Ecuador's socialist constitution

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Too bad; at least you had an excuse then for sounding like an idiot.

Originally posted by no1marauder
Too bad; at least you had an excuse then for sounding like an idiot.

That is rich. And your greatness derives from which of your mighty achievements? Playing chess and writing non-sense in the forums?

Your mighty strength of being seems to come to you with no effort. How fitting.

Originally posted by StarValleyWy
That is rich. And your greatness derives from which of your mighty achievements? Playing chess and writing non-sense in the forums?

Your mighty strength of being seems to come to you with no effort. How fitting.

Don't say "rich." He hates the wealthy.

Originally posted by ale1552
What history books have you been reading? It was the very strength of our military under Reagan that helped topple the Reds. (Carter was a great president?....oh, please!!!!) I am through trying to reason with you brain-washed idiots.

The USSR was already on a trajectory to implode by 1980, and subsequent US military spending had virtually nothing to do with the breakup of the Soviet Union. Truman and Marshall had the broader strategy right from the beginning. For another thing, if Reagan's huge military spending was necessary to break up the Soviet Union as you claim, then why did Jesse Helms threaten President Clinton's life when Clinton reduced military spending in 1993-4, AFTER the breakup of the Soviet Union?

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Yes, Carter was a pretty decent president. He was on track to fix the economy, just not in time to win the election against the con artist Reagan. President Clinton learned from what happened to Carter with Reagan's credit jumping of Carter's fixing the economy, which is one of the reasons that the Clinton administration started fixing the economy right away in 1993.

Carter was also on the right track with his work on alternative energy programmes, which that idiot Reagan tossed out after he was elected.

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Don't say "rich." He hates the wealthy.

lol

So why do I still see him getting out of the limosine in his silk scarf at the carlton ritz in nyc then?

Do you remember the picture he posted a few years ago of that? The night he took his little whore boys out on the town?

🙄

Originally posted by karnachz
The USSR was already on a trajectory to implode by 1980, and subsequent US military spending had virtually nothing to do with the breakup of the Soviet Union. Truman and Marshall had the broader strategy right from the beginning. For another thing, if Reagan's huge military spending was necessary to break up the Soviet Union as you claim, then why did Jesse ...[text shortened]... k on alternative energy programmes, which that idiot Reagan tossed out after he was elected.

Let me guess. You are a 23 year old college student.

You can't have been alive and think carter was anything but a fool.

Originally posted by StarValleyWy
Let me guess. You are a 23 year old college student.

You can't have been alive and think carter was anything but a fool.

Rather than getting ad hominem in typical Republican style, would you like to actually provide some specifics of what policies of Carter's you take issue with?

Originally posted by no1marauder
Virtually all are examples of democracy in action. Where's the "dictatorship"?

You must be joking...