@averagejoe1 saidMoney transfers don't go to a person's address; how many times has that been shown to you?
You attempt a 'Hunter segue' at my expense, when the whole issue with you and Mott is Hunter's load of cash coming to a certain address.
While I have you, can you respond to the 'nature' of the chinee millions proven to have been paid to Hunter? You can do this, a challenge to your erudite charm!
I don't care about Hunter.
28 Sep 23
@no1marauder saida really stupid dodge you are trying. no one is saying a truck load of money went to the house.
Money transfers don't go to a person's address; how many times has that been shown to you?
I don't care about Hunter.
what was the recipients address?
hunter says hey
28 Sep 23
@mott-the-hoople saidPlease explain why you think that is significant seeing how the transfer went directly to Hunter Biden's account.
a really stupid dodge you are trying. no one is saying a truck load of money went to the house.
what was the recipients address?
hunter says hey
28 Sep 23
@no1marauder saidWhat you don't 'care' about is that Joe is all wrapped up here. Did Hunter talk about 'using his dad' as vice-president....Archer said 'yes'. Look it up. Then they asked Archer 'what is the
Money transfers don't go to a person's address; how many times has that been shown to you?
I don't care about Hunter.
brand'. Archer said it is Joe Biden. Bobolinski said all the same thing. He said Joe is the 'Biden family asset'. Hunter said "my family is the only asset I got". Marauder, is joe receiving any benefit? Certainly, in principle.
28 Sep 23
@no1marauder said"seeing how the transfer went directly to Hunter Biden's account.'
Please explain why you think that is significant seeing how the transfer went directly to Hunter Biden's account.
where have you seen evidence of this?
@averagejoe1 saidArcher did not say Joe was involved in Hunter's business.
What you don't 'care' about is that Joe is all wrapped up here. Did Hunter talk about 'using his dad' as vice-president....Archer said 'yes'. Look it up. Then they asked Archer 'what is the
brand'. Archer said it is Joe Biden. Bobolinski said all the same thing. He said Joe is the 'Biden family asset'. Hunter said "my family is the only asset I got". Marauder, is joe receiving any benefit? Certainly, in principle.
Sure, Hunter used his name to impress others and open doors, but that in and of itself isn't illegal and it has nothing to do with Joe.
I'm not a "whataboutism" guy BUT:https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/09/22/ivankas-trademark-requests-were-fast-tracked-in-china-after-trump-was-elected/
28 Sep 23
@no1marauder saidopen doors for what?
Archer did not say Joe was involved in Hunter's business.
Sure, Hunter used his name to impress others and open doors, but that in and of itself isn't illegal and it has nothing to do with Joe.
just as long as that door has the big guys 10%?
28 Sep 23
@mott-the-hoople saidFunny, not a single dime has been traced to Joe from Hunter's activities.
open doors for what?
just as long as that door has the big guys 10%?
@no1marauder saidxi laying the money in joes hand is not necessary…there is reams of circumstantial evidence.
Funny, not a single dime has been traced to Joe from Hunter's activities.
the majority of Americans think he took bribes
you are in the minority
there is nothing funny at all
28 Sep 23
@no1marauder saidWell, you have been waltzing around the cash for a few months. Can you help us stipulate where the money is at this time....we already know where it came from. A foreign client has a problem.
Funny, not a single dime has been traced to Joe from Hunter's activities.
He pays a Biden. Biden leverages influence, supports favorable outcome for the client, the Biden family earns a fee. Mounting evidence, has the dinner with 4 nationals, including richest woman in Moscow, money was sent to Hunter to buy Porsche. What did she pay for? He helped Burisma join a Chinee oil company , everybody got rich.
Hunter's bank records will be subpoenaed. If we discover that Joe was taking half of Hunter's income, which thus incriminates Joe, that will do it.
Note that you never deal with these simple forum issues. You got nuthin'.
28 Sep 23
@AverageJoe1
Waching the Hearing, Marjorie Taylor Greene prsented the email where a foreigner Serbian Vuk Jeremic (Imaging that!!!) wrote Hunter ....
""Did you have a chance to talk to the Big Man? He is receiving my Prime Minister on Wednesday..please let me know if you think what we discussed back in DC can be mentioned in the meeting . My domestic strategy (how I proceed in dealing WITH MY GOVERNMENT (jesus)) very much depends on whether it happens or not,"
You have been looking for evidence? Tell us that this is not evidence of influence peddling and other violations?
28 Sep 23
@mott-the-hoople saidYou sell a conjecture laden story. But..... We just had an impeachment inquiry hearing which aired all the evidence and the republicans witness said there isn't enough evidence for impeachment.
now it comes out hunter was living at his own house in california during that time
28 Sep 23
@wildgrass saidat this point, Turley hasnt seen all the evidence yet.
You sell a conjecture laden story. But..... We just had an impeachment inquiry hearing which aired all the evidence and the republicans witness said there isn't enough evidence for impeachment.
This is not about impeaching biden. Not every republican would vote to have an inquiry . Much less a democrat controlled senate convicting.
It is a way for the American people to see what is going on with the biden brand. The majority of MSM runs cover for democrats.
A very smart play …the word will be heard now.
28 Sep 23
@mott-the-hoople saidEhh. Then the GOP should pay for it, not us taxpayers. You're kind of admitting it's a waste of tax dollars for advancing politics.
at this point, Turley hasnt seen all the evidence yet.
This is not about impeaching biden. Not every republican would vote to have an inquiry . Much less a democrat controlled senate convicting.
It is a way for the American people to see what is going on with the biden brand. The majority of MSM runs cover for democrats.
A very smart play …the word will be heard now.
Also CNN plus MSNBC is about the same viewership as foxnews. MSM is half conservative
28 Sep 23
@wildgrass saidlike the dems paid for impeaching Trump TWICE?
Ehh. Then the GOP should pay for it, not us taxpayers. You're kind of admitting it's a waste of tax dollars for advancing politics.
Also CNN plus MSNBC is about the same viewership as foxnews. MSM is half conservative
😂 oh the hypocrisy