Bonus question…

@AverageJoe1

Marauder, it is about a law in NY against falsifying business records. You and Mott and I know that to be a misdemeanor. The reason the pitiful little charge was made at all is because, you guessed it, he is Donald Trump and hated by many of those involved. Get Trump! Find a Reason!

And taking the spot light off them and their their corruption? Would everyone still think the same of them if this all came out? They control the media and other outlets! What about their future plans for what’s right and just in America, how scary is that looking at now? This is the Land of the Free Home of the Brave paved by those who fought and died for this privilege in all ways. They spit in the faces of those who did so and are. They use this privilege of freedom now reshaping the country unjustly and un honorably. They cancel the true Americans now by canceling us out with words and threats along with losing jobs, face, and influence. Their taking us out of the picture, we’re losing our voice and their paving the way for their agendas now and the future. Their doing this now by giving fools and nuts power over us in every realm and their representing us on a world stage influencing beyond.

@mike69 said
@AverageJoe1

Marauder, it is about a law in NY against falsifying business records. You and Mott and I know that to be a misdemeanor. The reason the pitiful little charge was made at all is because, you guessed it, he is Donald Trump and hated by many of those involved. Get Trump! Find a Reason!

And taking the spot light off them and their their corruption? Would every ...[text shortened]... and nuts power over us in every realm and their representing us on a world stage influencing beyond.

@no1marauder said
How many raving nuts on this Forum are too many?

No, the charges Trump has been formally accused of are not misdemeanors.

If any other CEO had had his personal lawyer pay off someone to keep quiet about an affair and then reimbursed him with corporate funds falsely labeled as "legal expenses", a prosecution would have been utterly routine.

All this is just right wingers insisting that Donald Trump is not subject to the same laws as everyone else.

@no1marauder said
If any other CEO had had his personal lawyer pay off someone to keep quiet about an affair and then reimbursed him with corporate funds falsely labeled as "legal expenses", a prosecution would have been utterly routine.

All this is just right wingers insisting that Donald Trump is not subject to the same laws as everyone else.

@vivify said
The DA has the ability to pursue this as a felony if it can be showed that crime was committed with the intent of covering up another crime; this is what would make the misdemeanor a felony.

Also: campaign finance violations are a federal crime and are felonies by themselves regardless of Trump committing business records fraud.

@mott-the-hoople said
bragg doesnt have jurisdiction over federal crimes...daaayyyuuuummmm

@vivify said
The DA has the ability to pursue this as a felony if it can be showed that crime was committed with the intent of covering up another crime; this is what would make the misdemeanor a felony.

Also: campaign finance violations are a federal crime and are felonies by themselves regardless of Trump committing business records fraud.

@no1marauder said
If any other CEO had had his personal lawyer pay off someone to keep quiet about an affair and then reimbursed him with corporate funds falsely labeled as "legal expenses", a prosecution would have been utterly routine.

All this is just right wingers insisting that Donald Trump is not subject to the same laws as everyone else.

@vivify said
Who said he did? My point is Trump still has possible felonies with or without falsifying business records.

@averagejoe1 said
I am indisposed for a link right now, and I unsubscribed NexLex so at a loss on knowing the NY law. But for 100 years, the universal standard, which is all I can go by in an argument, such as this would be that it is a misdemeanor, which could be bounced up to a felony under under certain circumstances, of which Bragg will be digging deep to find. That has not happened. There is no felony.

@averagejoe1 said
Possible?? You and Marauder need to square your stories. Is there a felony or not?

@no1marauder said
If any other CEO had had his personal lawyer pay off someone to keep quiet about an affair and then reimbursed him with corporate funds falsely labeled as "legal expenses", a prosecution would have been utterly routine.

All this is just right wingers insisting that Donald Trump is not subject to the same laws as everyone else.

@vivify said
The courts are currently in the process of deciding that.

@averagejoe1 said
Possible?? You and Marauder need to square your stories. Is there a felony or not?