@jj-adams saidComparing it to the fate of the proposed Westway in Manhattan, I have to say that you might be right about that.
You people are stupid.
Joe's point was that if we had the regulations of today back in the 30's, Hoover Dam would never have been built.
Instead it was built and completed for less than the proposed budget and in less time than predicted, an unheard of thing for a gigantic govt project.
@jj-adams saidDuring a Democrat's administration.
You people are stupid.
Joe's point was that if we had the regulations of today back in the 30's, Hoover Dam would never have been built.
Instead it was built and completed for less than the proposed budget and in less time than predicted, an unheard of thing for a gigantic govt project.
Duh.
@AverageJoe1
Right. Your form of humor is like telling the joke about the black dude covered in chains and thrown into a river to drown and they go, look at that, that 'n word' trying to swim away with more chain than he can steal.
That is why we object to your kind of so-called humor.
Just like a hundred or more years ago when my Irish ancestors were the butt of jokes or Asians working on railroads generating more racists jokes.
Your "humor" is in the same vein but of course not directly racist, just you showing the world you don't like progressives.
Also BTW, those billions of kilowatts of power may go down the tubes anyway do to the drought, it is already under threat of loss of power because the water is so far down so it matters little WHO is against or for the dam, nature will take its own form of revenge.
Also btw, the entire idea of dams forming huge lakes changes totally the bio diversity of the region and not for the better.
I like humor as much as the next guy but try to do it without the implications of racism or cultural bias.
It sounds like you are saying, look at those stupid progressives, they actually think they can stop a billion kilowatt dam. Wow, there was actually a song about that sung by Frank Sinatra but in that song they were not casting aspersions on some group, in your case political.
If I want to cast aspersions I don't make jokes, I go right at the throat and spell it out plainly as you well know.
@averagejoe1 saidDoes anyone find it odd that BIDEN's
A hydroelectric dam, which would provide a tremendous amount of electricity to our western states, will likely never be built, due to roadblocks of government regulations, and a plethora of liberal obstructionists in the name of environment, noise, fumes, and eradication of pet walks and yoga gardens.
Court filings will be years in the process.
Build Back Better plan, that would have
fixed our crumbling infrastructure, probably including
some fix ups and maintenance on,
the 90 year old, 'Hoover Dam,' was decried by Joe and his ilk.
Blame two Democrats, will 'ya?
There were 48 Republicans voted no too.
WE AREN'T THE OBSTRUCTIONISTS TO PROGRESS
..............''OH, THE IRONY.''
@jj-adams saidGotta' bring you to the race track'
You people are stupid.
Joe's point was that if we had the regulations of today back in the 30's, Hoover Dam would never have been built.
Instead it was built and completed for less than the proposed budget and in less time than predicted, an unheard of thing for a gigantic govt project.
How do you know this............Opinion, not backed by evidence.
@jimm619 saidAlso missed this from earlier, but why's it called the Hoover Dam when it was built during the Coolidge administration? Joe neglected to mention that after it was first proposed in 1922 the Hoover Dam did take almost a decade of political and legal maneuverings before it broke ground.
Does anyone find it odd that BIDEN's
Build Back Better plan, that would have
fixed our crumbling infrastructure, probably including
some fix ups and maintenance on,
the 90 year old, 'Hoover Dam,' was decried by Joe and his ilk.
Blame two Democrats, will 'ya?
There were 48 Republicans voted no too.
WE AREN'T THE OBSTRUCTIONISTS TO PROGRESS
..............''OH, THE IRONY.''
@wildgrass saidI imagine because it was started
Also missed this from earlier, but why's it called the Hoover Dam when it was built during the Coolidge administration? Joe neglected to mention that after it was first proposed in 1922 the Hoover Dam did take almost a decade of political and legal maneuverings before it broke ground.
during The Hoover Administration.
Coolidge was a one term president,
the dam took 7years to build.
Roosevelt's WPA finished the project,
as you mention, 'under budget, in record time.'
It was originally called, 'The Boulder Dam.'
@jimm619 saidSo is the Wall. A lot of poster boards in the streets, replete with bull horns. Con't get you there.
Is that what you call humor?
Most people would see it for
what it actually is. Smarmy, cynical,
mean spirited sarcasm......What's funny?
William F. Buckley was good at this ploy,
Your attempt at humorous sarcasm
measures up as, truly, less than average, Joe.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
BYW, originally called The Boulder Dam,
it was funded completely by The US Govt.
@jj-adams saidThankyou JJ Adams. They will now revisit and reflect on my point. I'd hated for it to get lost in the vehemence.
You people are stupid.
Joe's point was that if we had the regulations of today back in the 30's, Hoover Dam would never have been built.
Instead it was built and completed for less than the proposed budget and in less time than predicted, an unheard of thing for a gigantic govt project.
@suzianne saidYes, you'd said that already. So what?
During a Democrat's administration.
Duh.
@jimm619 saidAnd, the BBB plan would have ';fixed;' inflation at 25% instead of 9%. This is a fact....but you fellers dont watch the real news
Does anyone find it odd that BIDEN's
Build Back Better plan, that would have
fixed our crumbling infrastructure, probably including
some fix ups and maintenance on,
the 90 year old, 'Hoover Dam,' was decried by Joe and his ilk.
Blame two Democrats, will 'ya?
There were 48 Republicans voted no too.
WE AREN'T THE OBSTRUCTIONISTS TO PROGRESS
..............''OH, THE IRONY.''