Go back
CDC Reverses Mask Policy

CDC Reverses Mask Policy

Debates

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89770
Clock
29 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sh76 said
I really wish the CDC would announce some sort of off-ramp here. Unless the recommendation is going to be to mask for life, what metric has to show what number to make us comfortable that vaccinated people are protected? COVID-zero? Not happening. When there can be no more variants? Impossible to tell. Is the CDC going to recommend masks every time seasonal cases go up?
If the US could reach the 80+% fully vaccinated, then the masks become a total non-issue.

Until that point, arguments can be made that they’re needed to drop the R-rate to stop the speed of infection.

The bigger issue with the masks and corona measures (like hand washing and social distancing) is that it’s dropped the R-rate in many diseases.
Much less common colds, flu, etc.
This means less costs for insurance companies. Less sick days for employers to contend with.

That lobby group is one to watch. They have a load of benefit by continuing various measures.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
29 Jul 21
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir

Can people acquire immunity naturally by getting sick and recovering?

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89770
Clock
29 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@eladar said
@shavixmir

Can people acquire immunity naturally by getting sick and recovering?
Yes.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
29 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
Yes.
So if people are getting sick and better everyday and many millions of people have already have immunity naturally, why is it that only getting people jabbed is the solution?

More people are gaining immunity everyday both with jabs and without.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89770
Clock
29 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@eladar said
So if people are getting sick and better everyday and many millions of people have already have immunity naturally, why is it that only getting people jabbed is the solution?

More people are gaining immunity everyday both with jabs and without.
I’ve explained this 100 times to you.
If you don’t comprehend by now, I fear you’re never going to get it.

One last time:
Corona is not a common cold or a flu.
It has the potential (which has clearly been proven) to take down the health system.
If the health system collapses, society collapses.
The rate of transmission has to be slowed. And to a lesser extent, you don’t want hundreds of thousands or millions of people dying either.
So, in the begin you implement measures like working from home, keeping distances, etc. to slow the rate of infection: to manage the crisis.

Now we have vaccines. They replace the measures. And keep people from getting seriously ill (94% effective) or dying.

It speeds up the rate of managing the crisis, keeping people from sickness and death and returning to a more normal situation.

If we didn’t implement measures or vaccines, it would take too long for us to reach those goals. The health system wouldn’t cope. And death rates of all sorts of matters would skyrocket.

The US was slow in implementing measures last year. Just look what happened. If no measures had been taken, what do you think the consequences would have been?

And that’s why we need to jab as many people as possible. Get this over as quickly as possible.

Fewer transmissions with a shorter time being able to pass from one person to another means far fewer mutations to contend with.
Each mutation is a roll of the dice.

And that’s it from me on this matter to you.
If you don’t want to see this picture, the same one every single government on the planet and every single health service is saying, then nothing I can say is going to change that.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
29 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
I’ve explained this 100 times to you.
If you don’t comprehend by now, I fear you’re never going to get it.

One last time:
Corona is not a common cold or a flu.
It has the potential (which has clearly been proven) to take down the health system.
If the health system collapses, society collapses.
The rate of transmission has to be slowed. And to a lesser extent, you ...[text shortened]... he planet and every single health service is saying, then nothing I can say is going to change that.
"It has the potential (which has clearly been proven) to take down the health system.
If the health system collapses, society collapses."

You are a moron. That has not been proven and even if it was that was then. This is now.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89770
Clock
29 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
"It has the potential (which has clearly been proven) to take down the health system.
If the health system collapses, society collapses."

You are a moron. That has not been proven and even if it was that was then. This is now.
🙄

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
29 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir

Based on the known number of recovered cases in the US, there are about 150 million people in the US with natural immunity by way of recovery.

So these 150 million would need no shot.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
29 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir

Just because you believe something doesn't make it so.

https://fee.org/articles/americans-are-wildly-misinformed-about-the-risk-of-hospitalization-from-covid-19-survey-shows-here-s-why/

Stop spreading misinformation!

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
29 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

Looks like this reversal in policy is due to cases spreading in Massachusetts where 74 percent of people are fully vaccinated. Fauci said the fact that the vaccines do not work as well on the delta variant, masks are back.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
30 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

I was mistaken about the 74 percent, it was that 74 percent of the people with COVID were fully vaccinated. Here is a story on it

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/30/cdc-study-shows-74percent-of-people-infected-in-massachusetts-covid-outbreak-were-fully-vaccinated.html

P

Joined
23 Nov 11
Moves
45294
Clock
30 Jul 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
They are admitting the vaccines don't prevent the spread of the virus. If they really represented a very small amount of transmission there would be no need to tell vaccinated people to mask up. They are contradicting themselves like they always do.
First of all, this is called science. Scientists are continually finding new information about the virus. The recommendations will change over time. The vaccines work very well but too many people are not getting vaccinated and so the virus is mutating. Strains more resistant to the vaccines are bound to emerge. You, and other conservatives on this site, are proof that the U.S. has a dismal primary and secondary education system.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
30 Jul 21
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@phranny said
First of all, this is called science. Scientists are continually finding new information about the virus. The recommendations will change over time. The vaccines work very well but too many people are not getting vaccinated and so the virus is mutating. Strains more resistant to the vaccines are bound to emerge. You, and other conservatives on this site, are proof that the U.S. has a dismal primary and secondary education system.
Too many people are not getting vaccinated? In which country?

BTW, how has it neen proven it is due to not getting vaccinated that causes the variants?

Face it, nobody knows what is going.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.