- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121001
45d
@cliff-mashburn removed their quoted postThat’ll be a “whoosh” you can hear.
Can you not see the satire in my OP?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121001
@cliff-mashburn removed their quoted postYou don’t see the satire in my use of the accusations against Trump of being a misogynist and of him being a bit thick, contrasted with him immediately appointing two strong women to top jobs? Come on!
Ok let me help you …. if Trump is a misogynist then why has he appointed these women?
45d
@cliff-mashburn removed their quoted postI was about to scold him (@divegester) for the obvious heavy handed joke, then you come and take it for serious....
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121001
45d
@Ponderable saidScold me? Heavy handed joke?
I was about to scold him (@divegester) for the obvious heavy handed joke, then you come and take it for serious....
45d
@divegeester saidMaybe I picked the wrong word with "scold"
Scold me? Heavy handed joke?
But the joke that it would be proof that Trump was no misogynist because he named already two women is heavy handed.
You know that we (apart from Cliff Mashburn evidently) know that it would take much more to proof his neutrality in this sector.
45d
@Ponderable saidIf being neutral means that he picks an equal amount of both sexes then Trump is a damn fool. Good leaders place people according to their ability to perform the job assigned. There are some jobs women do better than men and some where men are needed. The sexes are not the same neither are they equal regardless of how badly people want them to be.
Maybe I picked the wrong word with "scold"
But the joke that it would be proof that Trump was no misogynist because he named already two women is heavy handed.
You know that we (apart from Cliff Mashburn evidently) know that it would take much more to proof his neutrality in this sector.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121001
45d
@Ponderable saidThat’s a bit of a strawman considering you haven’t provided any proof yourself that he is a misogynist.
Maybe I picked the wrong word with "scold"
But the joke that it would be proof that Trump was no misogynist because he named already two women is heavy handed.
You know that we (apart from Cliff Mashburn evidently) know that it would take much more to proof his neutrality in this sector.
45d
@divegeester saidYouall embarrassed the guy and he deleted the post.
You don’t see the satire in my use of the accusations against Trump of being a misogynist and of him being a bit thick, contrasted with him immediately appointing two strong women to top jobs? Come on!
Ok let me help you …. if Trump is a misogynist then why has he appointed these women?
45d
@Rajk999 saidPicking people because of their merits (not including biology) is a sign of neutrality.
If being neutral means that he picks an equal amount of both sexes then Trump is a damn fool. Good leaders place people according to their ability to perform the job assigned. There are some jobs women do better than men and some where men are needed. The sexes are not the same neither are they equal regardless of how badly people want them to be.
And Trump has a history of misogynistic comments (deregarory comments on epople because they are women).
45d
@divegeester saidYou actually need any?
That’s a bit of a strawman considering you haven’t provided any proof yourself that he is a misogynist.