@AverageJoe1 saidWe know why y'all want to eliminate the Dept. of Education. We're not stupid.
You will recall my saying for years, to close the dept of education, I was given the Forum Finger, not one of you agreed with me, I will spare u my logic, common sense.
Now, Donald ( I call him Donald) is planning to close the dept of education.
Why do you fellers not get it?
And I made that huge prediction about the election ,back on Nov 4, the day before the ...[text shortened]... ippi students need different curriculum than Idaho students. Your fed dependency leaves me aghast.
Educated voters never would have elected Trump. He'd still be in the dustbin of history, whining and complaining, where he should be.
@KellyJay saidI told u about her Kelly.
You have something to say, say it for crying out loud.
I ‘ll work with you. Rule number one, be careful who you associate with, as all of this is in the cloud till the end of time.
35d
@Suzianne saidWe want to end the department of education, federal, because it will save money, a new concept with which you are unfamiliar.
We know why y'all want to eliminate the Dept. of Education. We're not stupid.
Educated voters never would have elected Trump. He'd still be in the dustbin of history, whining and complaining, where he should be.
Why don’t you make up some reasons that you think we want to end the department, and entertain us royally. Because you will be wrong.
35d
@Suzianne saidSo Kamala would be president of the United States? Do you realize what you are saying? After two or three years have passed, you will say damn… Kamala could not have done this.
We know why y'all want to eliminate the Dept. of Education. We're not stupid.
Educated voters never would have elected Trump. He'd still be in the dustbin of history, whining and complaining, where he should be.
@AverageJoe1 saidAn uneducated population and an uneducated electorate costs FAR more money, especially in the long run, after we have to have repeated impeachment hearings.
We want to end the department of education, federal, because it will save money, a new concept with which you are unfamiliar.
Why don’t you make up some reasons that you think we want to end the department, and entertain us royally. Because you will be wrong.
@AverageJoe1 saidWell, yeah, but after 8 years of Hillary.
So Kamala would be president of the United States? Do you realize what you are saying? After two or three years have passed, you will say damn… Kamala could not have done this.
35d
@Suzianne saidI do not get the first seven words of your paragraph above.
An uneducated population and an uneducated electorate costs FAR more money, especially in the long run, after we have to have repeated impeachment hearings.
A great example of a lib not closing their post. You need to get some shut eye.
@AverageJoe1 saidWord salad. No thanks, not hungry.
So Kamala would be president of the United States? Do you realize what you are saying? After two or three years have passed, you will say damn… Kamala could not have done this.