30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeIf you read that single verse in context (read prior and subsequent verses as well,) you’ll see it’s not speaking about fingerprints at all.
Perhaps I'm also not interested 'in commenting on “prophecies” from a false religion. 😵
The 'fingerprinting prophecy' was in actuality from the Koran (not of Hindu origin as I had thought). Do you recognize it from the OT?
“Their skins will bear witness against them as to what they have been doing” (41:21)
Nothing on Daniel 9? That’s longer than a single verse and far more explicit than your desperation heave at the buzzer. Accurate too.
30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeApparently Hinduism has numerous creation accounts. Which one do you find most credible?
The religious writings of Hinduism (The Vedas) also address creation sir.
And yes, Hinduism is recognized as the oldest religion still practiced today. Google it. 🙂
30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @whodeyIt was a very interesting and useful website and resourceful people here will still be able to access it using get-arounds like the one leunnami suggested.
Thank God they blocked it [www.answering-islam.org].
Can you imagine people discussing things that might offend you?
We all need to come together and think and act the exact same way in order to maintain our utopia.
30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Don't be such a buffoon. For all intents and purposes, www.answering-islam.org is an "anti-Islam" website.
I’m sure atheists will be glad they can still access it. Atheists have a peculiar affinity for Islam.
30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @fmfNot from the few minutes I spent on there. Lot of resources for Christ deniers and Christ haters. I’m sure you start with your panting, twitching and heavy breathing at even the thought of logging onto it.
Don't be such a buffoon. For all intents and purposes, www.answering-islam.org is an "anti-Islam" website.
30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Whether you spend a few minutes on it, or if you spend a few days on it, www.answering-islam.org is an "anti-Islam" website which exhibits some academic rigour in many of its articles. It is bitterly critical of Islamic theology and staunchly supportive of Christianity, being run by evangelical Christians, for Christians (and perhaps wavering Muslims interested in converting to Christianity), and for this reason, it has been blocked by the Indonesian Ministry of Information. Page 17 of a thread, 250 posts in, and you don't even have enough integrity to inform yourself of what the thread's topic is.
Not from the few minutes I spent on there. Lot of resources for Christ deniers and Christ haters. I’m sure you start with your panting, twitching and heavy breathing at even the thought of logging onto it.
Originally posted by @fmfSimply shows how little I think of your threads and posts. One can certainly be critical of Islam and also misrepresent the Gospel in Christianity.
Whether you spend a few minutes on it, or if you spend a few days on it, www.answering-islam.org is an "anti-Islam" website which exhibits some academic rigour in many of its articles. It is bitterly critical of Islamic theology and staunchly supportive of Christianity, being run by evangelical Christians, for Christians (and perhaps wavering Muslims interested ...[text shortened]... s in, and you don't even have enough integrity to inform yourself of what the thread's topic is.
30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Simply shows how little I think of your threads and posts.
Simply shows how little I think of your threads and posts. One can certainly be critical of Islam and also misrepresent the Gospel in Christianity.
On the contrary, I think it shows how little respect you have for yourself.
One can certainly be critical of Islam and also misrepresent the Gospel in Christianity.
From the website: "We are Evangelical Christians and agree without reservations with the statement of faith as given, for example, by the World Evangelical Alliance [http://worldevangelical.org/]and the Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization [https://www.lausanne.org/].
30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @fmfLet me know when you’ve stopped with the panting. The spittle and saliva flies out of your mouth when you get excited, and I already had a shower today.
[b]Simply shows how little I think of your threads and posts.
On the contrary, I think it shows how little respect you have for yourself.
One can certainly be critical of Islam and also misrepresent the Gospel in Christianity.
From the website: "We are Evangelical Christians and agree without reservations with the statement of faith as given ...[text shortened]... vangelical.org/]and the Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization [https://www.lausanne.org/].[/b]
Say it, don’t spray it, Kiddo
Originally posted by @romans1009The website www.answering-islam.org has a "lot of resources for Christ deniers and Christ haters"? Examples please, links, which pages?
Not from the few minutes I spent on [at www.answering-islam.org]. Lot of resources for Christ deniers and Christ haters.
Originally posted by @romans1009You have stated something that is clearly untrue about the website that is the topic of this thread. Can you provide any links to material on that website that can be described as a "lot of resources for Christ deniers and Christ haters"?
Just go to the home page and peruse the articles, Kiddo. But use your inhaler first.
Originally posted by @fmfWhich of your famous rebuttals would you prefer I use?
You have stated something that is clearly untrue about the website that is the topic of this thread. Can you provide any links to material on that website that can be described as a "lot of resources for Christ deniers and Christ haters"?
a) I already answered that numerous times, as I’m sure you recall, in another thread and feel under no compulsion to answer it again.
b) You’ll just have to be satisfied with the information I’ve given you.
c) You can have whatever opinion you want. I’m just calling it as I see it. Everyone should do that.
30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009The problem here is that you are deliberately saying things in your posts which you know are not true.
Which of your famous rebuttals would you prefer I use?
a) I already answered that numerous times, as I’m sure you recall, in another thread and feel under no compulsion to answer it again.
b) You’ll just have to be satisfied with the information I’ve given you.
c) You can have whatever opinion you want. I’m just calling it as I see it. Everyone should do that.