Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYou and your atheist pals and the atheists’ fanboy have repeatedly been trying to run me down without addressing me directly so naturally I’m responding.
Right beside you sir, as will everybody else I'm sure who is sick of that tedious little troll.
Like yourself I have not responded to him directly in over 2 weeks, but he still replies to virtually every post I make to other posters. What kind of saddo does that?
But more to the point, is this post of yours a substantive post or a trolling post? Does it represent the advancement of a substantive discussion or spamming?
-Removed-Well, so far you’ve got a Christ denier and atheist backing you. Shockah!
Clearly my observation of your behavior and reason for it struck a nerve. You’ve been blubbering about this for hours.
You exclusively pick nits with and attack believers.
You ignore abusive posts and trolling by atheists and Christ deniers.
I cannot think of a single believer and frequent poster in here whom you do not regularly attack.
I cannot think of a single atheist or Christ denier in here you ever criticize.
Why is that?
It’s clear you and the atheist trolls are trying to pit believers against each other and get me banned from the forum to boot.
Why?
If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out. I never start anything; I just finish it.
As I once said many moons ago on here, “Trolls are the disease. And I’m the cure.”
Originally posted by @fmfThe joke is he claims he makes substantive posts while simultaneously boasting:
You are just being "trolled" that's all. I doubt there are many Christians here who have the appetite to become the target of similar "very amusing" invective. So I expect most to keep schtum. I hope I am proved wrong.
"Thread Killer promises to be more on the ball next week - and return to his glory days of being the last poster in 24 out of the first 25 threads!"
Which, in reality, means he will spam every thread in sight with juvenile trolling about sandwiches and pool whizzing and abusing personal information shared by other users.
Pathetic.
20 May 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeIs this yet another trolling post by you? Slow down, Heartpence. You can’t troll like a young ‘un the way you used to.
The joke is he claims he makes substantive posts while simultaneously boasting:
"Thread Killer promises to be more on the ball next week - and return to his glory days of being the last poster in 24 out of the first 25 threads!"
Which, in reality, means he will spam every thread in sight with juvenile trolling about sandwiches and pool whizzing and abusing personal information shared by other users.
Pathetic.
And you’re still recovering from all those pratfalls when you tried to post substance.
20 May 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeI said tiger was ashamed to *believe in* Jesus Christ. Is your misrepresentation of what I said another example of your deceitfulness?
3 in support sir (including FMF).
For an alleged Christian to suggest you are ashamed of Jesus is profoundly warped. (And says more about his own understanding of Christ).
20 May 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeDid FMF give his support? Didn’t seem like it. But Kiddo may be confused after yet another OCD- and ADHD-fueled posting bender.
3 in support sir (including FMF).
For an alleged Christian to suggest you are ashamed of Jesus is profoundly warped. (And says more about his own understanding of Christ).
Originally posted by @fmfBack in the 70's some of us used the word (pronounced schtum) but spelled Xtum. For us it was when (in a group setting) someone would ask a question of the group and it was met with total silence.
You are just being "trolled" that's all. I doubt there are many Christians here who have the appetite to become the target of similar "very amusing" invective. So I expect most to keep schtum. I hope I am proved wrong.