Go back
US 2nd Amendment - what does it say?

US 2nd Amendment - what does it say?

Debates

CapaCrapa

Joined
10 May 22
Moves
769
Clock
29 May 22

@shavixmir

1000 deaths by active shooters in 20 years?

Last year Chicago had almost 1000 homicides just in that city alone.

Yall ignore the real gun problem and focus on the minority active shooters? 🤷
Focus your attention on the real gun problem which is inner city violence.
After you fix that...then you can go after the people who have legal guns and lessen those.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22644
Clock
29 May 22

@shavixmir said
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081

So, for every 100 US citizens, there are 120 guns…
Next country up is… Yemen… with 52 guns per 100 citizens.

In 2020: 45.222 gun deaths. 54% of them suicide (well, no loss there then, I guess).

According to the FBI, there were 345 "active shooter incidents" in the United States between 2000-2020, resulting in more ...[text shortened]... e hounds of hell, but take their bloody passports away… leave them on their rock to rot in moronity.
We have gun collectors in this country so the relevance to how many guns is questionable. Our 2nd amendment makes that possible. I know someone that own dozens of guns. Some people own hundreds.

The problem is that they are in too few hands. If that petty teacher that sacrificed her life being a human shield had a gun with her she could have done something about it.

https://www.rt.com/news/556272-west-virginia-woman-averts-mass-shooting/

We also have people here that are incompetent. Even when they prepare they don't really prepare. It often blows my mind people are this stupid.

https://nationalfile.com/uvalde-school-police-held-active-shooter-drill-just-two-months-before-massacre/

The reality is we have the 2nd amendment. As long as we have it more people should be armed. Not more guns, more people carrying guns. The alternative is repealing or altering the 2nd amendment. That is what you want, right?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22644
Clock
29 May 22

@capacrapa said
@shavixmir

1000 deaths by active shooters in 20 years?

Last year Chicago had almost 1000 homicides just in that city alone.

Yall ignore the real gun problem and focus on the minority active shooters? 🤷
Focus your attention on the real gun problem which is inner city violence.
After you fix that...then you can go after the people who have legal guns and lessen those.
If we focus on the real problem (inner city violence) and reduce gun deaths that way why would we want to lessen legal guns? That will just prove guns are not the problem.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89790
Clock
29 May 22

@capacrapa said
@shavixmir

1000 deaths by active shooters in 20 years?

Last year Chicago had almost 1000 homicides just in that city alone.

Yall ignore the real gun problem and focus on the minority active shooters? 🤷
Focus your attention on the real gun problem which is inner city violence.
After you fix that...then you can go after the people who have legal guns and lessen those.
No… it’s 1000 deaths in mass shooting incidents.
It’s 54.000 gun related deaths in 2020 alone.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22644
Clock
29 May 22

@shavixmir said
No… it’s 1000 deaths in mass shooting incidents.
It’s 54.000 gun related deaths in 2020 alone.
How does that compare to automobile deaths?
Stop being a drama queen. More people have died from the gene vaccines.

CapaCrapa

Joined
10 May 22
Moves
769
Clock
29 May 22
1 edit

@metal-brain said
If we focus on the real problem (inner city violence) and reduce gun deaths that way why would we want to lessen legal guns? That will just prove guns are not the problem.
I was explaining to the others that banning or lessening guns from law abiding citizens will only happen after they take the guns away from criminals.

(Probably not going to happen since the Democrats keep letting them out of prison)

CapaCrapa

Joined
10 May 22
Moves
769
Clock
29 May 22

@shavixmir said
No… it’s 1000 deaths in mass shooting incidents.
It’s 54.000 gun related deaths in 2020 alone.
So everyone gets all worked up over 2 percent?

I'm thinking the other 54 thousand deaths are way more important than any mass shooting.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22644
Clock
29 May 22

@capacrapa said
I was explaining to the others that banning or lessening guns from law abiding citizens will only happen after they take the guns away from criminals.

(Probably not going to happen since the Democrats keep letting them out of prison)
You have it so backwards.
You cannot take the guns away from criminals. They don't respect the law, only law abiding citizens do. DUH!

CapaCrapa

Joined
10 May 22
Moves
769
Clock
29 May 22
1 edit

@metal-brain said
You have it so backwards.
You cannot take the guns away from criminals. They don't respect the law, only law abiding citizens do. DUH!
If having an illegal gun means an automatic life sentence do you think criminals would carry them like they do now?

I'm thinking almost all of them wouldn't carry anymore.
Criminals have a brain too...they are not mindless idiots.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22644
Clock
29 May 22

@capacrapa said
If having an illegal gun means an automatic life sentence do you think criminals would carry them like they do now?

I'm thinking almost all of them wouldn't carry anymore.
Criminals have a brain too...they are not mindless idiots.
We need guns because the cops will not protect us.

https://rumble.com/v16efo3-texas-cops-jaw-dropping-responses-to-reporters-questions.html

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89790
Clock
29 May 22

@metal-brain said
How does that compare to automobile deaths?
Stop being a drama queen. More people have died from the gene vaccines.
No they haven’t you fukk muppet.

CapaCrapa

Joined
10 May 22
Moves
769
Clock
29 May 22

@Metal-Brain

I agree.
2A always.

I was arguing with the others because they want to get rid of guns and I told them that won't happen unless the criminals don't have any.
Once the criminals don't have any then regular citizens wouldn't feel the need to have so many.

A law abiding citizen has a right to bear arms.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89790
Clock
29 May 22

@capacrapa said
@Metal-Brain

I agree.
2A always.

I was arguing with the others because they want to get rid of guns and I told them that won't happen unless the criminals don't have any.
Once the criminals don't have any then regular citizens wouldn't feel the need to have so many.

A law abiding citizen has a right to bear arms.
Well, not according to your constitution.

That part you’ve made up.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22644
Clock
31 May 22

@capacrapa said
@Metal-Brain

I agree.
2A always.

I was arguing with the others because they want to get rid of guns and I told them that won't happen unless the criminals don't have any.
Once the criminals don't have any then regular citizens wouldn't feel the need to have so many.

A law abiding citizen has a right to bear arms.
What a lot of people don't want to admit is they would like the 2nd amendment repealed but they know it is an uphill battle they know they will not win so they lie about the 2nd amendment instead.

Tell them to repeal the 2nd amendment. Encourage it. They know they will lose that battle so it gets in their craw every time we tell them to do it.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22644
Clock
31 May 22

@shavixmir said
No they haven’t you fukk muppet.
How does that compare to automobile deaths? How does that compare with VAERS reported deaths?
Stop being a drama queen.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.