26 Oct 12
Originally posted by FMFSave a goat, starve a troll!
I agree that my two observations are a bit tangential in terms of the debate about Mourdock's abortion remark, but they are certainly pertinent with regard to your pronouncement about you not "depriving someone of the opportunity of life". I don't expect you to agree with me over this. Just making the point that's all.
26 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI would hazzard to guess FMF and his ilk inspired the following thread Thread 149112
get away from me, far far away from me, you are a time waster and my time is too
precious to waste on you troll.
26 Oct 12
Originally posted by utherpendragonSome people do find my questions uncomfortable sometimes, and I cop some flak for it, it's true.
I would hazzard to guess FMF and his ilk inspired the following thread Thread 149112
26 Oct 12
Originally posted by utherpendragonThey are simply best left to their own devices, its an absolute waste of time to engage
I would hazzard to guess FMF and his ilk inspired the following thread Thread 149112
him seriously in any kind of debate, one learns absolutely nothing.
26 Oct 12
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFThe majority of the time they are strawman arguments that you set up. Thats the only thing that is 'uncomfortable' about it. But , you are already aware of this, I am sure. Thats you'r M.O.
Some people do find my questions uncomfortable sometimes, and I cop some flak for it, it's true.
26 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWe do learn - however - how quick you are to simply drop the point of discussion and resort to ad hominems, robbie. We learn how often you cry "troll" when someone disagrees with you. So I don't think to say "one learns absolutely nothing" is right.
They are simply best left to their own devices, its an absolute waste of time to engage
him seriously in any kind of debate, one learns absolutely nothing.
Sorry to everyone else for the off-topic post.
26 Oct 12
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFyes we learn to stay away from time wasters, its the course of wisdom, my bad.
We do learn - however - how quick you are to simply drop the point of discussion and resort to ad hominems, robbie. We learn how often you cry "troll" when someone disagrees with you. So I don't think to say "one learns absolutely nothing" is right.
Sorry to everyone else for the off-topic post.
26 Oct 12
1 edit
Originally posted by normbenign
I see a serious defect in how much interest a comment of a single Indiana candidate for Congress generates, compared to the seeming lack of interest in how the President, CIA, and State Department acted and reacted to a terrorist attack on the Embassy in Bengazi, Libya.
Four adult Americans dead, in a 7 hour long attack, and nothing but lies and dissembling from the government agencies that are supposed to know and respond.
Four adult Americans dead, in a 7 hour long attack, and nothing but lies and dissembling from the government agencies that are supposed to know and respond.-normbenign
So true. With all the recent developments in this scandal/cover up in the last 24 hours, it deserves it's own thread. Go ahead Norm, start it off. Its sure to get hundreds of comments by the Obamanite kool-aid drinkers and us "whacky right wingers". 🙂
26 Oct 12
Originally posted by utherpendragonThat thread you gave a link to is about seeking to remove people from the web site's forums altogether.
I would hazzard to guess FMF and his ilk inspired the following thread Thread 149112
26 Oct 12
Originally posted by utherpendragonNo, it's about people being banned from the forums using some sort of 'by popular demand' mechanism. Presumably you'd read the thread if you thought to link to it. It's kind of ironic that there should be any suggestion - however tongue in cheek, or however said-in-irritation - that a defender of free speech as staunch as me should perhaps be banned from the forums.
OH ! God forbid. I would never want that to happen to you buddy. I thought it was just about pressing a little troll icon button to click on.
27 Oct 12
Originally posted by utherpendragonDo you believe abortion should be legal in those rare cases you list? Also, do you think that a rape victim on her own or as part of her initial medical exam and treatment in response to the rape, have the option to take the morning-after pill?
The three most frequently cited “hard cases” in which some argue abortion might be justified are rape, incest and protecting the life of the mother. However, women rarely report that they are seeking an abortion for any of these reasons:
Rape: 0.3%
Incest: 0.03%
Protection of mother’s life: 0.2%
In other words, out of 1,000 women procu ...[text shortened]... ad more: Abortion Facts - Abortion Facts http://www.whyprolife.com/abortion-facts/#ixzz2AOV8qvBX