Go back
What is this

What is this "God"?

Spirituality

N

The sky

Joined
05 Apr 05
Moves
10385
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Quoting Conrau K from page 1, as some people seem to have missed that: "Appears to me an entirely christian God. What would define God in general. What do pagan Gods have in common with christian Gods?"

t
True X X Xian

The Lord's Army

Joined
18 Jul 04
Moves
8353
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Frantically google-searching.
When you get that one go to "proof by contradiction." Then you will understand why I can be certain that no proof exists showing that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is a rational number.

EAPOE
Earl of Rochester

Restoration London

Joined
22 Dec 05
Moves
7135
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

God omnipotent and all forgiving allows children in africa to have their eyes eaten out by worms from the water they drink before they are old enough to have the language to be able to describe what they see.

g
it's mine

manchester, england

Joined
26 Jan 06
Moves
22939
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dj2becker
John 4:24 - God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

John 6:33 - For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world.

Romans 1:18 - For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

...[text shortened]... e are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.
this bible must be old. hath hath hath thou

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bbarr
Haven't you heard? The atheist is committed to the claim that the universe came from nothing. From nothing! 😲

But, as everyone knows, nothing comes from nothing, because everything that exists has to have a cause!

Except God, He doesn't have to have a cause! Hooray for God!

[Refute at your leisure.]
So you have left the atheist with two possibilities. Either matter is its own uncaused cause (absurd) or there exists some other uncaused cause enacting agent (probability-wise more logical). The atheist chooses the absurd over the logical.
Hooray for the atheist!

bbarr
Chief Justice

Center of Contention

Joined
14 Jun 02
Moves
17381
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
So you have left the atheist with two possibilities. Either matter is its own uncaused cause (absurd) or there exists some other uncaused cause enacting agent (probability-wise more logical). The atheist chooses the absurd over the logical.
Hooray for the atheist!
Or the atheist says the universe was uncaused, and doesn't have a beginning.

S

Joined
19 Nov 03
Moves
31382
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Tell you what: I'll list the standards by which these types of claims can be measured, and you tell us which of the list are arbitrary.
Are you going to post this or just drivel nonsense about what you think is entailed in the stance of the atheist ?

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
12 Mar 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
Lol, what? Perhaps you'd care to justify such a ludicrous claim.

EDIT: And are you going to post that list?
Here's an outline of historiography, courtesy of Wikipedia.

Some of the common questions of historiography are:
Who wrote the source (primary or secondary)?
For primary sources, we look at the person in his or her society, for secondary sources, we consider the theoretical orientation of the approach.
What is the authenticity, authority, bias/interest, and intelligibility of the source?
What was the view of history when the source was written?
Was history supposed to provide moral lessons?
What or who was the intended audience?
What sources were privileged or ignored in the narrative?
By what method was the evidence compiled?
In what historical context was the work of history itself written?

Issues engaged in so-called critical historiography includes topics such as:
What constitutes an historical "event"?
In what modes does a historian write and produce statements of "truth" and "fact"?
How does the medium (novel, textbook, film, theatre, comic) through which historical information is conveyed influence its meaning?
What inherent epistemological problems does archive-based history contain?
How does the historian establish their own objectivity or come to terms with their own subjectivity?
What is the relation of historical theory to historical practice?
What is the "goal" of history?
What is history?

Under this discipline, three principles emerge which can be used as the standard of ascertaining veracity.
1. Bibliographical test
2. Internal evidence test
3. External evidence test

Please inform me which of the above factors are arbitrary and should thus be removed.

H
I stink, ergo I am

On the rebound

Joined
14 Jul 05
Moves
4464
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bbarr
Or the atheist says the universe was uncaused, and doesn't have a beginning.
Which science seems to have a problem with.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bbarr
Or the atheist says the universe was uncaused, and doesn't have a beginning.
In essence, the same thing. Either it caused itself, or it always was. So either God is God, or matter is God.

R

Joined
25 Oct 05
Moves
4084
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
So you have left the atheist with two possibilities. Either matter is its own uncaused cause (absurd) or there exists some other uncaused cause enacting agent (probability-wise more logical). The atheist chooses the absurd over the logical.
Hooray for the atheist!
"Either matter is its own uncaused cause (absurd)"

hence god is absurd. as god doesn't have to have a cause to be, he is by your own logic "absurd".

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
Are you going to post this or just drivel nonsense about what you think is entailed in the stance of the atheist ?
The atheist believes something other that what I've presented?

S

Joined
19 Nov 03
Moves
31382
Clock
12 Mar 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
The atheist believes something other that what I've presented?
Atheism is not a state of belief.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
Atheism is not a state of belief.
The word ‘atheism’ comes from the negative ‘a’ which means ‘no’ and ‘theos’ which means ‘god.’ Hence, atheism in the most base terms means ‘no god.’ Basically, atheism is the lack of belief in a god and/or the belief that there is no god.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
12 Mar 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Rolfey
"Either matter is its own uncaused cause (absurd)"

hence god is absurd. as god doesn't have to have a cause to be, he is by your own logic "absurd".
God, not being matter--- moreover, being outside of matter--- does not, therefore, require a cause.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.