Go back
The wrong assumption of chess as an intellectual sport

The wrong assumption of chess as an intellectual sport

Debates

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147613
Clock
20d

@sonhouse said
@Mott-The-Hoople
Sure hit me.
for the record I did challenge shathouse to a rematch, he refused

Mott=1

shathouse= 0

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8706
Clock
20d

@Mott-The-Hoople said
for the record I did challenge shathouse to a rematch, he refused

Mott=1

shathouse= 0
Most kids grow out of name calling by the 5th grade. Some go on to be elected president though. Wonder who voted for him?

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121026
Clock
20d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Lionel-Hutz said
A reputable statistics and sociology journal is about to publish one of my papers analyzing the correlations between level/intensity of chess playing and a myriad of political attitudes with lifestyle choices and intersections with family life.

It's a very serious paper but I would summarize it as follows: The conclusion is that progressives are emotionally and intelle ...[text shortened]... d are chronically unhappy.

Of course, the above insight is not included in the paper.

Science.
The Beano online?

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121026
Clock
20d

@Lionel-Hutz said
Some responses kind of proof my (private) point
I hope you had your paper prove read.

Lionel Hutz
It's me: Seitse

Buenos Aires

Joined
27 Sep 20
Moves
734
Clock
18d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester said
I hope you had your paper prove read.
I meant probe. Like in aliens using their long fingers.

Lionel Hutz
It's me: Seitse

Buenos Aires

Joined
27 Sep 20
Moves
734
Clock
18d

@divegeester said
The Beano online?
Critical Studies in Queer Latinx Socialist Midgetry.

Free Plasticine!

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
670741
Clock
18d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Lionel-Hutz said
Some responses kind of proof my (private) point 🙂

Anyway, here it is, explained with play-doh figurines: Paper A crunches numbers, Opinion B consists of personal thoughts. Paper A will appear in Journal C. Opinion B is not included in Paper A but, instead, shared anonymously on Platform D just for the lulz.

Next round I can use crayons if play-doh was too complex.
...and I will wait for the link and read the paper.

Lionel Hutz
It's me: Seitse

Buenos Aires

Joined
27 Sep 20
Moves
734
Clock
18d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Ponderable said
...and I will wait for the link and read the paper.
Almost done. They are demanding proofs before publishing.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
10d

@Mott-The-Hoople said
for the record I did challenge shathouse to a rematch, he refused

Mott=1

shathouse= 0
You got that right, I refused because you set up a one day time out when I am in the middle of a move, I would never play a one day timeout.
That just shows how desperate you are to win.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37317
Clock
10d

@Lionel-Hutz said
A reputable statistics and sociology journal is about to publish one of my papers analyzing the correlations between level/intensity of chess playing and a myriad of political attitudes with lifestyle choices and intersections with family life.

It's a very serious paper but I would summarize it as follows: The conclusion is that progressives are emotionally and intelle ...[text shortened]... d are chronically unhappy.

Of course, the above insight is not included in the paper.

Science.
Are you sure? You don’t sound like a liberal, you sound like a complete imbecile aka right winger

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.