This Debate Site

@kingdavid403 said
So your reality is termination up until birth.
For medical reasons, yes.
Would you think this woman would be in her right mind, regardless of legal or not?
The reality is: no women or woman is doing that. If you can point to one instance of this happening please share. Until then, this is a fallacy. And, it is illegal in the USA in all states.

@mike69 said
7 months then, did I miss understand it being a delicate PERSONAL matter up to the mother.

@kingdavid403 said
7 months is still illegal; if it's viable. I think the legal limit is five or six months. Nothing past the second trimester, if it's viable.

@mike69 said
So your good at 7 but not 9 why by your standards?

@kingdavid403 said
Because it will become a live viable person when it's born after this point (most likely); or, if it was born at that moment(most likely).
So your good at 7 but not 9
I never said this; you did. Don't put words into my mouth. That's to 'smaller than average joe' for me.

@mike69 said
Reading back until now it sounds like you’re dodging, adding in rules to your beliefs now. Also you don’t know that it would be case by case.

@kingdavid403 said
Reading back until now it sounds like you’re dodging, adding in rules to your beliefs now.
You just can't comprehend. Maybe it's your far-right Trumptarded dyslexia. 🙂

@mike69 said
Do you have children?

@averagejoe1 said
Mike, are you still communicating with this pitiful lunatic? And all these other libs are associating with him, like it is normal. Like they are all normal. They kill babies BTW. You gonna have them over for the evening with your family and kids?

@mike69 said
I guess you’re sound and right as usual, may you be blessed with many green thumbs!

Are you now limiting that delicate personal choice?

@AverageJoe1
I don't think you understand the implications of the Moore case. It won't be repubs in power, it will LITERALLY be the end of democracy in the US and ANY other party besides repubs will be irrelevant because there will ALWAYS be a repub win.
I guess that suits you just fine, you hate democracy anyway. Why don't you just admit it so we can get on with the "discussion''?

Just mewling out repubs and Dems, you called them Dams which I guess you thought was funny, all want power but it is repubs rejecting bills forcing them to reveal sources of income like the 1 BILLION dollars given to them recently.
Corporations don't want the end of fossil fuels so they are running the country into the ground and they WANT an end to democracy here.
Can you at last just admit you hate democracy too?

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/moore-v-harper-explained

THIS is the Moore case which is the biggest immediate threat to democracy in the 200+ year history of the US.

@sonhouse said - it will LITERALLY be the end of democracy in the US and ANY other party besides repubs will be irrelevant because there will ALWAYS be a repub win.
-------------------------------

You, sir, are as soft as a flocking grape.

@averagejoe1 said
Mike, are you still communicating with this pitiful lunatic? And all these other libs are associating with him, like it is normal. Like they are all normal. They kill babies BTW. You gonna have them over for the evening with your family and kids?

@kingdavid403 said
You gonna have them over for the evening with your family and kids?
You would not need to worry about your family or kids; just your worthless loser liar self.

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
I don't think you understand the implications of the Moore case. It won't be repubs in power, it will LITERALLY be the end of democracy in the US and ANY other party besides repubs will be irrelevant because there will ALWAYS be a repub win.
I guess that suits you just fine, you hate democracy anyway. Why don't you just admit it so we can get on with the "disc ...[text shortened]... he Moore case which is the biggest immediate threat to democracy in the 200+ year history of the US.