@boonon said"Your scientists"? As if this was said by some guy I watch on YouTube?
I suppose this came from one of your scientist. I am not your buddy by the way. You are the embarrassment.
Do you know what a scientific law is? You clearly don't for you to say something that dumb.
Again: Look up Conservation of Mass or the Conservation of Energy. These are scientific laws, not opinions.
Matter always existed in some form. Your assumptions about the Big Bang being "something from nothing" are fundamentally wrong.
- Joined
- 30 Dec 04
- Moves
- 97400
303d
@vivify saidSCIENCE is never a law. Science is always changing from the new things we learn. So if we were back in the 1700's you would 'bleed' someone to get rid of their illness, killing them from blood loss because the science of the day dictated it. My gosh yu are a nit wit.
"Your scientists"? As if this was said by some guy I watch on YouTube?
Do you know what a scientific law is? You clearly don't for you to say something that dumb.
Again: Look up Conservation of Mass or the Conservation of Energy. These are scientific laws, not opinions.
Matter always existed in some form. Your assumptions about the Big Bang being "something from nothing" are fundamentally wrong.
- Joined
- 30 Dec 04
- Moves
- 97400
303d
@vivify saidListen, I really don't care if you do not believe in a creator. You actually have more faith than I do that we came from something that always existed but had no creator. That is fundamentally illogical. You can choose to believe in nothing, I really could care less, but don't tell me that matter always existed because you or any scientist is merely guessing.
"Your scientists"? As if this was said by some guy I watch on YouTube?
Do you know what a scientific law is? You clearly don't for you to say something that dumb.
Again: Look up Conservation of Mass or the Conservation of Energy. These are scientific laws, not opinions.
Matter always existed in some form. Your assumptions about the Big Bang being "something from nothing" are fundamentally wrong.
303d
@boonon saidhttps://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/the-conservation-of-mass-17395478/
SCIENCE is never a law. Science is always changing from the new things we learn. So if we were back in the 1700's you would 'bleed' someone to get rid of their illness, killing them from blood loss because the science of the day dictated it. My gosh yu are a nit wit.
The law of conservation of mass has been around since 1789. So much for your "always changing".
@boonon saidYou believe a talking snake brought the downfall of mankind by tricking a naked woman into a fruit. You also believe that woman populated the earth by having children who had sex with their siblings.
You actually have more faith than I do that we came from something that always existed but had no creator. That is fundamentally illogical.
Who's illogical here?
I don't care if you believe scientific explanations; just don't get them wrong like you did with your "something from nothing" tripe.
- Joined
- 30 Dec 04
- Moves
- 97400
303d
@vivify saidI believe that it took intelligent design. Something can not come from nothing. So yes I believe in God.
You believe a talking snake brought the downfall of mankind by tricking a naked woman into a fruit. You also believe that woman populated the earth by having children who had sex with their siblings.
Who's illogical here?
I don't care if you believe scientific explanations; just don't get them wrong like you did with your "something from nothing" tripe.
303d
@boonon saidIt seems you keep repeating that "something from nothing" lie regarding the Big Bang because it gives you an excuse to believe in a magical man in the sky. Since scientists don't actually claim "something from nothing" you have no ammo.
Something can not come from nothing. So yes I believe in God.
- Joined
- 30 Dec 04
- Moves
- 97400
302d
@vivify saidso please , please tell me how you or any scientist knows that ' matter always existed'.
It seems you keep repeating that "something from nothing" lie regarding the Big Bang because it gives you an excuse to believe in a magical man in the sky. Since scientists don't actually claim "something from nothing" you have no ammo.
Proof please like all other posters demand. Show me the proof that matter always existed. Not a scientific hypothesis, Proof. I don't believe the man in the sky is a man, He is more. So you keep doing you and I will keep doing me. Your unbelief does not bother me one bit, but it's funny how my belief makes you bonkers.
302d
1 edit
@boonon saidThe guy who believes a magical dude in the sky once turned a woman into a pillar of salt wants "proof".
please tell me how you or any scientist knows that ' matter always existed'.
Proof please like all other posters demand.
The guy who believes there will be a climactic battle of Armageddon between angels and demons demands scientific proof.
Scientists believe energy existed prior to the Big Bang:
https://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2022/03/033.html
So obviously scientists don't think the Big Bang didn't come from "nothing". As for as proof, there's more evidence for what scientists believe than for your nonsense.
- Joined
- 30 Dec 04
- Moves
- 97400
302d
@vivify saidScientist BELIEVE!!!! Thank you for clarifying that for me. I BELIEVE the opposite.
The guy who believes a magical dude in the sky once turned a woman into a pillar of salt wants "proof".
The guy who believes there will be a climactic battle of Armageddon between angels and demons demands scientific proof.
Scientists believe energy existed prior to the Big Bang:
https://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2022/03/033.html
So obviously scientists don't ...[text shortened]... othing". As for as proof, there's more evidence for what scientists believe than for your nonsense.
@averagejoe1 saidYou were looking less like a idiot when you passed Joe
However, VIvify treads lightly into the realm of males competing with females in a female sport???
Help me Rhonda. You libs are truly faeries. Didn't say a word when I shoved my questions day iin and day out,,....Sonhouse, who was for male in women's swim event,, would not even RESPOND when I asked what. he would do were his daughter in the competition.
Then a ...[text shortened]... e who touches on ...'well, there should be separate classes'. Do you libs see how pitiful you are?
This thread is asking if cis women who transition to male should be able to compete in male sports 🙄
There is already a thread where you can exercise your imaginary fears for your imaginary daughter
- Joined
- 30 Dec 04
- Moves
- 97400
301d
@kevcvs57 saidCis women is a made up concept. If a woman would like to compete against a man, I'd say she is nuts. Go ahead and let her play rugby or football, or soccer against a man. That by the way is why we have womens sports. For women.
You were looking less like a idiot when you passed Joe
This thread is asking if cis women who transition to male should be able to compete in male sports 🙄
There is already a thread where you can exercise your imaginary fears for your imaginary daughter
301d
@boonon saidAll words are made up constructs, gender has always been a social construct. You should focus on getting the square peg into the square hole before nurse ratchet comes around with the pill trolley.
Cis women is a made up concept. If a woman would like to compete against a man, I'd say she is nuts. Go ahead and let her play rugby or football, or soccer against a man. That by the way is why we have womens sports. For women.