Go back
‘Eternal suffering’ is nonsensical

‘Eternal suffering’ is nonsensical

Spirituality

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
30 Dec 17

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Christians who believe in a hell of eternal suffering are self-serving, even if this is on a subconscious level. It stems from a deviant desire for others who are not as good as them or lived lives they don't approve of to be punished. Their own 'goodness' is vindicated by a God who punishes lesser human beings. Such a belief is born of 'spite.' It has nothing to do with divine righteousness. It is all about human weakness.
Christians who believe in a hell of eternal suffering are self-serving,


To this Christian it is to be awestruck that from the mouth of the One the world's greatest words of mercy, pardon, forgivness, came also the most fearsome words of judgment.

I am in awe.
Should I pretend that Jesus didn't utter both kinds of teachings?
I can't honestly pretend and choose what I like and reject what I don't.


even if this is on a subconscious level. It stems from a deviant desire for others who are not as good as them or lived lives they don't approve of to be punished.


if someone warns you about going over Niagara Falls if you don't get out of the river, it doesn't matter his secret motives may subconsciously be.

No one was purer than Jesus. And these words of warning to believe in Him came from Him. Jesus spoke these things among all the other marvelous things Jesus spoke.

Even on a philosophical level, genetic fallacy is not reliable.
" It is not true because the subconscious of the repeater is amiss."


Their own 'goodness' is vindicated by a God who punishes lesser human beings.


No. I have first come to the point where a circle was drawn around ME and ME alone. I was before God alone. The "other guy" had nothing to do with it. It was between me and God.

The merit I stand on is Christ.
I do not stand upon my own merit.

I have to go now.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
30 Dec 17

Originally posted by @fmf
Well, that only leaves 'lack of belief' as a reason to be sent to "hell" which substantiates the point that divegeester was making in his OP.
Acceptance or rejection of the gift is equated with salvation or loss.
Lack of belief is not the issue.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
30 Dec 17

Originally posted by @freakykbh
Acceptance or rejection of the gift is equated with salvation or loss.
Lack of belief is not the issue.
Lack of belief in the existence of the supposed "gift" is clearly the issue.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
30 Dec 17

Originally posted by @sonship
if someone warns you about going over Niagara Falls if you don't get out of the river, it doesn't matter his secret motives may subconsciously be.
it certainly does matter what his secret motives may subconsciously be if there is no river and there is no waterfall and the person he claims he is warning is not in a boat.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
30 Dec 17
1 edit

Originally posted by @fmf
it certainly does matter what his secret motives may subconsciously be if there is no river and there is no waterfall and the person he claims he is warning is not in a boat.
in that case you are right.

Now people have to decide whether or not they regard Jesus Christ Who spoke these things to the world ... if He was a crackpot.

If He doesn't sound like or act like a biggest history's crackpot, then His words are to be taken seriously.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
30 Dec 17
2 edits

Originally posted by @fmf
Lack of belief in the existence of the supposed "gift" is clearly the issue.
No, being reconciled to God is the issue.

You are hunting for a technicality or logical anomaly which makes it not important to not be reconciled to God. Such a thing does not exist.

And you are a fool to trust in your ability to concoct one.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
30 Dec 17
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

I sympathize somewhat with thoughtful people who seem perplexed at the question of "Well what does Jesus save me from? Not being saved?"

Jesus spoke of every kind of sin may be forgiven except an eternal sin. An eternal sin has no forgiveness.

Mark 3:28-30: "Truly I tell you, all sins and blasphemes will be forgiven for the sons of men. But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven, but is guilty of an eternal sin. He said this because they [the Pharisees] were saying, 'He has an evil spirit'."


It must be that to reject the Lord Jesus is an eternal sin the guilt of which one will bear forever.

While I could not be too strong about this, it appears to me that rejection of Christ is making God a liar and blasphemy of an eternal nature. Maybe God sees it as akin to saying the Holy Spirit is an evil Spirit because it is a lying liar.

"If we receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater, because this is the testimony of God that He has testified concerning His Son.

He who believes into the Son of God has the testimony in himself; he who does not believe God has made Him a liar because he has not believed in the testimony which God has testified concerning His Son.

And this is the testimony, that God gave to us eternal life and this life is in His Son.

He who has the Son has the life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have the life.

I have written these things to you that you may know that you have eternal life, to you who believe into the name of the Son of God." (1 John 5:9-13)


Eternal salvation is not nonsensical as the Thread says.
What anyone reading this thread has been informed of is adequate.

There may be some unknowns about particular cases we cannot figure out. But what we who read here have heard from the Gospel is adequate.

divegeester

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120150
Clock
30 Dec 17

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Christians who believe in a hell of eternal suffering are self-serving, even if this is on a subconscious level. It stems from a deviant desire for others who are not as good as them or lived lives they don't approve of to be punished. Their own 'goodness' is vindicated by a God who punishes lesser human beings. Such a belief is born of 'spite.' It has nothing to do with divine righteousness. It is all about human weakness.
I’ll Amen that post.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
30 Dec 17

What I wonder is, is there a correlation between those who do not believe that that was God as a Man dying and rising from the dead to save us, AND their attitude about eternal punishment.

It seems often the case to me, that those who don't believe Jesus is God also don't understand the enormity of the crime of rejecting Him.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
30 Dec 17

Originally posted by @fmf
Lack of belief in the existence of the supposed "gift" is clearly the issue.
There is no rejection of its existence without contemplation of its existence.

There is nothing left at that point but acceptance (His work as replacement of your work) or rejection (standing before God the quintessential self-made man).

divegeester

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120150
Clock
30 Dec 17

Originally posted by @sonship
What I wonder is, is there a correlation between those who do not believe that that was God as a Man dying and rising from the dead to save us, AND their attitude about eternal punishment.

It seems often the case to me, that those who don't believe Jesus is God also don't understand the enormity of the crime of rejecting Him.
What I wonder is how in the name of all that is holy, you think that that keeping people supernaturally alive and burning them for eternity somehow represents any form of judgment which is congruent with any crime. ANY crime.

That you call a failure to believe a “crime” punishable by eternal torture, when you believe in predestination, is absolutely incomprehensible.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29254
Clock
30 Dec 17

Originally posted by @sonship
Christians who believe in a hell of eternal suffering are self-serving,


To this Christian it is to be awestruck that from the mouth of the One the world's greatest words of mercy, pardon, forgivness, came also the most fearsome words of judgment.

I am in awe.
Should I pretend that Jesus didn't utter both kinds of teachings?
I can't ...[text shortened]... od.

The merit I stand on is Christ.
I do not stand upon my own merit.

I have to go now.
Pity you had to go before responding to the last sentence in my post, which was actually the most pertinent.

'Such a belief is born of 'spite.' It has nothing to do with divine righteousness. It is all about human weakness.'

I simply don't believe your statement - "The "other guy" had nothing to do with it. It was between me and God." (And deep down, if you are truly honest with yourself, you don't believe it either). Linking eternal suffering as you do with divine righteousness is an affront to God and a manifestation of your inner weakness where your own salvation is dependent upon others enduring a miserable fate.

In short your misunderstanding about God's righteousness and eternal suffering is a result of too much thought and not enough heart.

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
30 Dec 17
2 edits

Originally posted by @sonship
What I wonder is, is there a correlation between those who do not believe that that was God as a Man dying and rising from the dead to save us, AND their attitude about eternal punishment.

It seems often the case to me, that those who don't believe Jesus is God also don't understand the enormity of the crime of rejecting Him.
“It seems often the case to me, that those who don't believe Jesus is God also don't understand the enormity of the crime of rejecting Him.”

We who simply lack belief but are happy to accept such gifts, thank goodness Freaky says, “Acceptance or rejection of the gift is equated with salvation or loss. Lack of belief is not the issue.”

I fear for whichever of you might have it wrong.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
30 Dec 17

Originally posted by @js357
“It seems often the case to me, that those who don't believe Jesus is God also don't understand the enormity of the crime of rejecting Him.”

We who simply lack belief but are happy to accept such gifts, thank goodness Freaky says, “Acceptance or rejection of the gift is equated with salvation or loss. Lack of belief is not the issue.”

I fear for whichever of you might have it wrong.
Why would you ever fear for someone else's perspective on any issue?

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
Clock
30 Dec 17

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Pity you had to go before responding to the last sentence in my post, which was actually the most pertinent.

'Such a belief is born of 'spite.' It has nothing to do with divine righteousness. It is all about human weakness.'

I simply don't believe your statement - "The "other guy" had nothing to do with it. It was between me and God." (And d ...[text shortened]... God's righteousness and eternal suffering is a result of too much thought and not enough heart.
God made something that runs on God.
Put something besides God in it, it ceases to run as designed.
Whether articulated thusly or not, those who choose to run on His are simply making a decision on what will fuel them.
A conscious decision against that operational status results in the same thing for everyone so inclined.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.