Originally posted by FMFWe are no longer under the mandates of the Law, it was specific to Jewish people, we are Christians. Gods Laws were only binding upon Jews, therefore your designation of slavery as practised by others, i.e, the Romans has no legitimacy here, therefore you need to be specific where you re talking of slavery, for its not slavery in any generic sense.
Permitted in the same way as it was permitted by your version of God in OT times?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAre followers of your God permitted to have slaves?
Gods Laws were only binding upon Jews, therefore your designation of slavery as practised by others, i.e, the Romans has no legitimacy here, therefore you need to be specific where you re talking of slavery, for its not slavery in any generic sense.
Originally posted by FMFI have provided the Bibles viewpoint you may come to your own conclusions. Certainly there were first century Christians who owned slaves. Its rather unlikely now as social conditions have changed, as pointed out in the article that I provided.
Are followers of your God permitted to have slaves?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt is "change". Change in the "law" that applies to His followers, change in several of the "principles" that underpinned them, and a move from an Old to a New Covenant is clearly a change in His "way" too. galveston75's claim that these things never change is nonsense.
no, its the end of one agreement and the beginning of another.
Originally posted by FMFthe Law did not change it was fulfilled, your assertions to the contrary are nonsense.
It is "change". Change in the "law" that applies to His followers, change in several of the "principles" that underpinned them, and a move from an Old to a New Covenant is clearly a change in His "way" too. galveston75's claim that these things never change is nonsense.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou often talk about first century Christians as a benchmark for your own practice of Christianity. How does it apply to slavery? Social conditions aside, are you, as a follower of your God, permitted to have slaves in the same way as followers like you were permitted to own them in OT times and in first century times?
Certainly there were first century Christians who owned slaves. Its rather unlikely now as social conditions have changed, as pointed out in the article that I provided.
Originally posted by FMFSlavery as far as i am aware is outlawed in the UK, as a Christian, one would of course be compelled to subject oneself to the superior authorities (governments), therefore here it would be quite impossible to own a slave. Where does one buy a salve, ebay? amazon? the local slave market?
You often talk about first century Christians as a benchmark for your own practice of Christianity. How does it apply to slavery? Social conditions aside, are you, as a follower of your God, permitted to have slaves in the same way as followers like you were permitted to own them in OT times and in first century times?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis is an answer to a different question - something along of the lines of 'is slavery legal in the U.K.?' I am asking you are you permitted to own slaves by the version of God you follow?
Slavery as far as i am aware is outlawed in the UK, as a Christian, one would of course be compelled to subject oneself to the superior authorities (governments), therefore here it would be quite impossible to own a slave.
Originally posted by FMFI have already told you i am under duress to observe the laws of the UK therefore it is not permitted for me, as a Christian living here to own a slave.
This is an answer to a different question - something along of the lines of 'is slavery legal in the U.K.?' I am asking you are you permitted to own slaves by the version of God you follow?