Is homosexuality a perversion?

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
your time shall not be wasted anymore o great scum of the earth. you are from now on free to crawl through the hate you call an existence. and of course, i do hope your son turns out to be gay. karma and all that. live long and prosper oh he with red neck.

"To think that I should literally execute the person next to me is very childish"
the one next t ...[text shortened]... ou will execute him yourself, assure him that his executioner will be around shortly. or not.

more bulls**t from the most childish poster here...

Originally posted by generalissimo
more bulls**t from the most childish poster here...

whatever you say sir scum.

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
whatever you say sir scum.

I made my point, its up to you and others here to think about it.

I think I've had enough of your wah-wah.

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
really? you serious? you honestly believe that "i am worthier to live than the guy next to me " is a valid human sentiment? that we should let people die or save them based on the choices they made in life?

All good in theory but in the real world, try your local ER room, which because of reality, will have finite resources and capacity, and check out the moral dilemmas that continuously develop.when you have to triage patients and work out who you can save.

Will it be the 70 year old judge with suspected massive internal haemorrhaging from the auto wreck, who also reeks of alcohol, or should it be the crack ho who's losing blood fast through an external trauma brought on by stab wounds as a result of a violent case of domestic abuse, or should the kid with aids who has been a juvie hall favourite all his life get the resources to stabilise their rapid deterioration due to renal complications as a result of alphabet hepatitis , or should the overweight slob who is short of breath and is possibly seconds away from a massive coronary get the support?

Originally posted by kmax87
All good in theory but in the real world, try your local ER room, which because of reality, will have finite resources and capacity, and check out the moral dilemmas that continuously develop.when you have to triage patients and work out who you can save.

Will it be the 70 year old judge with suspected massive internal haemorrhaging from the auto wreck, wh ...[text shortened]... ob who is short of breath and is possibly seconds away from a massive coronary get the support?

first come first served or in the order of severity of injuries.

who are you to play god? i will ask you the same question i asked sir. will you execute them yourself, will you put someone else to do it or will you let them to die?

do you like a scenario when in every hospital there is a worthiness officer who get to live or die based on motives other than medical? maybe it will be a republican turning away all democrats. or turning away someone who had a history of protesting against the government.

of course, if your example ilustrates how we cannot save them all and we must choose, fine, i agree, as long as we choose the one most likely to survive. fine, don't treat the old man, treat the kid, the old man is a gonner and the kid has a chance. but when a gangbanger arrives at the hospital, you are bound by your oath as a doctor to treat him, not let him die because a much less severe hurt law-abiding citizen is waiting for treatment.