- Joined
- 11 Nov 14
- Moves
- 38428
1 edit
@Duchess64
I see your little spell in the 'cooler' hasn't altered your highly flawed debating style.
We have now entered into arm flapping, teacher trying to control a class that they find difficult, mode.
Hmmm
Will catch up with you again soon.
See you choose (wisely) not to challenge my assertion that your original statement was, at best, ambiguous.
- Joined
- 11 Nov 14
- Moves
- 38428
1 edit
The post that was quoted here has been removedTalking of conceding errors, do you concede that your statement that all of this is about is ambiguous, or are you claiming that it has a unique interpretation?
To remind you 'Human rights in China is a concern for Chinese people'
Try to avoid arm flapping.
Just a 'ok, it is ambiguous' or 'no, it can only be interpreted in one way' will be fine.
Thanks
The post that was quoted here has been removedPerhaps you are ignorant of the fact that some Westerners (I won’t go anywhere near your sweeping generalizations) critisize foreign regimes to point things out, rather than change them.
That is, indeed, for the Chinese people to do.
As for China becoming an economic powerhouse bully... I couldn’t care less. It’s pretty much: meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
As for comparing the average modern Western man with colonial rulers... that is so far out of any ballpark, I don’t even know how to respond without insulting you.
