SCOTUS Blocks Vax Mandates

@no1marauder said
Actually my argument is quite the opposite; it is AJ who keeps insisting the decision was based on some "right".

Both Sh and I agree it was, instead, based on an interpretation of Congressional intent when it passed the law creating OSHA with the difference being he apparently agrees with that interpretation and I most certainly do not (in fact, I find it quite implausible based on the law's text).

It is well and good that you write with an air of the erudite, but I prefer to write as above, more understandable.

@averagejoe1 said
The lib justices focused very much on the outcome of the mandates. 'How could it be in the public interest?' This question does not appear to involve a whole lot of law, which is what SCOTUS is supposed to consider. Esp Lib Justice Breyer, they let emotion creep in. Where is the legal argument?? They seem to be going along with anything so long as you can put a "public ...[text shortened]... this reasoning.

As to 'rights' which I mention, everyone has a right, today, to not take the vax.

From the OSH Act of 1970:

"The Secretary shall provide, without regard to the requirements of chapter 5, title 5, Unites States Code, for an emergency temporary standard to take immediate effect upon publication in the Federal Register if he determines --

(A)
that employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from new hazards, and

(B)
that such emergency standard is necessary to protect employees from such danger."

Section (c). https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/oshact/completeoshact

Could anything be possibly more clear? Congress explicitly gave the Secretary of Labor the authority to enact emergency measures to protect employees from "new hazards" that imposed "grave dangers" to them. COVID has killed over 800,000 Americans already and will kill thousands more because of this poorly reasoned SCOTUS decision. It surely poses a "grave danger" to workers and reducing its spread by requiring workers to be vaccinated or tested is a quite rational response to such a danger.

@averagejoe1 said
It is well and good that you write with an air of the erudite, but I prefer to write as above, more understandable.

Ignorance is bliss........

@averagejoe1 said
So my wife ran over one of my dogs, but SHE DIDNT RUN OVER BOTH OF THEM.
Geez O Petey.

What a maroon.....

@mott-the-hoople said
dont you have some masterbating to catch up on?

There 'ya go again.

@earl-of-trumps said
Hello, @sonhouse.. is that you?

So tell me vivify, why are you throwing these mean spirited insults all around?

Make you feel like a man,,,?
make you feel superior??

I think you suck when you do this, dooshery

Earl of Trumps, just yesterday:

you lying filthbag piece of crap, go f yourself

you're a racist, a bigot, a liar and a hater.

Few traits are worse than hypocrisy.

@vivify said
Earl of Trumps to Suzianne:

you lying filthbag piece of crap, go f yourself

you're a racist, a bigot, a liar and a hater.

Few traits are worse than hypocrisy.

Five thumbs up

@mott-the-hoople said
dont you have some masterbating to catch up on?

Since you are a conservative church going patriot, perhaps a visit to a confessional might be in order ?
Maybe trim your mullet first. 😛

@mghrn55 said
Since you are a conservative church going patriot, perhaps a visit to a confessional might be in order ?
Maybe trim your mullet first. 😛

Ha, ha, 😆

@mott-the-hoople said
you do realize Trump was found innocent in both impeachments dont you?

Voting to acquit doesn't miraculously make one "innocent".

It means his acolytes refused to do their Constitutional duty.

@jimm619 said
Five thumbs up

mine was simply reactionary to a know liar's libeling of me.
leave me free of lies and libel and ad hominims etc, and I'll be fine.

not true with the aggressive killer bee liberals here. they HUNT people down

@suzianne said
Voting to acquit doesn't miraculously make one "innocent".

It means his acolytes refused to do their Constitutional duty.

Just like SCOTUS didn't do their duty with the Mandates decision!!. What is wrong with those people! A few days ago, Suzianne implied, in re the Manchin matter, that 'govt employees' (my words) like Manchin and SCOTUS need to do what the hell the president wants them to do.
Yep, Sue, they just won't do their jobs. Should Be in Lock-step. Like, the Hitler youth, or those hordes of NKorean citizens paying perfect image to their dear leader.
Why can't we all be alike and just get along. I should find you and give you my stuff. Be a good American.

@suzianne said
Voting to acquit doesn't miraculously make one "innocent".

It means his acolytes refused to do their Constitutional duty.

hey liar-in-chief, until your commie thugs take over, it is spelled a-c-q-u-i-t

@earl-of-trumps said
hey liar-in-chief

Why are you throwing these mean spirited insults all around?

Make you feel like a man,,,?
make you feel superior??

@averagejoe1 said
Just like SCOTUS didn't do their duty with the Mandates decision!!. What is wrong with those people! A few days ago, Suzianne implied, in re the Manchin matter, that 'govt employees' (my words) like Manchin and SCOTUS need to do what the hell the president wants them to do.
Yep, Sue, they just won't do their jobs. Should Be in Lock-step. Like, the Hitler youth, o ...[text shortened]... 't we all be alike and just get along. I should find you and give you my stuff. Be a good American.

It really escapes my sensibilities
that anyone could celebrate a decision
that will, ultimately, cost us tens of
thousands of lives.........
Can anyone explain?