04 Apr 23
@metal-brain saidI'm already assuming a big VAERS undercount in my 1 in 100,000 estimate.
Good.
The CDC said VAERS is only a fraction of adverse events that are reported.
That means take the VAERS data number and at least double it.
@sh76 saidVAERS contradicts your 1 in 100,000 estimate.
I'm already assuming a big VAERS undercount in my 1 in 100,000 estimate.
@wajoma saidMy mom has had all shots, boosters and the first in her area to get it again then a year or so later again? My brother same had it twice? I’ve never had the shot or mask or issues besides normal stuff stomach bug etc.?
1/ Didn't stop you from catcing wuflu.
2/ Didn't stop you from passing wuflu on.
3/ Didn't stop you from getting extremely sick from the wuflu
4/ In some cases was more harmful than wuflu
5/ Was actually fatal for some people
scurry away and find a definition for snakeoil salesman dolt boy.
@metal-brain saidLordy. After all the time you spent digging into VAERS data you still haven't read the website?
VAERS contradicts your 1 in 100,000 estimate.
"The number of reports cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and adverse events, or as evidence about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines."
Why do you insist on overinterpreting VAERS reporting?
@metal-brain saidLink, please?
VAERS contradicts your 1 in 100,000 estimate.
Which numbers are you referring to?
@wildgrass saidI would imagine that almost 100% of deaths occur within just a few weeks of eating bread.
Lordy. After all the time you spent digging into VAERS data you still haven't read the website?
"The number of reports cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and adverse events, or as evidence about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines."
Why do you insist on overinterpreting VAERS reporting?
That BAERS data looks downright grizzly.
@mike69 saidI had three shots. Never got sick.
My mom has had all shots, boosters and the first in her area to get it again then a year or so later again? My brother same had it twice? I’ve never had the shot or mask or issues besides normal stuff stomach bug etc.?
04 Apr 23
@athousandyoung saidI've had four. Ditto.
I had three shots. Never got sick.
And here, from a reputable site, is the story about graphene oxide supposedly being in vaccines:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/graphene-oxide-mrna-vaccines/
Or try Forbes:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/?sh=35ef502c74d7
The Pfizer document that is out there clearly states that graphene oxide is used to test the vaccine as part of the manufacturing process.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/03/28/fact-check-document-shows-graphene-used-test-covid-19-vaccine-not-make/11556190002/
The chemical is not put into doses. Never. Not once. Ever. Total lie. But I'll bet the myth sells a lot of dodgy and expen$ive $upplement$. Just look at Metal Twit's first link in the OP. Wade past the crazy stuff about "cosmic energy," and how the 5G mobile network frequency just so happens to somehow "activate" graphene oxide. Yum.
It all started with some crank in the middle of 2021 saying unfounded crap on Instagram, and from there the tinfoil-hat brigade mustered its most basement-bound dipsticks to elaborate and perpetuate the myth over the next two years.
@metal-brain saidIt's in the portion of the Pfizer document depicted in your own link, dumbass. Highlighted in blue, with a big yellow arrow pointing at it.
"That first link to shitplan.com or whatever presents not a shred of evidence that graphene oxide is "in" the Covid vaccines. It's used in the manufacture of the vaccine, which is no secret."
No secret? This is the first time I have heard it.
What is your source of information?
Trash-peddling douchebags like you are why we can't have nice things.
@athousandyoung saidSo I guess that means they are as they say they are?
I had three shots. Never got sick.
How do you know you would not have gotten sick without it also?
@soothfast saidTrash peddling douche bags like you are the reason people are looking for ways to get the poison out of their system.
It's in the portion of the Pfizer document depicted in your own link, dumbass. Highlighted in blue, with a big yellow arrow pointing at it.
Trash-peddling douchebags like you are why we can't have nice things.
Remember, these are people who tried your snake oil.
@wajoma said200 million people died during the black death plague and they collectively complained a lot less than these conservative snowflakes from their air conditioned hospital beds.
Trash peddling douche bags like you are the reason people are looking for ways to get the poison out of their system.
Remember, these are people who tried your snake oil.
@soothfast saidFact checkers are mere opinion pieces I have proven wrong plenty of times.
I've had four. Ditto.
And here, from a reputable site, is the story about graphene oxide supposedly being in vaccines:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/graphene-oxide-mrna-vaccines/
Or try Forbes:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer-covid-19-vaccines-here-are-the-latest-unsupported-claims/?sh=35ef502c74d7
The Pfi ...[text shortened]... ered its most basement-bound dipsticks to elaborate and perpetuate the myth over the next two years.
You have to prove it using the Pfizer documents. You have not done that.
https://www.jacksonville.com/story/news/2012/09/28/fact-check-so-whos-checking-fact-finders-we-are/984146007/
Fact checkers often lie. They did that about gene therapy by falsely claiming it has to change DNA. That is a lie.