15 Dec 20
@metal-brain saidI'd expect that if a Democrat had sufficient evidence that an election was "stolen" from them, they'd be able to present it in Court.
"This country isn't North Korea and grownups don't make such absurd claims just because their favored candidates lose elections."
So grownups don't live in North Korea? Trump is not my favored candidate and you know it. I didn't vote for him and he got what he deserved since he attempted to overthrow a democracy in Venezuela. Remember when I called for his impeachment? ...[text shortened]... olen from a democrat and the SCOTUS refuses to accept the case? Have you thought that far ahead yet?
I'm not sure where you stand on Venezuela; you now seem to have adopted Sidney Powell's allegations regarding the Dominion voting machines. You know, that they were rigged up to change votes for Chavez and now are doing the same thing for Biden.
@no1marauder saidHe said governor. I was assuming he meant that Abbott was going to be prosecuted for something.
You really haven't been keeping up: https://www.courthousenews.com/fbi-subpoenas-texas-ag-ken-paxton-after-alleged-bribery-reports/
15 Dec 20
1 edit
@no1marauder said"I'm not sure where you stand on Venezuela; you now seem to have adopted Sidney Powell's allegations regarding the Dominion voting machines. You know, that they were rigged up to change votes for Chavez and now are doing the same thing for Biden."
I'd expect that if a Democrat had sufficient evidence that an election was "stolen" from them, they'd be able to present it in Court.
I'm not sure where you stand on Venezuela; you now seem to have adopted Sidney Powell's allegations regarding the Dominion voting machines. You know, that they were rigged up to change votes for Chavez and now are doing the same thing for Biden.
You know fully well I don't believe that. You are clearly using a digression tactic to evade something. What do you fear acknowledging this time?
edit:
This is about democracy, not partisan bias. What happens when an election is stolen from a democrat, the courts say there is not sufficient evidence even though there is probable cause and the SCOTUS refuses to accept the case? And last but not least......it is Trump!
Have you thought that far ahead yet?
15 Dec 20
@sh76 saidIt doesn't matter if you voted for Biden. Did you?
FYI (not that is matters), but I de-regsitered as a Dem after the primary. I'm now an Independent and a former Republican and former Democrat (as I'm proud to announce on my Twitter handle. If the GOP even goes back to being the party of McCain and Romney, I'll register as a Republican. In the meantime, I'm an independent who will register in whatever primary is more interesting as each election approaches.
I voted for Howie Hawkins.
15 Dec 20
1 edit
@metal-brain saidTHERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OFFERED! It was a challenge based on procedural changes to the election process way before the election and one state cannot impose electoral procedure on another state. There was nothing to be heard. The two justices who stated that they would have heard the case for purely procedural reasons also made it clear that they could see no merit in the content of the case.
How do you know? You haven't heard heard all of the evidence.
Are you a mind reader?
The allegation is that states violated their own election laws in violation of the constitution. If you can list all of the allegations in a document go for it, but you are omitting important facts that make it apparent you are less than informed.
15 Dec 20
@metal-brain saidThe election wasn’t stolen though was it!
"I'm not sure where you stand on Venezuela; you now seem to have adopted Sidney Powell's allegations regarding the Dominion voting machines. You know, that they were rigged up to change votes for Chavez and now are doing the same thing for Biden."
You know fully well I don't believe that. You are clearly using a digression tactic to evade something. What do you fear ac ...[text shortened]... to accept the case? And last but not least......it is Trump!
Have you thought that far ahead yet?
If there is actual evidence of electoral fraud on a scale that could effect the result ten presumably the courts will see that evidence and act upon it regardless of which party has harmed. It’s the basic tenets of democracy that needs be to preserved not the Dems or the Reps.
15 Dec 20
@kevcvs57 said"The two justices who stated that they would have heard the case for purely procedural reasons also made it clear there was no merit in the content of the case."
THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OFFERED! It was a challenge based on procedural changes to the election process way before the election and one state cannot impose electoral procedure on another state. There was nothing to be heard. The two justices who stated that they would have heard the case for purely procedural reasons also made it clear there was no merit in the content of the case.
What is your source of information?
15 Dec 20
@kevcvs57 saidThe case wasn’t rejected on the merits the case. It was rejected on standing.
The election wasn’t stolen though was it!
If there is actual evidence of electoral fraud on a scale that could effect the result ten presumably the courts will see that evidence and act upon it regardless of which party has harmed. It’s the basic tenets of democracy that needs be to preserved not the Dems or the Reps.
If you don't know what that means have someone explain it to you.
15 Dec 20
1 edit
This SCOTUS case being rejected will horrify historians, not because it was rejected on standing, but because time limitations made this the only possible way to be heard and they knew it.
If there was any other practical way for the SCOTUS to hear the case I think I would have heard about it by now. Democrats are fine with it now, but they will surely regret it some day and I think they know it and simply fooling themselves into thinking democracy itself is not threatened by this and it is.
Next time a candidate contests the election and it is a democrat that can't get a SCOTUS case heard crap will hit the fan. Then it will be the republicans that condone a corrupt SCOTUS and tell the dems to get over it. There will be mass hypocrisy on both sides. Maybe even an insurrection could result.
Historians will be horrified and ask "what the heck were they thinking? They condoned that crap?"
15 Dec 20
@metal-brain saidThe statement of the court read out live on the news with the actual text in camera view.
"The two justices who stated that they would have heard the case for purely procedural reasons also made it clear there was no merit in the content of the case."
What is your source of information?
what’s yours? conspiracybs.com
15 Dec 20
@kevcvs57 saidDo you have a video of it? A link covering what was said?
The statement of the court read out live on the news with the actual text in camera view.
what’s yours? conspiracybs.com
Anything you can post on here?
15 Dec 20
@metal-brain saidI watched it live on CNN they’ve still got the judgement text in full on their website and it doesn’t demand an email address.
Do you have a video of it? A link covering what was said?
Anything you can post on here?
So you’ve done all this chundering based on what? Just your hurt feelings?
15 Dec 20
1 edit
@kevcvs57 saidHere is a statement from Guiliani:
The election wasn’t stolen though was it!
If there is actual evidence of electoral fraud on a scale that could effect the result ten presumably the courts will see that evidence and act upon it regardless of which party has harmed. It’s the basic tenets of democracy that needs be to preserved not the Dems or the Reps.
“This is outrageous what they’re doing. The American people should have the benefit of hearing these facts…The facts have been kept from them.”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/trump-still-contesting-stolen-election-2020/5732292
This statement contradicts yours as well as many other statements he has made. As far as I am aware, the SCOTUS never considered any evidence as you claimed. Until you can prove otherwise I will assume you made a false assertion.
15 Dec 20
@metal-brain saidI supported Biden, but because of Biden and Trump, not because of the Democratic party, with whom I am thoroughly disenchanted.
It doesn't matter if you voted for Biden. Did you?
I voted for Howie Hawkins.
15 Dec 20
1 edit
@sh76 saidGovernor or whatever the high ranked Republican who was trying to steal an election in exchange for a pardon. So he was the attorney general, somebody who you’d think would know a little bit about the constitution and how the SCOTUS works.
He said governor. I was assuming he meant that Abbott was going to be prosecuted for something.