Originally posted by humyNo one knows what perfection is............if they have not studied the eternal Vedas.
“...The universe is perfect and so is everything else that can be perceived.
The thing is....... no one knows what perfection is. ...”
but if that is true then YOU cannot know what 'perfection' is thus begging the question HOW can you RATIONALLY know that the universe is 'perfect' when you don't even know what 'perfection' is! ?????
well?
However those who have embraced the Vedas have all knowledge of all things.
Originally posted by DasaAssuming that is true... That pretty much conclusively proves that you have not 'embraced the Vedas'
No one knows what perfection is............if they have not studied the eternal Vedas.
However those who have embraced the Vedas have all knowledge of all things.
because you're spectacularly ignorant about almost everything.
Originally posted by RJHindsYes that fact that you were 'an "A" student' in college maths definitely makes you smarter and
I was an "A" student in my math classes in college. So you are talking out of
your arse, like Ace Ventura.
more knowledgeable than the entirety of the scientific community....
If your sarcasm detector didn't just explode it's broken.
You are an ignoramus and moron who knows nothing of science and no amount of wallpaper is
going to change that.
Originally posted by RJHindsActually reality is a non-partisan issue.
That is all liberal Democtatic propaganda.
There are morons who deny it on all sides of the political spectrum.
And people who accept reality on all sides of the political spectrum.
Neither the republicans or democrats have a monopoly on truth or stupidity.
Originally posted by googlefudgeLiberal Democrat - A nice way of saying compulsive liar.
Actually reality is a non-partisan issue.
There are morons who deny it on all sides of the political spectrum.
And people who accept reality on all sides of the political spectrum.
Neither the republicans or democrats have a monopoly on truth or stupidity.
Originally posted by Dasawithout observing their observations? you're not making sense, as usual. typical behavior of the perfect moron.
Persons who push evolution upon us without honestly observing their observations - and then return rude comments to defend there poor observations - only crystallize the fact that evolution is for fools and rascals.
How does the chicken lay its egg?
Did the chicken which didn't really look like a chicken in the beginning have a placenta birth long ago??? ...[text shortened]... - so the humans can collect them and store them on their supermarkets shelves in the future?
Originally posted by DasaI think stellspalfie gives a good example of how the evolutionist think. Now
Persons who push evolution upon us without honestly observing their observations - and then return rude comments to defend there poor observations - only crystallize the fact that evolution is for fools and rascals.
How does the chicken lay its egg?
Did the chicken which didn't really look like a chicken in the beginning have a placenta birth long ago??? ...[text shortened]... - so the humans can collect them and store them on their supermarkets shelves in the future?
do you think it is possible to reason with those kind of people on evolution?
I also have doubts if we can reason together on the Vedas and the Holy Bible
because of our different ways of thinking on religious matters.
08 Apr 12
Originally posted by RJHindsYou are off the far nutty end of the right wing and it was a joke.
Yes, a very conservative Republican - almost right wing, but not far right.
P.S. I believe in a woman's right to choose, as long as she chooses NOT to
abort her baby. HalleluYah !!!
(silly me I forgot you have no detectable sense of humour)
You said that Liberal Democrat was a nice way of saying compulsive liar.
I said 'but I thought you were a Republican'
Can you figure it out?
Or do I have to draw diagrams.
A foetus isn't a baby.
It's a tiny ball of cells, a lump of meat, a dumb blob.
Incapable of experiencing pain, or anything else.
Incapable of thought and holding no memories.
An embryo, a foetus.
A women has the right to choose not to turn her body into a life support
machine for someone else.
Originally posted by Dasa-if both of those statements are true then nobody has embraced the Vedas.
No one knows what perfection is............if they have not studied the eternal Vedas.
However those who have embraced the Vedas have all knowledge of all things.
Why? because you cannot have both somebody having “embraced the Vedas” implying “have all knowledge of ALL things” AND have nobody having knowledge of what is 'perfection' because that is a contradiction for if you don't know one thing then you do not know all things.
And that would not answer my question anyway:
How can you rationally know that “The universe is perfect” when nobody including yourself knows what 'perfection' is?
I hope you at least have the intelligence to know that one minimum requirement for your beliefs to have any chance of being all true is that they must be completely free of logical self-contradiction -right?
Originally posted by googlefudgeI knew your intentions. However I decided to be nice and just ignore your
You are off the far nutty end of the right wing and it was a joke.
(silly me I forgot you have no detectable sense of humour)
You said that Liberal Democrat was a nice way of saying compulsive liar.
I said 'but I thought you were a Republican'
Can you figure it out?
Or do I have to draw diagrams.
A foetus isn't a baby.
It's a tiny ball ...[text shortened]... has the right to choose not to turn her body into a life support
machine for someone else.
facetiousness. I will repeat I am not far right because I believe in a woman's
right to choose as long as she chooses Not to abort her baby or foetus, if you
prefer.
Your definition is obsolete since the so-called fetus has been shown to be able
to experience pain making it a human baby. It is just not capable of living
outside the mother's womb without extraordinary care.