Why is RJH still here?

Originally posted by FMF
But you have been exposed as a cheat. A promise you may or may not have made to a poster called Zygalski is irrelevant. Zygalski's decision, which you accepted, was "The analysis indicates idiotic engine use". In view of this, isn't it just sheer gall on your part to remain here?

I was not exposed as a cheat. It was only believed by some. There was no
absolute proof, only accusations and speculations. And as kingshill pointed
out if this 60+% matchup rate was proof of cheating then nearly everyone
that I played against must have been cheating too. I lost several of those
games and had some draws too.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I was not exposed as a cheat. It was only believed by some. There was no
absolute proof, only accusations and speculations. And as kingshill pointed
out if this 60+% matchup rate was proof of cheating then nearly everyone
that I played against must have been cheating too. I lost several of those
games and had some draws too.

Answer this question with a 'yes' or a 'no'. (Failure to do so will put you in my book as an engine user. Period)

Have you, on any games, used a chess engine with your games here at rhp?

Originally posted by RJHinds
I was not exposed as a cheat. It was only believed by some. There was no
absolute proof, only accusations and speculations. And as kingshill pointed
out if this 60+% matchup rate was proof of cheating then nearly everyone
that I played against must have been cheating too. I lost several of those
games and had some draws too.

so there is a nest of vipers, dude, you could not explain a single motif in any of your
games although called to do so, no not a single strategic idea could you muster. In fact
all you could state in your defence was, its because of those Jehovah's Witnesses and
its because i dont believe in evolution that I am being accused. Is it because of
Jehovah's Witnesses and the fact that you dont believe in evolution that you have
greater move to engine choice ratio's that the correspondence world champion and the
present highest rated chess player in the world , Magnus Carlsen? Well, is it?

Originally posted by karoly aczel
Answer this question with a 'yes' or a 'no'. (Failure to do so will put you in my book as an engine user. Period)

Have you, on any games, used a chess engine with your games here at rhp?

No.

Originally posted by RJHinds
No.

you'll be smokin like a a Loch Fine kipper for that RJH

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
so there is a nest of vipers, dude, you could not explain a single motif in any of your
games although called to do so, no not a single strategic idea could you muster. In fact
all you could state in your defence was, its because of those Jehovah's Witnesses and
its because i dont believe in evolution that I am being accused. Is it because of ion and the
present highest rated chess player in the world , Magnus Carlsen? Well, is it?

You did not see my explanation of my plan of attack on one of the games of
mine that greenspawn34 posted of mine on the chess forum? Maybe you
should go back and check again. He had thought I had one plan in mine and
I informed him I did not think of his plan but was thinking of another plan and
he agreed my plan was better.

Originally posted by RJHinds
No.

Ok. But if you are lying then you will be caught, if not here, in your dreams. You cant escape your consience.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I was not exposed as a cheat. It was only believed by some. There was no
absolute proof, only accusations and speculations. And as kingshill pointed
out if this 60+% matchup rate was proof of cheating then nearly everyone
that I played against must have been cheating too. I lost several of those
games and had some draws too.

So, Zygalski's decision, which at one point you said you accepted, and which was "The analysis indicates idiotic engine use", is something you no longer accept?

Originally posted by karoly aczel
Ok. But if you are lying then you will be caught, if not here, in your dreams. You cant escape your consience.

He has been caught. That is the whole point.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
Ok. But if you are lying then you will be caught, if not here, in your dreams. You cant escape your consience.

I knew that would not make any difference. Proper Knob didn't believe me either.

P.S. There is at least one guy that will not accept games with a time limit of less
than 21 days per move.

Originally posted by FMF
He has been caught. That is the whole point.

So then he is out and out lying?

Anyway, I'd rather be caught here than haunted in my dreams. You ever had that happen to you?

I have, and I tell you, there is nothing worse- I'd rather be tortured.

Originally posted by RJHinds
You did not see my explanation of my plan of attack on one of the games of
mine that greenspawn34 posted of mine on the chess forum? Maybe you
should go back and check again. He had thought I had one plan in mine and
I informed him I did not think of his plan but was thinking of another plan and
he agreed my plan was better.

lists of variations are meaningless, anyone can get a variation from a computer,
humans think in quite different terms.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I knew that would not make any difference. Proper Knob didn't believe me either.

No, it makes some difference, your answer has been noted. I await future developments, if you turn out to be legit , then fine.

I just dont know why you haven't been banned from here forever- obviously there is still some doubt- or the mods aren't doing their job ...

Originally posted by karoly aczel
So then he is out and out lying?

He submitted himself to an analysis of his games to see if there was evidence of engine use, and said he would accept the verdict, and although the verdict was the analysis indicates idiotic engine use [which is cheating according to the TOS of this site] RJHinds is still here, backpeddlling, still posting and still making chess moves.

Thread 145363