trump admits to election meddling…

@moonbus said
By causing sealed voting machines to be seized and breached; by engaging false electors to submit bogus results; …

The alternate electors stated that the votes would only change if the results changed. Some did not, but you have to prove they didn't act on their own and I have not seen any such proof.

"By causing sealed voting machines to be seized and breached"

What is your source of information? Who seized and breached them? Trump himself? If not you have the same problem. Did they act on their own?

@metal-brain said
The alternate electors stated that the votes would only change if the results changed. Some did not, but you have to prove they didn't act on their own and I have not seen any such proof.

"By causing sealed voting machines to be seized and breached"

What is your source of information? Who seized and breached them? Trump himself? If not you have the same problem. Did they act on their own?

The alternate electors…

Uhuh

@shavixmir said
The alternate electors…

Uhuh

Where is the evidence Trump forced them to do what they did? I have not seen any proof. Have you?

My guess is that it is all about what Trump said. Not actions, but words some perceived as influencing people to do things. So the Trump haters will say his words are actions. He told so and so to do this or that. Never mind that these alternative electors had a choice to not follow through with it. Trump must have hypnotized them so they didn't know what they were doing.

Have faith that words are actions. Hey shav, go jump off of a bridge. My bad, those words are actions. You might jump off of a bridge. Do it. Just do it. You have no choice. I told you to.

@metal-brain said
Where is the evidence Trump forced them to do what they did? I have not seen any proof. Have you?

My guess is that it is all about what Trump said. Not actions, but words some perceived as influencing people to do things. So the Trump haters will say his words are actions. He told so and so to do this or that. Never mind that these alternative electors had a choice to ...[text shortened]... s are actions. You might jump off of a bridge. Do it. Just do it. You have no choice. I told you to.

You do realise there’s a difference between you saying something and the commander in chief of a country saying something?

@jj-adams said
No he said he had the right to speak out about the election being fraudulent.
What is an election medal?

Well he hasn’t been indicted for speaking out no matter how many times you claim that he has so that’s fine then, you can sleep easy tonight

@metal-brain said
Where is the evidence Trump forced them to do what they did? I have not seen any proof. Have you?

My guess is that it is all about what Trump said. Not actions, but words some perceived as influencing people to do things. So the Trump haters will say his words are actions. He told so and so to do this or that. Never mind that these alternative electors had a choice to ...[text shortened]... s are actions. You might jump off of a bridge. Do it. Just do it. You have no choice. I told you to.

When a head of state exclaims “who will rid me of this turbulent priest!” it is not a rhetorical question; it’s a command.

@shavixmir said
You do realise there’s a difference between you saying something and the commander in chief of a country saying something?

why dont you enlighten us? explain the difference

@metal-brain said
The alternate electors stated that the votes would only change if the results changed. Some did not, but you have to prove they didn't act on their own and I have not seen any such proof.

"By causing sealed voting machines to be seized and breached"

What is your source of information? Who seized and breached them? Trump himself? If not you have the same problem. Did they act on their own?

The plan with the alternate electors was not to change the votes. The states had already decided. Trump wanted to create the illusion of dispute, so that those states could be excluded from voting for Biden. The official certification of election results would simply not include the vote outcome from those states. The protestors were there to disrupt congress, create chaos, again because they wanted the illusion that there was something legitimate still being disputed. From the point that each state had finished certifying the election results, the disputes were an illegal conspiracy.

All this is outlined in great detail in the indictments. There is a paper trail and witness testimony to support this.

@metal-brain said
Where is the evidence Trump forced them to do what they did? I have not seen any proof. Have you?

My guess is that it is all about what Trump said. Not actions, but words some perceived as influencing people to do things. So the Trump haters will say his words are actions. He told so and so to do this or that. Never mind that these alternative electors had a choice to ...[text shortened]... s are actions. You might jump off of a bridge. Do it. Just do it. You have no choice. I told you to.

There are legal penalties for being an accessory to a crime.

@wildgrass said
The plan with the alternate electors was not to change the votes. The states had already decided. Trump wanted to create the illusion of dispute, so that those states could be excluded from voting for Biden. The official certification of election results would simply not include the vote outcome from those states. The protestors were there to disrupt congress, create chaos, ...[text shortened]... ed in great detail in the indictments. There is a paper trail and witness testimony to support this.

😂 you pitiful fools

@mott-the-hoople said
😂 you pitiful fools

Mr. T?

Sober up.

@wildgrass said
Mr. T?

Sober up.

cant help but laugh at you…sad part is, you are taking me down with you.

@mott-the-hoople said
cant help but laugh at you…sad part is, you are taking me down with you.

you take down yourself with incoherent posts.

@wildgrass said
you take down yourself with incoherent posts.

keep trying, you are still saying stupid shyt!