- Joined
- 23 Jul 05
- Moves
- 8869
11 Dec 05
Originally posted by telerionHow droll, do you think people who don't believe in God or Jesus for that matter are immoral, evil sinning perverts? If so your ignorance is astounding, most atheists are nice people.
Do not blame God because you like darkness and boobies so much.
11 Dec 05
Originally posted by Bad wolfmost atheists are nice people.
How droll, do you think people who don't believe in God or Jesus for that matter are immoral, evil sinning perverts? If so your ignorance is astounding, most atheists are nice people.
Except Stalin, Idi Amin, Castro, Pol Pot and Genghis Khan. 😀😀😀
11 Dec 05
1 edit
Originally posted by HalitoseDon't know about the others, but Idi Amin was a Muslim and Genghis Khan believed he was anointed by God to rule the world. If you're going to engage in this type chainjerking, you should try to be somewhat factually accurate. After all, a fire protects its source.
[b]most atheists are nice people.
Except Stalin, Idi Amin, Castro, Pol Pot and Genghis Khan. 😀😀😀[/b]
11 Dec 05
Originally posted by no1marauderThe factual incorrectness was part of the chainjerking - nothing can rub one up more than a false accusation.
Don't know about the others, but Idi Amin was a Muslim and Genghis Khan believed he was anointed by God to rule the world. If you're going to engage in this type chainjerking, you should try to be somewhat factually accurate. After all, a fire protects its source.
11 Dec 05
Originally posted by HalitoseIm sure there have been more nasty religous people in history then atheists. you appear to have a bit of an anti communist thing going on there
[b]most atheists are nice people.
Except Stalin, Idi Amin, Castro, Pol Pot and Genghis Khan. 😀😀😀[/b]
11 Dec 05
Originally posted by no1marauderWhats this about a fire?
Don't know about the others, but Idi Amin was a Muslim and Genghis Khan believed he was anointed by God to rule the world. If you're going to engage in this type chainjerking, you should try to be somewhat factually accurate. After all, a fire protects its source.
11 Dec 05
Originally posted by Will EverittAtheism is mostly a recent phenomenon; hence your sample for such a statistic would be biased. And yes, I'm not too fond of the commies.
Im sure there have been more nasty religous people in history then atheists. you appear to have a bit of an anti communist thing going on there
11 Dec 05
Originally posted by no1marauderSo fire protects the match box or lighter?!! Sounds crazy to me.
Don't know about the others, but Idi Amin was a Muslim and Genghis Khan believed he was anointed by God to rule the world. If you're going to engage in this type chainjerking, you should try to be somewhat factually accurate. After all, a fire protects its source.
11 Dec 05
Originally posted by HalitoseYou have to admit thought that religion is the basis for many wars.
Atheism is mostly a recent phenomenon; hence your sample for such a statistic would be biased. And yes, I'm not too fond of the commies.
makes me want to burst into song
Brother will kill brother
Spilling blood across the land
Killing for religion
Something I don’t understand
Fools like me,who cross the sea
And come to foreign lands
Ask the sheep,for their beliefs
Do you kill on god’s command?
A country that’s divided
Surely will not stand
My past erased,no more disgrace
No foolish naive stand...
11 Dec 05
Originally posted by Bad wolfWe are all wicked, fallen creatures, unworthy of breath since the moment we were babes. That's why we all need Jesus' precious blood to cover us so that we may be spared judgement. You see, we were created to have fellowship with God. He grew tired of the Void and thought humans would make good chatting partners. That means we are all the most precious and valuable jewels of Creation.
How droll, do you think people who don't believe in God or Jesus for that matter are immoral, evil sinning perverts? If so your ignorance is astounding, most atheists are nice people.
Make sense?
- Joined
- 23 Jul 05
- Moves
- 8869
11 Dec 05
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesThe dictionary defines virtuous to be:
But not virtuous. According to lucifershammer, it is impossible for an atheist to be virtuous.
1. Having or showing virtue, especially moral excellence: led a virtuous life.
2. Possessing or characterized by chastity; pure: a virtuous woman.
I somewhat disagree with you because the dictionary definition states someone virtuous has moral excellence, I don't believe not believing in God is immoral and assuming someone leaves a good and morally good life I don't see why an atheist can't be virtuous.
Could you explain your post a bit more, explaining why it would be impossible and quote what lucifershammer said and also give me the source so I understand your perspective better.