Originally posted by normbenignAgreed, so why not do the military drills at about that place that an attack south of the DMZ would likely take place?
The attack though from the north was still near the southern border, where the Iraqi forces were.
Surprise or not, it is doubtful that any action would be far from the DMZ, just as it is doubtful that any serious chess opening doesn't involve challenging the center.
Originally posted by Metal BrainIt's not the duty of the President at all to discuss military tactics in detail.
And you do?
I want to hear someone ask Obama why he needs the military drills to be done in disputed waters and I want to hear Obama answer the question. You are not qualified to answer for him and it is Obama's duty as president to answer questions when nuclear war is threatened. I'll settle for Jay Carney though. That is his job.
Originally posted by Metal BrainQuite a bit more than you.
And you do?
I want to hear someone ask Obama why he needs the military drills to be done in disputed waters and I want to hear Obama answer the question. You are not qualified to answer for him and it is Obama's duty as president to answer questions when nuclear war is threatened. I'll settle for Jay Carney though. That is his job.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraWho is asking for a lot of details? Someone should ask him why he is stubborn about doing military drills in disputed waters and why we can't do them further south. If he wants to play the "classified military tactics card" he can always give the same reply that you did, but we deserve to hear it. Nuclear war is serious stuff.
It's not the duty of the President at all to discuss military tactics in detail.
Originally posted by Metal BrainI'm sure the President has better things to do then try to coddle to spastic drama queens.
Who is asking for a lot of details? Someone should ask him why he is stubborn about doing military drills in disputed waters and why we can't do them further south. If he wants to play the "classified military tactics card" he can always give the same reply that you did, but we deserve to hear it. Nuclear war is serious stuff.
Kim Jong-un would be beating the drum no matter how far south the training takes place. I'm sure his real problem is the new sanctions the UN approved.
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperSanctions almost never work to accomplish the stated goals. All they do is increase the suffering of innocent civilians who have little say so in their country's policies.
I'm sure the President has better things to do then try to coddle to spastic drama queens.
Kim Jong-un would be beating the drum no matter how far south the training takes place. I'm sure his real problem is the new sanctions the UN approved.
The real reason for sanctions most of the time is to weaken a country before an invasion. The UN is a farce. The USA can usually get the votes they want with incentives and economic threats. Sometimes the USA government will literally buy votes.
Originally posted by Metal BrainYes, I'm sure Obama is bribing Putin and Xi Jinping all the time.
Sanctions almost never work to accomplish the stated goals. All they do is increase the suffering of innocent civilians who have little say so in their country's policies.
The real reason for sanctions most of the time is to weaken a country before an invasion. The UN is a farce. The USA can usually get the votes they want with incentives and economic threats. Sometimes the USA government will literally buy votes.
What a bizarre world you live in.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraBush tried to bribe nations into supporting UN approval of the Iraq war before the invasion. I'm not making it up. I'm very serious.
Yes, I'm sure Obama is bribing Putin and Xi Jinping all the time.
What a bizarre world you live in.
This is a bizarre world and you live in it too. Just because you are unaware of these things does not make them untrue.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/dec/17/usa.internationalaidanddevelopment
http://www.monitor.net/monitor/0305a/copyright/bushunsanctions3.html
Originally posted by Metal BrainRussia and China have veto powers at the UN, and were adamantly against the invasion. Can you provide a link to these bribery attempts?
Bush tried to bribe nations into supporting UN approval of the Iraq war before the invasion. I'm not making it up. I'm very serious.
This is a bizarre world and you live in it too. Just because you are unaware of these things does not make them untrue.
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperBush was not successful in getting UN approval, but he did try.
Russia and China have veto powers at the UN, and were adamantly against the invasion. Can you provide a link to these bribery attempts?
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2003/03/un-m06.html
http://www.newstatesman.com/node/143829
Originally posted by Metal BrainI'm talking about those particular countries (Russia and France). Perhaps the Bush administration did attempt to bribe the poor countries who depend on foreign aid. I have nothing but disdain for Bush, but I would need to look into it further before I accept such a scandalous claim to be true.
Bush was not successful in getting UN approval, but he did try.
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2003/03/un-m06.html
http://www.newstatesman.com/node/143829
The point is the countries that actually have power and influence within the UN aren't so easily bribed and getting them to agree on anything remotely controversial is almost impossible.
The fact that the UN acted against NK isn't insignificant.
And by the way, ALL of South Korea is "contested" territory, so on what basis do you claim Kim Jong-un is only throwing a fit because the training is "close to their border"? In every report I read he's making threats because the exercise it taking place at all.
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperI must admit I have not read any of the links I posted and cannot vouch for the accuracy of the information on them. I am only going by memory of the Bush push for war with Iraq. I was very much opposed to that war from the beginning and I recalled the attempted bribery issue from long ago.
I'm talking about those particular countries (Russia and France). Perhaps the Bush administration did attempt to bribe the poor countries who depend on foreign aid. I have nothing but disdain for Bush, but I would need to look into it further before I accept such a scandalous claim to be true.
The point is the countries that actually have power ...[text shortened]... In every report I read he's making threats because the exercise it taking place at all.
I realize none of the links are from Reuters or the NY Times and I understand your skepticism. Like I said before, Bush was not successful in getting a UN resolution passed for invading Iraq. He wanted one badly though. It would have given some legitimacy for the war instead of merely unilateral action.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/3661134.stm
I know NK has a horrible human rights record and I don't condone the regime's domestic policies just as I don't condone China's horrible human rights record. China does human organ harvesting from prisoners to sell to the highest bidders. very repugnant.
I often play devil's advocate on the debate forum just to see how far I can take the debate. It has been interesting. I think this has nearly run it's course though. Not much more to debate.
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperIt is interesting that the issue of classified (secret) tactical information, and doing exercises right under the nose of a projected enemy seem to be in direct conflict.
I'm talking about those particular countries (Russia and France). Perhaps the Bush administration did attempt to bribe the poor countries who depend on foreign aid. I have nothing but disdain for Bush, but I would need to look into it further before I accept such a scandalous claim to be true.
The point is the countries that actually have power ...[text shortened]... In every report I read he's making threats because the exercise it taking place at all.