observation of something is sufficient for that something to be a fact?
It has been observed and measured - pr oven mathematically.
How do you apply this to the contradictory Gospels, whose observations yield different conclusions about the stone and the angels at the tomb? Is each contradictory account factual by virtue of the observations reported therein?
If a deaf person goes to a rock concert and reports that he observed no sound, does that mean the band didn't play?
10 May 05
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesGive me a break Mr. Scribbly. You know what I am saying. You know very well that the thoughts and the beliefs of Nemiseo are more against the poster than what is posted. I chastise him because of his hypocrisies, simple as that.
Why do you chastise Nemesio instead of Coletti.
Coletti is the one who claims that God's existence is a fact, not Nemesio.
RTh
10 May 05
Originally posted by RingtailhunterIs Coletti right or wrong when he claims that God's existence is a fact?
Give me a break Mr. Scribbly. You know what I am saying. You know very well that the thoughts and the beliefs of Nemiseo are more against the poster than what is posted. I chastise him because of his hypocrisies, simple as that.
RTh
10 May 05
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesYou know very well it is not fact. As I have stated, it is faith. My issue is with the false stature of an otherwise decent person (I believe, as with you) about knocking the beliefs of others.
Is Coletti right or wrong when he claims that God's existence is a fact?
You also cannot prove your end.
RTh
10 May 05
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesI'm saying that "existences" is irrelevant. God exists. The question should is whether a particular definition of God is real or imaginary.
Why do you chastise Nemesio instead of Coletti.
Coletti is the one who claims that God's existence is a fact, not Nemesio.
Unicorns exist. Mars exists. Plant X which has never been observed by human minds exists. All things exists that can be defined either as real or hypothetical. The question is not is does thing A exist. The question is, is the definition of thing A true.
Saying God exists is nothing more than saying that a particular definition of God is true.
10 May 05
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesWhat do you want me to say.......what is fact to him, and what is not? I know there have been plenty of people who have died because they have faith, but I don't know of one person who has died because they believe in a fact.....do you?
Do you think Coletti knows very well that it is not a fact?
Rediculouse question.
RTh