Soon a lib will post about Menendez crime?

@mott-the-hoople said
An inquiry hasnt started.

“Turley said he did not believe the evidence so far supported bringing articles of impeachment against Biden. But Turley said the threshold had been met to launch an inquiry. To support his position, he asserted that Biden had made “demonstrably untrue” statements about business deals and had been the focus of a “multimillion-dollar” influence-peddling effort.”

evidence SO FAR

You guys want to spend HOW much on investigating the pickle in the nothingburger?

You do know that while you are fiddling, the government will shut down? Thanks for nothing, losers.

@jimmac said
you are correct in saying that not a single lib would vote for Trump but how many libs will change sides and then, vote for Trump.
Odds now are Trump $2.63 Biden $3.00 and I believe that the polls reflect this. Now 'if' the Dems are in the majority, how is this possible. My take on it all is that people are becoming less concerned about Trumps guilt and more concerned about ...[text shortened]... nasty, yet the Republicans, like them or not, are what they are, at least more so, ok much more so.

And...... we can't fix stupid. Apparently.

@suzianne said
And...... we can't fix stupid. Apparently.

This is exactly the self-righteous attitude that is causing the exodus.. Some perverted assumption that you and yours are the righteous ones, and Trump supporters are, by default, evil. It is not true, it is a lie, It is profoundly stupid and intentionally divisive, and the false love is falling apart.
BTW in the last few hrs, Trump is now @2.60, (from $2.63) Biden $3.00.
Hate, disguised as love, cannot last.

@wildgrass said
As laid out in the hearing, the investigation has been ongoing for 8 months. They subpoenaed bank records. The GOP lawyers poured through thousands of pages of documents.

This hearing was supposed to lay out evidence about the impeachable offenses. We got bubkus. I guess they can just keep on investigating the same thing, but it's honestly looking more and more like nothing.

These were GOP lawyers saying there was not evidence to impeach.

Geez. They are LOOKING for evidence, as there must be, considering the state of affairs with the Biden family.
Simply put,, even you fellers will never comment at all about the curious nature of the huge enrichment of the Biden family. Surely you have seen the news of as much as $50M income which has no basis. The SARs. The nefarious bank accounts. You are disingenuous to not exhibit a bit of curiosity.
Curious, indeed. As to the hearings, they are Trying To Find Out what this is all about, as it appears to be, uhhh a bit irregular, with smatterings of bribery, etc.
Your post here suggests that they should just stop cold? Just let it all go? I know you do not really mean that. Such a narrative is not in your marching orders. Your cohorts here would kick you off. A loyal soldier.

@suzianne said
You guys want to spend HOW much on investigating the pickle in the nothingburger?

You do know that while you are fiddling, the government will shut down? Thanks for nothing, losers.

your boo game isnt working

@mott-the-hoople said
your boo game isnt working

Suzianne may be the first person to respond to my post about the first pickle in the nothingburger....The Unanswered Question!!! Too bad it will be silly.

@wildgrass said
what's the difference between an investigation and an inquiry? One could argue that the same alleged crime of "peddling" has been under investigation since 2018. You seem to lack the self awareness to realize this starts to sound like the libs going after Trump's Russia connections, except with a lot less to go on.

Peddling? Really? We've been at this for years and we ca ...[text shortened]... f power? Not even the GOP lawyers are saying that?

Repetitive compulsion. It's a mental disorder.

Here WGrass is concerned about the difference in an investigation and an inquiry. Boy, he really has a point there. Let us discuss that.

@averagejoe1 said
Here WGrass is concerned about the difference in an investigation and an inquiry. Boy, he really has a point there. Let us discuss that.

5+ years investigatin' but you cultists are adamant that we're just getting started.

That hearing was a disaster for your narrative. Turley was a witness in the first public hearing after an 8 month 'investigation' and he says there's not evidence that qualifies for impeachment.

Can't wait for the inquiry? Is that more evidence? Burisma? Chyna? Benghazi? Whitewater? This could go on burning cash for decades.

Can you tell I can't wait? 85 more threads about hunter.

@averagejoe1 said
Geez. They are LOOKING for evidence, as there must be, considering the state of affairs with the Biden family.
Simply put,, even you fellers will never comment at all about the curious nature of the huge enrichment of the Biden family. Surely you have seen the news of as much as $50M income which has no basis. The SARs. The nefarious bank accounts. You are disi ...[text shortened]... a narrative is not in your marching orders. Your cohorts here would kick you off. A loyal soldier.

There's a bob Dylan song about this phenomenon, centered around the red scare investigations.

The John Birch Paranoid Blues

I was sitting at home and started to sweat.
The commies were in my TV set.
I peeked behind that picture frame
And a shock from feet hit my brain....
Them Reds did it.

@wildgrass said
5+ years investigatin' but you cultists are adamant that we're just getting started.

That hearing was a disaster for your narrative. Turley was a witness in the first public hearing after an 8 month 'investigation' and he says there's not evidence that qualifies for impeachment.

Can't wait for the inquiry? Is that more evidence? Burisma? Chyna? Benghazi? Whitewater? T ...[text shortened]... is could go on burning cash for decades.

Can you tell I can't wait? 85 more threads about hunter.

Hey, would you tell Marauder that inquiries are still going on, to see if there IS any evidence. No one suggests ‘pure’ evidence today, but there is evidence of evidence.
Some court cases take place, even at that late stage, based upon the appearance of evidence, he surely must know that. The finding of evidence for conviction is generally discovered by interviewing witnesses during a trial. A bloody knife itself might not be evidence. The dots must connected to get at truth and proof.
We are not there yet. I will counter here, for the record, to your ‘85 threads’ comment….Marauder has asked 86 times…Where is the evidence?? Tiresome indeed.