Debates
26 Oct 22
@sleepyguy saidWell.....Oz did say it without even having a stroke !!
Still banging that one drum, lol.
I guess being religiously dumb doesn't make one unfit for office.
27 Oct 22
@Sleepyguy
Well then, we should make it illegal to let sperm go to waste not impregnating a woman. If all you said was true then lets get to the final story.
@no1marauder saidHe humiliated himself. Far worse than me using the word retard are the people that allowed him to do it, along with those, such as yourself, that defend retard abuse, whether biden or fetterman.
I am grown up enough not to throw around the word "retard" like an 11 year old.
@sleepyguy saidAnd you talk utter 💩 a foetus is a clump of cells that has a parasitic relationship with its host, not unlike the GOP and it’s supporters so I can understand your affinity with the parasite.
@no1marauder
Nope. The magic line is erased. Turns out society gets a say about it because a fetus is a baby and a baby is a person.
@kevcvs57 saidHey Kev, you didn’t answer my other post. Would the $400B be more ‘realistically’ and more morally spent on the wrecked veterans with no limbs, their mortgages, etc, than it would be on the tuition of losers???
And you talk utter 💩 a foetus is a clump of cells that has a parasitic relationship with its host, not unlike the GOP and it’s supporters so I can understand your affinity with the parasite.
If you got to choose, would you choose the veterans, or the college students going into the successful practice of medicine?
Which would you choose?, Kev.
@sleepyguy saidAre there any other religious beliefs of yours you would like codified into the criminal law? Or will that be enough Gilead for now?
@no1marauder
Nope. The magic line is erased. Turns out society gets a say about it because a fetus is a baby and a baby is a person.
Of course, neither Oz or the right wing members of the SCOTUS made such a claim.
@no1marauder saidThat Marauder always always defends the indefensible, (and Fetterman is indefensible), gives one pause.
Was it a stupid remark or not, SG?
To make it worse, it was fairly obviously a prepared one that he thought would sound clever.
An example. His reference to abortion being decided by the states is so easy to understand that I am amazed. If a lot of people live in one area, in this case, a state, all of those people decide what in the hell happens inside their state. In this case abortion was the issue, so one state might say we’re going to do it, and one state might say they are not going to do it. It is decided by the residents of that state. , …it is none of our business what the people in that state decide to do.
This logical point of view is just more than marauder, and other liberals can handle. If you will think this through, you will see the light.
Whew!
@averagejoe1 saidIndividuals have rights, not States.
An example. His reference to abortion being decided by the states is so easy to understand that I am amazed. If a lot of people live in one area, in this case, a state, all of those people decide what in the hell happens inside their state. In this case abortion was the issue, so one state might say we’re going to do it, and one state might say they are not going to do it ...[text shortened]... r, and other liberals can handle. If you will think this through, you will see the light.
Whew!
A simple concept.
@averagejoe1 saidIn 2012, Republican Senator Mark Kirk suffered a stroke and was absent from the Senate for almost a year. Rather than refer to him as a "retard" or find his temporary disability "indefensible" Democrats refrained from such attacks and Vice President Biden was there to greet him upon his return and help him up the Capitol steps.
That Marauder always always defends the indefensible, (and Fetterman is indefensible), gives one pause.
Right wingers should be ashamed of their petty, partisan viciousness.
@averagejoe1 saidBoth Joe but then I don’t have the advantage of being a brainwashed GOP droid who only has to think in binary either or terms.
Hey Kev, you didn’t answer my other post. Would the $400B be more ‘realistically’ and more morally spent on the wrecked veterans with no limbs, their mortgages, etc, than it would be on the tuition of losers???
If you got to choose, would you choose the veterans, or the college students going into the successful practice of medicine?
Which would you choose?, Kev.
@averagejoe1 saidThat’s it’s Joe rip the urine out of a guy recovering from a stroke, it’s always the moral low ground with you guys huh,
I cannot imagine OZ as senator. I definitely imagine Fetterman as one of the 100 senators sending us into the future.I see no reason to not vote Fetterman. Do you?
I read somewhere that a third of US citizens have some sort of disability, this disgusting behaviour might not be the vote magnet you think it is.
@no1marauder saidGet grounded, Marauder,,,,,are you trying to sound like the The Oracle?
Individuals have rights, not States.
A simple concept.
The individuals, within the states, have the rights that are given to them by their respective states. Of course, I am SURE you know, the Constitution gives the rights within each state to....you guessed it...individuals. It would follow that they send whomever to the EC.
Concepts on the Forum do not get more simple than that.
27 Oct 22
@sleepyguy saidWhere’s your magic line? If I get kicked in the nuts should I be able to prosecute for murder of my sperm? Or is it conception - one cell is a baby and a person?
@no1marauder
Nope. The magic line is erased. Turns out society gets a say about it because a fetus is a baby and a baby is a person.