Go back
Operation Paperclip

Operation Paperclip

Debates

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
19 Aug 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain
And YOU avoid actual debate by pushing ultrarightwingnutjob sites.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
19 Aug 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
And YOU avoid actual debate by pushing ultrarightwingnutjob sites.
Still not proving it.

Most people on here are not stupid. They can see that if I was half as bad as you claim I would be easy to prove wrong.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
19 Aug 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain
THAT is the problem. You don't even REALIZE when you are dead wrong.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
20 Aug 21

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
THAT is the problem. You don't even REALIZE when you are dead wrong.
Because you never prove I am wrong. You don't even try. Or perhaps you do try and you are frustrated because you keep failing. That is a pretty good indication you are dead wrong.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
21 Aug 21
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain
There is a huge difference between proof and acceptance. We put actual proof out there and you think you win the argument by just saying 'you proved NOTHING' and just go on about your business, without actually going deeper into the proof and tearing it apart like a real debate is supposed to go but all you have are pitifully small words like that, YOU LIE or some such.

THAT is not debate.

You and millions of other deluded folks probably believe every word puked out by Tucker Carlsen and the like and you actually think he is unbiased.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
21 Aug 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
There is a huge difference between proof and acceptance. We put actual proof out there and you think you win the argument by just saying 'you proved NOTHING' and just go on about your business, without actually going deeper into the proof and tearing it apart like a real debate is supposed to go but all you have are pitifully small words like that, YOU LIE or s ...[text shortened]... y believe every word puked out by Tucker Carlsen and the like and you actually think he is unbiased.
Demonstrate one example where you put out proof. You are the liar.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89787
Clock
21 Aug 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Still not proving it.

Most people on here are not stupid. They can see that if I was half as bad as you claim I would be easy to prove wrong.
You are proven wrong. Time and time again.
And only you believe you’re not wrong and that it is not proven.

You’re completely dillusional.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
21 Aug 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
You are proven wrong. Time and time again.
And only you believe you’re not wrong and that it is not proven.

You’re completely dillusional.
Demonstrate one example where you put out proof. Everybody knows you can't.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89787
Clock
22 Aug 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Demonstrate one example where you put out proof. Everybody knows you can't.
Vaccines.
Isolation of the virus.

A few examples. And only you choose to call it non-proven.

It’s what I’ve told you: you are dillusional.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
22 Aug 21

@shavixmir said
Vaccines.
Isolation of the virus.

A few examples. And only you choose to call it non-proven.

It’s what I’ve told you: you are dillusional.
You never put out proof about that. You are still lying about isolation.

Isn't the Journal Nature a good enough source for ya?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
22 Aug 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain
The only thing YOU have is DIS-acceptance. It doesn't matter WHAT we present, it will be pronounced fake news by you.
You don't debate. You put up ultrabiased rightwingnutjob websites you think supports your POV but in fact are just ultrarightwingnuts putting out misinformation and downright lies.
And you are ok with that since you don't live on planet Earth but in some kind of mental state requiring strict adherence to the Trump line of bullshyte.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89787
Clock
22 Aug 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
You never put out proof about that. You are still lying about isolation.

Isn't the Journal Nature a good enough source for ya?
I did. You ignore it. You need medication.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
23 Aug 21

@shavixmir said
I did. You ignore it. You need medication.
Partial SARS-CoV-2 sequences from early outbreaks in Wuhan were removed from a US government database by the scientists who deposited them.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01731-3

You are a science denier. The Journal Nature is one of the most respected science journals there is. Sonhouse knows that too. He is another science denier that thinks he stands for science. He is just too stupid to know better.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89787
Clock
23 Aug 21

@metal-brain said
Partial SARS-CoV-2 sequences from early outbreaks in Wuhan were removed from a US government database by the scientists who deposited them.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01731-3

You are a science denier. The Journal Nature is one of the most respected science journals there is. Sonhouse knows that too. He is another science denier that thinks he stands for science. He is just too stupid to know better.
What has that article got to do with operation paperclip?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
24 Aug 21

@shavixmir said
What has that article got to do with operation paperclip?
You brought it up. You gave an example that was not a verifiable example. You did not prove me wrong at all. You were lying again.

Partial SARS-CoV-2 sequences from early outbreaks in Wuhan were removed from a US government database by the scientists who deposited them.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01731-3

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.