Debates
27 Jul 06
Originally posted by sasquatch672So I can't count you as a fellow communist just yet?:'(
Thanks Chanc. Anybody who's read a tiny fraction of my posts knows that I'm unapologetically pro-military. However, I think the mistake that SVW is making is that typical mistake the ultra-right makes...equating disagreement with one's political leaders with treason, which is so laughably absurd and counter to every single principle our country was fo ...[text shortened]...
EDIT: In fact, I'm beginning to wonder whether he even bothered to read my post at all.
Originally posted by sasquatch672I think SVW knows best. There is no longer any need to be ashamed.
Sorry, Red-Tinged One, but no, not a commie, can't think of the circumstances that would make me one.
You might want to try CommunistsAnonymous - they'll give you a 12-step plan to allow you to accept your newly discovered leftwing politics.
Originally posted by sasquatch672Hey. Can I help it is you are stuck on stupid? To remain a Reaganite after the world has aged for 26 years is just plain weird. Never occured to you that you can't be in favor of supporting dictators for oil like we did back then? That is just plain wrong.
I'm so far from left-wing it's ridiculous. SVW would make Genghis Khan look left-wing, except GK was better-looking and a superior fighter.
As to looks... that matters to you a lot, so you worry about it.
Tell me again. You are really in favor of allowing the islamofascists the right to force people to join them or die. Because it costs money to defend "freedom of religion", which to me and you equates to "freedom from religion"? That is what you said with your "get fed up" thread. Right? Freedom vs. Money? If i'm wrong, please tell me how.
Originally posted by treetalkYes. How's your diaper? Your mum ok with you stinking up the world while she's at work in the bedroom? And don't forget to go out and purchase those ten new sponges she told you about. Hers are more than a week old and are starting to really smell now.
You've been well trained, haven't you? 🙄
Originally posted by richjohnsonIt still works. And just because the stupid yeti doesn't know the difference between marxism and communism is kind of the yetis problem. He did equate "freedom of religion" -- a "value" -- to money. How much more marxist can you get? In marxism, ALL "values" are reducible to money, or economy. Do you see "communist" anywhere there Rich?
Don't take it personally, Mike accuses eveybody who disagrees with him of being a communist. I believe he grew up in an era when the 'commies' were the enemy (and a scary one at that), and such tactics were prevalent and successful.
Yours truly,
Another Worn Out Commie
Originally posted by sasquatch672b. -- it's hard to have a balanced budget when you are at war, and your average congress person has the IQ of a balloon.
Mikey! You're back! Ooh, you make me feel all squishy inside!
I'm not defining Reagan by this, but can you tell me why the principles of : a) limited government; b) balanced budget; c) self-reliance; d) individual rights; and e) the rule of law are now antiquated?
You're taking a very small part of my post and transmogrifying it into somet administration to drive our country right off the proverbial cliff.
I don't see how disagreeing over the very fact that you started a thread against MY side in the war on terror can be argued. I just don't agree with your starting what I think is a thread that is against MY views and favors my enemies. You don't see it that way, but you can't make me go away just because you are a good Libertarian.
The most amoral people on earth, by definition, are libertarians.
As to Mike... he has done the same damn, stupid thing as you have done, and I always call him on it. So? I don't run with pack dogs.
Here is my position. I am against islamofascists. Period. Anyone who supports islamofascists is my enemy. The term "beheaders" has been earned by people who kill people for NOT BEING MUSLIM FASCISTS and by all who SUPPORT the killers. I didn't do it. They did. As a good personal responsibility type, you surely see that. svw has never beheaded anyone. The "beheaders" have killed thousands. And try not to be an anal turd literalist. "Beheading" is their advertising meathod on the net. They "behead" few, but they kill thousands. I figure that if they want to invest so much time and energy in advertising to the world that they favor beheading infidels, I will accomodate them by buying into their advert. They are beheaders and they are proud of it. It is no insult to them that I call them what they want the world to see them as.
You see the war in Iraq as an unjust war because of money?
I don't. I see it as a small opening attack in a war that will last the next 80 years. Like the start of most wars, the opening battles are mostly lost to the bad guys. I expect Iraq will be no different. Partly, and in a small way, because of tacit support of the enemy by good intentioned libertarians.
There is a very good reason that we must fight a war that can't be paid for now. The congress is like you. They don't think that we are at war with evil. They think that reaganomics worked then in 1980, so why change. If a single picture of a dead american soldier can't remind you of WHO KILLED HIM... why does it matter. You obviously blame your own country for his death, and by doing so, you hold the beheaders blameless. Or at best, you see "shared blame". I can't see the "shared blame" as you do. So I feel it's my right to let you have it. And I will. It will do no good, but at least you will know how I feel. That's all these forums are about.
Originally posted by StarValleyWyGee, what a stinging attack.
Yes. How's your diaper? Your mum ok with you stinking up the world while she's at work in the bedroom? And don't forget to go out and purchase those ten new sponges she told you about. Hers are more than a week old and are starting to really smell now.
You're not secretly one of 'them', are you? Sympathetic to the dreaded beheaders and Islamofascists?