10 Mar 21
@moonbus saidMoonman,,, I good reason to cut and paste some of the pertinent text from any link is, people use their free reads, I have done here with forbes so I can't read any of it. This is an aggravating trend in marketing.
Forbes reports a summary of the Sussexes' network worth (estimated):
https://www.forbes.com/sites/dawnchmielewski/2021/02/26/how-much-are-prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-worth-surprisingly-not-that-much/
10 Mar 21
1 edit
@earl-of-trumps saidWhat, are you not on Forbes' 500 list?? Hey, get with it, Earl.
Moonman,,, I good reason to cut and paste some of the pertinent text from any link is, people use their free reads, I have done here with forbes so I can't read any of it. This is an aggravating trend in marketing.
Oops, I may have just blown my cover.
</sarcasm>
According to Forbes, Harry inherited about 10 mill from Dianna. The Sussexes' Frogmore cottage [sic] just got renovated for a cool 3 mill loan, which Harry paid back. Since they won't be living there, they bought a $14.7 mill estate in Montecito, near the seaside in Santa Barbara, California. They put down 5 mill capital, and have a 10 mill mortgage to pay off. Meghan earns royalties from Suits but not enough to cover expenses (security is a biggie for royals -- Lord Mountbatten was blown up on his yacht, and royals never forget when a royal is assassinated). So, compared to the rest of the Windsors, Harry and Meghan are not rolling in dough. The Queen has a net worth of $500 million, according to the last tally by Forbes in 2019, while the combined value of the British Monarch’s holdings with the Crown Estate, the Duchy of Lancaster (a real estate trust), were worth a whopping $25 billion.
11 Mar 21
The post that was quoted here has been removedThing is, whatever happened to 'innocent until proven guilty'? The interview has in any event been proved to be beset with that which might generously be called 'inaccuracies' on several counts. The accusations of racism are unproven, so they should neither be be believed or disbelieved, and the fuss which is currently being made about them is completely unjustified.
11 Mar 21
@indonesia-phil saidIts ironic your comment given that more people would apply that innocence to the Duke and Duchess and not the centuries old institution we all hold dear and love :- the Monarchy.
Thing is, whatever happened to 'innocent until proven guilty'? The interview has in any event been proved to be beset with that which might generously be called 'inaccuracies' on several counts. The accusations of racism are unproven, so they should neither be be believed or disbelieved, and the fuss which is currently being made about them is completely unjustified.
@Duchess64
"Denying or minimizing racism in the UK seems to be one issue that unites almost all white Brits." - Duche.
As you don't reside in the U.K. (or do you🤔) you have a total grasp of a WOKE blinkered opinion, wouldn't be so piss poor if you knew an 'ordinary' person couldn't give a monkey about Rainbow rich anarchists who read a Guardian. Or who wish the celeb.
Don't tar us all with the same brush Duchess - It's about time you gave up with cut/paste instead of constantly winding people up.
You can't escape the fact he is ruled by her (PTSD might be get out clause to go snivelling back to the Windsor's) but she will get sweet F.A. and ultimately winding up the British public and press will end in only one way. Indeed when it does you'll knock out more leftie woke nonsense. Happy day's, keep digging🤣👍🚬
The post that was quoted here has been removedI wasn't talking legally. Nor was I saying anything should be ignored, or not taken seriously. Nor am I denying or minimising racism in the UK or anywhere else. What I am saying is that it's too early for anybody (and please don't take this personally, I'm not referring to your good self) to accuse anybody or even speculate as to whether racist remarks were made until this is established beyond doubt one way or the other. If enough mud, accusations and insults are thrown around some of it/them tend(s) to stick. This works both ways, and there are plenty of sticks to get the wrong end of in this matter. I prefer to stick to the facts, which aren't known yet.
11 Mar 21
The post that was quoted here has been removedIf Someone stands up and says I suffered racism, but doesn’t say by whom and there’s no reproach possible, why the hell should it be believed?
Someone wondered about the colour of the baby? Until two days ago I didn’t even know the woman was bloody black.
Perhaps it was a joke. God only knows.
However, this anti-woke BS is getting on my tits as well. This constant right-wing victimhood that they’re being cancelled.
They’re not being cancelled. It’s just that people don’t like listening to neo-fascist extremists constantly whining about how bad they have it.
To sum it all up: royal family, right-wingers, woke people, anti-woke people, they all get on my tits.