Go back
Drag queens

Drag queens

Debates

TM

rebel city

Joined
20 Jun 09
Moves
74241
Clock
08 Feb 14
1 edit

Originally posted by buckky
Has anyone ever noticed that the women on Fox News all look like drag queens ?
I dont't know what the Fox News girls look like but if you think they look like drag queens I wonder if this is not your fantasy. Excuse me but the drag queens I have seen (on stage and tranvestites) are noticeable different from real women. In their best outlook, one can always note at least one detail that will make the whole difference.

That said, I recently saw a documentary on Thailand lady boys and it is impressive how feminine they are. I understand how men fall in love with them.

Life is crazy. 🙂

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
08 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
08 Feb 14

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
09 Feb 14
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
The further away from my career in corporate life, the more it seems like a sociology experiment, especially those days when women were first making their mark in the upper echelons of management at my employer. Our first female VP, I believe, was in charge of HR. A close fiend of mine succeeded in going from "Xerox girl" to head of a 250-employee chemical plant, getting her law degree and passing the bar along the way. At one point I reported to a woman who reported to a woman VP. Most of the women who did this did it without marriage (or after ending a marriage) or children. That aspect seems to have abated to some extent.

The women of Fox, at least the more ambitious ones, are dressing for success. Some or most of their choices are purposeful; choices they make because of the expectations in their environment.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
" To this day, there's a connection in some fields between a woman's willingness to yield her sexual favours to powerful men and her prospects of career advancement."

These days, casting the scenario as a transaction between powerful male predator and favor-giving female prey may overlook some permutations.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
No doubt about your awareness, but this conversation is in public.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Based on the number of Fox women at the link I posted, I'd say it is a slam dunk that Fox has lesbians on staff. Also with that many women, the Fox lawyers are probably nervous all the time.

We haven't spoken of harassment laws and how they work. Maybe another time, under a more fitting thread title.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
10 Feb 14
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JS357


The women of Fox, at least the more ambitious ones, are dressing for success. Some or most of their choices are purposeful; choices they make because of the expectations in their environment.
That word, "expectations"...I disagree that it's an expectation that women be sexy news anchors, or sexy in most professional fields. Again, look at Van Sustren (still can't spell it) who has no sex appeal at all. Same for the great Margaret Thatcher, Ellen Degeneres, and Hillary "pants suit" Clinton. True, sex sppeal gives one an advantage in any field, but that's for both men and women. And it still doesn't necessarily mean that it's required.

In my opinion, women thinking they have to be pretty to succeed, is no different from athletes who think they need steroids to suceed. It's the pressure of competition with others trying to get their spots, that makes it seem like their own merit isn't enough.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
10 Feb 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
10 Feb 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Margaret's appeal probably had nothing to do with her looks, but with her persona; a tough, no nonsense type, similar to a dominatrix.

And yes, attractiveness is emphasized much more with women; but I don't see it as a requirement for women in most fields, though it gives an advantage. Of course, this probably wasn't the case a generation ago.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
10 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Come to think of it, I am surprised that women in the military don't shave their heads like men.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
10 Feb 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by vivify
Margaret's appeal probably had nothing to do with her looks, but with her persona; a tough, no nonsense type, similar to a dominatrix.

And yes, attractiveness is emphasized much more with women; but I don't see it as a requirement for women in most fields, though it gives an advantage. Of course, this probably wasn't the case a generation ago.
her appeal? her attractiveness? to whom did she appeal? Neo Nazis? she was loathed in many instances and still is, infact one town built an effigy of her on news of her death and gleefully torched it amid celebrations.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.