Originally posted by Helder OctavioRighto mate, i'll bite. Whats 3(c)?
With this advertise:
"[Profile removed by RHP admin 2007-03-13]. Oh come on!
What the hell is going on with this place! Grow up the lot of you!"
I can see:
1. you don´t know to use "copy and paste" to read an electronic newspapper;
2. you don´t know who is Diego Armando Maradona;
3. you didn´t read the RHP Terms of Service, item 3(c).
Take care.
Maradonna is still a little gremlin.
😛
Originally posted by Helder OctavioKeeping it simple.....
http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2007/03/29/maradona_sedated_treated_for_abuses/?rss_id=Boston.com+%2F+News
Maradona or Pelé?
IMHO Pele was better then Maradona, although would have liked to have both playing for City 😀
As to various other comments....I reckon Blade got it right earlier when he said you could produce a different list every day depending on your mood.....
There's been loads of great players for all different reasons, we'll never agree....great discussions though ;-)
Originally posted by SeitseThe behavior.
So let's discuss... what are the differences between them on the
playfield?
Pelé always was a consciencious pro player; besides, he had
fantastic and honest team mates; his father, João Ramos do
Nascimento, aka Dondinho, midfield too, teached the young
Pelé to defend himself, hitting in violent players with discrip-
tion (Procópio was an exception - Pelé never liked his, and
never explained this - : first, Pelé broken his leg in a friendly
game; later, when Procópio began in São Paulo F.C. against
Santos F.C., Pelé humiliated him with all type of dribbles...
Procópio didn´t return for the 2nd half...).
Maradona didn´t has humility. It was worst when he reached at
the top, in Napoli. Bad friends introduced him in the world of
drugs. This destroyed the art (and it´s destroying the life) of
Maradona.
The rest is history.