@AverageJoe1 saidDo we HAVE to pass constitutional amendments simply to get you people to do the right thing?
Since 10th Amendment clearly leaves such powers to the states, it renders your post headed to the rubbish can
Did you see Marauder say that the PA law is a law, and in next post says it is not a law?
Of course that makes perfect sense to you…..
Geez. Both of you.
Apparently.
You follow Trump.
You promote immorality.
You're destroying America, not making it "great again".
America became "almost great" once we left behind the morals of 1950's hard right, hard white, criminally defective, self-important, "me, me, me" immorality.
And now it's back. That is what is disgusting.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou come to my house and I will shoot your ear off.
Getting like SHouse? Let the states decide, you imbecile!!!
I will come to your house and rearrange your furniture. Jesus.
53d
@Zahlanzi saidBut, are you in the mood to agree with his saying something is a law, and in the next para, says it is not a law?
I am not always in the mood to see marauder try to explain something that goes over your head
As to your undecipherable take on the various states, they operate separately you maniac! , but you apply liberal-think that everyone is coooooonnnneeeeeeeeeeeeccctedd.
Learn aspects of individualism, it applies to states as well as people. You are the mobbiest mob person here.
53d
@Suzianne saidDid matriculation of Spanish speaking Mexicans illegals sitting next to your child…..did that ruin schools? Hey- A good reason to Makealotofmoney…..so you can get your kid OUT of that school and go private.
Snowflakes. You're all snowflakes.
THAT is what has destroyed the system of Education we have in this country.
All because you think your kids are "special".
53d
@Suzianne saidOh you want to talk disgusting. Is it disgusting to be in favor of the many things that you liberals are? A man turns himself into a woman. A man is allowed to compete against simple girls. These are disgusting. It would be a worldwide agreement. But you will not respond to this and say yes, you agree that It is disgusting.
Your ideas are disgusting, even without your word salad.
We see you.
So we consider you disingenuous. I will note that in my Forum Journal.
53d
@Suzianne saidExactly. Idaho comes to Mississippi and tells them how to run their state.?………..
You come to my house and I will shoot your ear off.
We agree….. I should not tell you how to have your furniture and Idaho should not tell Mississippi to run their state different than the way they want to run it. Note in all of this I have not mentioned the federal government , which has nothing to do with any of this.
Congratulations on picking up on logic and common sense. Oh, and the law of the constitution.
53d
@AverageJoe1 said"But, are you in the mood to agree with his saying something is a law, and in the next para, says it is not a law?"
But, are you in the mood to agree with his saying something is a law, and in the next para, says it is not a law?
As to your undecipherable take on the various states, they operate separately you maniac! , but you apply liberal-think that everyone is coooooonnnneeeeeeeeeeeeccctedd.
Learn aspects of individualism, it applies to states as well as people. You are the mobbiest mob person here.
I don't know law, i know marauder knows law and i know you are an idiot. At this point i know enough to say you probably misunderstood again what he patiently explained, like you always do, and i don't know enough to form any other opinion.
Where it someone else i would have said "hmm maybe you should ask him again to explain". But it's you, sooo.... why bother
53d
@KellyJay saidNo, since i am dealing with an idiot, name calling and insults is exactly what i was going for.
So name calling and insults, did you hide a response about the topic in there?
Someone smarter would have figured out there are also arguments between the insults but that's not you, is it? Go ban a book you fascist
53d
@Zahlanzi saidNo one will explain the conflicting statements of Marauder. YOU will not explain the conflicting statements.
"But, are you in the mood to agree with his saying something is a law, and in the next para, says it is not a law?"
I don't know law, i know marauder knows law and i know you are an idiot. At this point i know enough to say you probably misunderstood again what he patiently explained, like you always do, and i don't know enough to form any other opinion.
Where it someon ...[text shortened]... i would have said "hmm maybe you should ask him again to explain". But it's you, sooo.... why bother