"This wave of anti-China feeling masks the west's own Covid-19 failures"

The post that was quoted here has been removed

During your jingoistic rant you missed ignored the most salient part of my post: that the amount if aid given doesn't excuse a country's human rights abuses. We can go duel links arguing over who gives more, but unlike you I don't agree foreign aid is a defense for human rights violations, which is how you make excuses for China.

@lemondrop said
that's rich from one whose self proclaimed title is 'drown all midgets'
I know you think that it's cute and funny but it's not

Only midgets think it isn't funny or cute.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Wrong.

Duchess made a thread about MLK supposedly being recorded supporting rape, and wrongly accused me of accepting it when my posts clearly attacked that accusation of MLK. Instead of admitting her error Duchess sheepishly moved on to attacking me for "not accepting evidence".

Duchess shows her same lack of reading comprehension regarding the post she referenced. Her assertion is equally false.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Another false assertion.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

These are 2 points' from your reply to my post, in which I pulled up your poor use of English, when you said Chinese people were concerned about human rights in China.

The first paragraph is totally off topic, either of the thread (YOUR thread), or my post. Against posting guidelines. I will not report it this time.

The 2nd paragraph seems to contradict your hypothesis that 'Chinese people are concerned about human rights in China. They are (understandably) living their own lives, so 'most' are not concerned. Well, are they, or aren't they?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

If that is what you meant in the now quoted post, then you have expressed it ambiguously.

It can either mean a) only Chinese people have the right (ironically) to have a say in human rights in China.

Or b) Chinese people have a concern for human rights in China

If it is a), then the addition of the word 'only' at the end of the sentence, after 'people' , would have made it clear.

As it was presented, it is open to ambiguous interpretation, and so is not fit for purpose in a debates forum.