@Rajk999 - said
- there are no UN resolutions which Israel needs to abide by
- there is no international law which says Israel cannot annex terrorory.
Shear ignorance.
UN Resolution 242: November 22, 1967, the unanimously adopted resolution called on Israel to withdraw its armed forces from territories occupied in the 1967 conflict.
The UN never backed up that resolution like they did with Iraq's incursion into Kuwait.
The result was the Yom Kippur War of 1973, so the UN reiterated the demand that Israel get out
of the occupied lands of 1967 with UN resolution 338.
And the UN Law says very clearly, it is ILLEGAL to seize territory in an act of war, even if the war is defensive.
Also, the UN has order Israel to allow the exiled Palestinians the "Right of Return" that the Israelis refuse to allow for.
Your shallow knowledge on the matter is quite biased.
11 Jun 21
@Rajk999 - said
Who fired the first bomb started it. Its common sense. Its called first blood.
The first drawing of blood was done by the immigrant Jews to innocent Palestinians a century ago.
11 Jun 21
@earl-of-trumps saidWell they have to abide by the UN partition plan of 1947 as well.
@Rajk999 - said
- there are no UN resolutions which Israel needs to abide by
- there is no international law which says Israel cannot annex terrorory.
Shear ignorance.
UN Resolution 242: November 22, 1967, the unanimously adopted resolution called on Israel to withdraw its armed forces from territories occupied in the 1967 conflict.
...[text shortened]... [/b]that the Israelis refuse to allow for.
Your shallow knowledge on the matter is quite biased.
Why did they not obey that?
11 Jun 21
1 edit
@rajk999 saidThe Partition was non binding. This has been pointed out to you before. It was not a LAW to force the issue, to wit:
Well they have to abide by the UN partition plan of 1947 as well.
Why did they not obey that?
The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II). The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem.
Note: my highlighting the key words. It was not fiat or law. The Palestinians did not go along with the recommendation.
The Israelis stole all the land. Try to keep up. We keep pointing this out to you.
11 Jun 21
@earl-of-trumps saidRight so the whole drama started without law or order in 1948. The british and the UN tried to make peace but both parties wanted war. That area is lawless since that time. All of sudden you cannot now come and expect Israel to abide by any UN resolutions when nobody in that region does it. Its a war for the whole land of Palestine. Nobody wants a peaceful partition.
The Partition was non binding. This has been pointed out to you before. It was not a LAW to force the issue, to wit:
[quote]
The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted th ...[text shortened]... recommendation.
The Israelis stole all the land. Try to keep up. We keep pointing this out to you.
12 Jun 21
@rajk999 saidThat's a fair summary. Lawlessness. The UN has no ballz
Right so the whole drama started without law or order in 1948. The british and the UN tried to make peace but both parties wanted war. That area is lawless since that time. All of sudden you cannot now come and expect Israel to abide by any UN resolutions when nobody in that region does it. Its a war for the whole land of Palestine. Nobody wants a peaceful partition.