Go back
Poor, stupid smokers?

Poor, stupid smokers?

Debates

o
Paralysed analyst

On a ship of fools

Joined
26 May 04
Moves
25780
Clock
11 Oct 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Finish high school.
Do not have children before you are married.
Work full time at a job.
1. Requires a functioning school with well-trained teachers, textbooks and facilities. Especially in America where entry into higher education is so relentlessly competitive.

2. While I personally believe that sex should be kept within marriage, your sweeping statement is completely out of touch with modern reality. There are millionaires with children who've never got married. I suspect what you really mean is 'do not have children too young'.

3. Requires a job to be available. An area is poor because most people in it don't have much money. The main reason they don't have much money is because they don't have jobs. The main reason they don't have jobs is because there aren't enough available in the area. You'd be amazed how much the wealth of a community is affected by major employers either opening or closing nearby.

s
Death from Above

El Paso, TX

Joined
27 Oct 02
Moves
47338
Clock
11 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Varg
Research has identified the region of England with the highest percentage of smokers - 53% are smokers.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/humber/6039414.stm
Coincidentally (?) it is also one of the poorest and "deprived" areas.
It has been pointed out that a 20- a day habit costs £1,600 to £1,800 a year!!
Now, to me this doesn't sound very smart - this is ...[text shortened]... pid because they are poor, are they poor and stupid because they smoke?

Seems crazy to me.
What about the rich smoking those $10.00 or more cigars. I smoked cigarrettes and I make a six figure salary how do you explain that?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
11 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Varg
Research has identified the region of England with the highest percentage of smokers - 53% are smokers.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/humber/6039414.stm
Coincidentally (?) it is also one of the poorest and "deprived" areas.
It has been pointed out that a 20- a day habit costs £1,600 to £1,800 a year!!
Now, to me this doesn't sound very smart - this is ...[text shortened]... pid because they are poor, are they poor and stupid because they smoke?

Seems crazy to me.
Cigarettes are far cheaper entertainment than many other options. For a few dollars you get a whole pack and get a nice little high!

t

Joined
21 Feb 04
Moves
20783
Clock
11 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Cigarettes are far cheaper entertainment than many other options. For a few dollars you get a whole pack and get a nice little high!
Especially if you space them out and make the first drag count!

V
Thinking...

Odersfelt

Joined
20 Jan 03
Moves
14580
Clock
11 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by slimjim
What about the rich smoking those $10.00 or more cigars. I smoked cigarrettes and I make a six figure salary how do you explain that?
Sounds like you could afford it, though.
Of course rich people smoke, but I'm sure if you were in a situation where you were desperate for cash then you'd cut out $10 cigars.

V
Thinking...

Odersfelt

Joined
20 Jan 03
Moves
14580
Clock
11 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by treetalk
Especially if you space them out and make the first drag count!
Or if you smoke rollies and re-roll the butts so you never waste any.

c
Islamofascists Suck!

Macon, Georgia, CSA

Joined
17 Feb 02
Moves
32132
Clock
12 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
And the difference between these policies and the people who suck are???
It depends on if you swallow or not....what the F*** are you asking?

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
12 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Based on their ads for high-cost luxury goods, I’d bet that the readers of “Cigar Aficionado” are quite wealthy. Ultimately though, smoking is not an issue of rich or poor, it’s an issue of freedom of choice. I don’t need the nanny state intruding into my personal business.

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
12 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Based on their ads for high-cost luxury goods, I’d bet that the readers of “Cigar Aficionado” are quite wealthy. Ultimately though, smoking is not an issue of rich or poor, it’s an issue of freedom of choice. I don’t need the nanny state intruding into my personal business.
What about when your personal business involves the health of the people around you?

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107164
Clock
12 Oct 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chancremechanic
It depends on if you swallow or not....what the F*** are you asking?
I was referring to your forum setting self proclaimed title.🙄

edit: your title refers to some fascistic suction

then you observe that:- Lock up all violent criminals for life or place them on a remote Island and let them govern themselves. Drop pedophiles/child murderers from 10,000 ft. w/o a parachute, chop off all rapist's hands and penises, petty thieves are relegated to the chain-gang, cleaning up the streets and roadways....second offenders are sent to prison for life...

to which I replied:-
And the difference between these policies and the people who suck are???

t

Joined
13 Oct 05
Moves
12505
Clock
12 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ullr
We learned from the never ending gun control debate on this forum that the English are more concerned with saving lives than us stupid Americans. It says in the article that ""Smoking is the biggest killer in England"

So that being the case why have the English, with their superior intellect, not banned smoking?
Ah. Thats because the Government gets around £5 billion a year through taxation on cigarrettes. This is more than they spend on health care for smoking related illnesses (sorry, i can't remember where i read that ). If they banned smoking, this would seriously affect the uk's economy.

This is why they keep encouraging smoking by telling smokers to stop. They know this is a good way to get a smoker to light up a ciggy. Clever huh?

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107164
Clock
12 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ullr
We learned from the never ending gun control debate on this forum that the English are more concerned with saving lives than us stupid Americans. It says in the article that ""Smoking is the biggest killer in England"

So that being the case why have the English, with their superior intellect, not banned smoking?
Because they can enjoy the experience of dying a lot more luxuriously and languidly than those who prefer popping caps into each other.

S
Bah Humbug!

C:\Drive

Joined
28 Feb 04
Moves
13274
Clock
12 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FrenchQueen
Exactly, they've got their priorities completely wrong.. Oh yes, I've noticed the satellite dishes too and the flashy mobile phones and bikes that a lot of the poor kids have; it's all about status, and come to think of it, the Poor are possibly the most materialistic group. Then when people get ill through smoking, we pick up the bill for all the expensive NHS treatments etc . . . 😞
You seem to be suggesting its much cheaper to treat non-smokers for cancer, alzheimers, heart disease, kidney failure, aids, ... etc?
Accidents aside, everyone dies of some ailment or other and it all costs, whether its smoking related or not - it just happens sooner for smokers.

h

Cosmos

Joined
21 Jan 04
Moves
11184
Clock
13 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by twiceaknight
Ah. Thats because the Government gets around £5 billion a year through taxation on cigarrettes. This is more than they spend on health care for smoking related illnesses (sorry, i can't remember where i read that ). If they banned smoking, this would seriously affect the uk's economy.

This is why they keep encouraging smoking by telling smokers to stop. They know this is a good way to get a smoker to light up a ciggy. Clever huh?
...and the beauty of it all is that the NHS can refuse treatment on the grounds that the patient is a smoker. Neat huh?

Ullr

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
123634
Clock
13 Oct 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
Because they can enjoy the experience of dying a lot more luxuriously and languidly than those who prefer popping caps into each other.
Heh. I have to admit that makes perfectly good sense.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.