Debates
20 Jan 06
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemBOO HOO!!! If you people get your way, the forum will be moderated into oblivion. Let the Brothaz talk and give up this ridiculous posturing like this forum is a cultured island of reasoned discourse. You can't "pollute" this forum because it's filled to the absolute brim with crap. If you don't want to deal with crap, read Puzzles.
Why is it a big deal? Because I f'in hate spam. And it ain't just his threads that he pollutes. He fills other people's threads with his same crap, too.
Edit: I really don't expect you to understand, since you don't support the concept of moderation in general.
Originally posted by sasquatch672Unlike you, I don't try to tell other people what they can post. If I don't like what's being said in a thread, I don't post there. Maybe you should try the same instead of being so in favor of censoring certain individuals you happen not to like. Jerk.
Then maybe you should find another site that's worthy of your intellect.
Originally posted by no1marauderThe difference is that they at least try to engage in debate. Unsuccessfully, perhaps; but at least they try.
You're joking I hope; do you read the posts of slimjim??? Or cankersoremechanic??? Or FreakyKBH????? There isn't a bit of content in their and many others' posts in this forum. Get off your ridiculous high horse; this is a DEBATES FORUM ON AN INTERNET CHESS SITE!!! "The forums would be devalued" LMFAO!!!!!! How can trying to bring debate on American fore ...[text shortened]... bate about important topics. You people make me sick with this sanctiminous crap.
It is STANG who needs to realise this is a debates forum on an internet chess site. Repeatedly posting the same thing with NO REGARD for what anyone else has posted is beyond ignorance. It is contempt.
As I said, the content of his views is irrelevant. I will take being called an "anti-American polesmoker"; I will put up with the sanctimony, the false information, the false righteousness, the bigotry, as long as there is a mutual understanding that there are SOME rules and as long as there is SOME attempt to engage.
Originally posted by sasquatch672I put more actual content in any one of thousands of my posts than you and your retarded friends have done in all your posts combined. No, I won't put up with the crap you guys dish out and I give it back better than you morons can. Tough titty. Go back and find that post and go find the BS he was dishing out while I was trying to discuss the war. You pieces of trash like to start the crap and then cry if someone hands it back. Sorry, BullyBoy, I don't take it from anyone. If someone wants to have a reasoned debate, I do it; if someone wants to insult, I can do that too. But I don't try to censor other people; I leave that to arrogant, hypocritical jerks like you.
If you don't like what's being said in a thread you don't post there. Yeah. That's why your flame wars with people here number in the hundreds. You're known here for vicious insults of people you disagree with. Do I need to go back and find the post where you said that SlimJim would have to take sloppy seconds with his daughters the night Saddam Hus I'll help you out - you're as guilty as anybody here for the "crap" on this site.
Originally posted by dottewellhttp://www.timeforchess.com/board/search.php?threadid=0&authorname=STANG&dayfrom=1&monthfrom=2&yearfrom=2001&dayto=0&monthto=0&yearto=0&page=1
The difference is that they at least try to engage in debate. Unsuccessfully, perhaps; but at least they try.
It is STANG who needs to realise this is a debates forum on an internet chess site. Repeatedly posting the same thing with NO REGARD for what anyone else has posted is beyond ignorance. It is contempt.
As I said, the content of his vie mutual understanding that there are SOME rules and as long as there is SOME attempt to engage.
Looking at his posts over the last week, there's a certain amount of duplication but he normally addresses the post he is Reply and Quoting. If you check page 3, you'll see our resident protector of the integrity of the Debate forum calling STANG "a closet homosexual" who "has sex with farm animals". That doesn't seem terribly on-topic, does it??
EDIT: It cut my link off; just "search forums" for STANG.
Originally posted by no1marauderI know; he is obviously intelligent. That's what makes it worse that he can't observe the rules. He has been asked, warned and then banned more than once. He knows the score. Yet he continually pushes his luck.
http://www.timeforchess.com/board/search.php?threadid=0&authorname=STANG&dayfrom=1&monthfrom=2&yearfrom=2001&dayto=0&monthto=0&yearto=0&page=1
Looking at his posts over the last week, there's a certain amount of duplication but he normally addresses the post he is Reply and Quoting. If you check page 3, you'll see our resident protector of the in ...[text shortened]... rribly on-topic, does it??
EDIT: It cut my link off; just "search forums" for STANG.
I would much rather he simply contributed normally; then when he did have one of his "aberations", no one would mind.
His martyr complex is going to be the death of him. Then everyone will be happy.
Originally posted by no1marauderI mostly agree with Stang's motives. I used to completely disagree with his actions on here. I used to think that his points of views were too simplistic and repetitive to be of any worth. They were too easily dismissed.
http://www.timeforchess.com/board/search.php?threadid=0&authorname=STANG&dayfrom=1&monthfrom=2&yearfrom=2001&dayto=0&monthto=0&yearto=0&page=1
Looking at his posts over the last week, there's a certain amount of duplication but he normally addresses the post he is Reply and Quoting. If you check page 3, you'll see our resident protector of the in ...[text shortened]... rribly on-topic, does it??
EDIT: It cut my link off; just "search forums" for STANG.
BUT, having followed 2Bit's links, I can see that he does address other people's points in his posts, and isn't just a spam merchant.
Its very easy to dismiss something you don't like as a mere annoyance. Much easier than examining if you can turn that annoyance into something self-improving.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakIt is right to say he isn't just a spam merchant. But he is a spam merchant.
I mostly agree with Stang's motives. I used to completely disagree with his actions on here. I used to think that his points of views were too simplistic and repetitive to be of any worth. They were too easily dismissed.
BUT, having followed 2Bit's links, I can see that he does address other people's points in his posts, and isn't just a spam merchant ...[text shortened]... ch easier than examining if you can turn that annoyance into something self-improving.
D
That has got him banned before and will apparently get him banned again. It will be his own fault.
(I presume his deleted spam messages don't show up if you search through his previous posts.)
Originally posted by dottewellWhat a very convenient presumption on your part!!!!
It is right to say he isn't just a spam merchant. But he is a spam merchant.
That has got him banned before and will apparently get him banned again. It will be his own fault.
(I presume his deleted spam messages don't show up if you search through his previous posts.)
Originally posted by no1marauderEven if they don't, the posts that are there are the usual STANG mixture of good points and spam.
What a very convenient presumption on your part!!!!
It's the spam that will get him banned again.
But don't mourn him. I'm sure he will find a backgammon site, or perhaps an online poker site, and continue to fight the good fight.
[EDIT: Incidentally, I would have handed out temporary bans and warnings to a number of people posting homophobic remarks in the general forum today.
Goodnight.]
Originally posted by no1marauderYou are a goddamn liar. I never insulted your family when you insulted my daughters. You've made snide remarks like I molest my children and grandchildren. You find a post where I've said the same thing about the grandson you rightfully dote upon. I'll be in Philly when they have the meet and I want you to tell me to my face that my daughters are whores if you have the balls to do it. I just wonder if you have the balls to not sue after I stomp a mudhole in your ass and walk it dry. Censor this post now you prick.
I put more actual content in any one of thousands of my posts than you and your retarded friends have done in all your posts combined. No, I won't put up with the crap you guys dish out and I give it back better than you morons can. Tough titty. Go back and find that post and go find the BS he was dishing out while I was trying to discuss the war. You pi ut I don't try to censor other people; I leave that to arrogant, hypocritical jerks like you.
Originally posted by slimjimGee, you're sooooooooooooooooo sensitive, honey.
You are a goddamn liar. I never insulted your family when you insulted my daughters. You've made snide remarks like I molest my children and grandchildren. You find a post where I've said the same thing about the grandson you rightfully dote upon. I'll be in Philly when they have the meet and I want you to tell me to my face that my daughters are whores if y ...[text shortened]... not sue after I stomp a mudhole in your ass and walk it dry. Censor this post now you prick.