Go back
Why should the U.S. defend  Ukraine?

Why should the U.S. defend Ukraine?

Debates

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
26 Jan 22
2 edits

@vivify said
https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/22/libya-and-the-myth-of-humanitarian-intervention/

"fifth anniversary week of the U.S.-led Libya intervention"

https://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-us-libya-20140627-story.html

"the United States didn’t do more to mend Libya, since the U.S.-led military campaign had broken the old order."

I've always thought it was agreed the U.S. led a disastrous effort that failed to plan for the recovery of the country.
I believe that interpretation is a result of the common assumption that NATO is subservient to the USA in all things. Can you provide evidence that the USA actually did any leading?

Apologies for long cut and paste:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_military_intervention_in_Libya

21 February 2011: Libyan deputy Permanent Representative to the UN Ibrahim Dabbashi called "on the UN to impose a no-fly zone on all of Tripoli to cut off all supplies of arms and mercenaries to the regime."[40]
23 February 2011: French President Nicolas Sarkozy pushed for the European Union (EU) to pass sanctions against Gaddafi (freezing Gaddafi family funds abroad) and demand he stop attacks against civilians.
25 February 2011: Sarkozy said Gaddafi "must go."[55]
26 February 2011: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 was passed unanimously, referring the Libyan government to the International Criminal Court for gross human rights violations. It imposed an arms embargo on the country and a travel ban and assets freeze on the family of Muammar Al-Gaddafi and certain Government officials.[56]
28 February 2011: British Prime Minister David Cameron proposed the idea of a no-fly zone to prevent Gaddafi from "airlifting mercenaries" and "using his military aeroplanes and armoured helicopters against civilians."[45]
1 March 2011: The US Senate unanimously passed non-binding Senate resolution S.RES.85 urging the United Nations Security Council to impose a Libyan no-fly zone and encouraging Gaddafi to step down. The US had naval forces positioned off the coast of Libya, as well as forces already in the region, including the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise.

19 March 2011: French[73] forces began the military intervention in Libya, later joined by coalition forces with strikes against armoured units south of Benghazi and attacks on Libyan air-defense systems,

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
26 Jan 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@AThousandYoung
NOBODY is launching nukes over Ukraine.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
26 Jan 22
2 edits

This logic of "spheres of influence" for the five veto holding SC members is part of what is behind Russia's current actions i.e. Russia is operating inside it's "Sphere of control" because the USSR was much further west than Russia is

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54597
Clock
26 Jan 22

@vivify said
https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/22/libya-and-the-myth-of-humanitarian-intervention/

"fifth anniversary week of the U.S.-led Libya intervention"

https://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-us-libya-20140627-story.html

"the United States didn’t do more to mend Libya, since the U.S.-led military campaign had broken the old order."

I've always thought it was agreed the U.S. led a disastrous effort that failed to plan for the recovery of the country.
BOO! Found you😱!

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
26 Jan 22
1 edit

@no1marauder said
Gee, I had no idea that this grotesque level of paranoia had survived the fall of the USSR.

The Russians willing and anxious to sweep to the Channel sounds soooooooooooo 1950.
Gee I guess you do not live in Europe so it’s a non issue.
Your level of f you Jack I’m alright is noted .
It’s the Russians who have amassed 125 thousand troops on the border of the Ukraine, it’s the Russians that have demanded in writing a return to the Warsaw Pact demarcation lines in Europe.
Stop denying reality because in reality you just do not care, just admit that you do not care what happens to Europe.

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
29 Jan 22

@vivify said
https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/22/libya-and-the-myth-of-humanitarian-intervention/

"fifth anniversary week of the U.S.-led Libya intervention"

https://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-us-libya-20140627-story.html

"the United States didn’t do more to mend Libya, since the U.S.-led military campaign had broken the old order."

I've always thought it was agreed the U.S. led a disastrous effort that failed to plan for the recovery of the country.
That doesn't really mean anything, though. American commentators to this very day pretend that the USA led the Allied powers in World War II.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
29 Jan 22
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shallow-blue said
That doesn't really mean anything, though. American commentators to this very day pretend that the USA led the Allied powers in World War II.
The difference is that claiming the U.S. led the Allied Forces makes America look heroic, while Libya is generally seen an utter disaster. In other words, Libya is an embarrassment for the U.S., considered Obama's biggest failure.

I doubt saying Libya was U.S.-led was motivated by any kind of nationalism.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Jan 22
1 edit

@kevcvs57 said
Gee I guess you do not live in Europe so it’s a non issue.
Your level of f you Jack I’m alright is noted .
It’s the Russians who have amassed 125 thousand troops on the border of the Ukraine, it’s the Russians that have demanded in writing a return to the Warsaw Pact demarcation lines in Europe.
Stop denying reality because in reality you just do not care, just admit that you do not care what happens to Europe.
I don't live in Europe.

That doesn't mean the level of paranoia you are bleating about Russia's anxiousness to conquer the continent is justified.

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
29 Jan 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
I don't live in Europe.

That doesn't mean the level of paranoia you are bleating
You don't live in Europe, therefore you do not understand that this is not paranoia.

Seriously, marauder, you are way, way out of touch with what is really happening here. You have no bleeding idea what you're pontificating about. No idea whatsoever.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Jan 22
1 edit

@shallow-blue said
You don't live in Europe, therefore you do not understand that this is not paranoia.

Seriously, marauder, you are way, way out of touch with what is really happening here. You have no bleeding idea what you're pontificating about. No idea whatsoever.
Funny, I don't see Euros being shy about giving their opinions regarding matters in this hemisphere.

This type of arrogance seems the last gasp of those who can't support their opinions with facts. NATO has been at least as aggressive as Putin's Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union, attacking countries and staging occupations in areas outside the supposed area that it was formed to defend. Seeing the entire dispute as Russia wearing a big black hat (with Putin an evil mustache twirler) and NATO wearing a pristine white one is childish , no matter where the person who sees it that way is situated.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Jan 22

For a more balanced view of the crisis: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2021-12-28/what-putin-really-wants-ukraine

"it’s crucial to note that Putin has presided over four waves of NATO enlargement and has had to accept Washington’s withdrawal from treaties governing anti-ballistic missiles, intermediate-range nuclear forces, and unarmed observation aircraft. For him, Ukraine is the last stand."

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
29 Jan 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
For a more balanced view of the crisis: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2021-12-28/what-putin-really-wants-ukraine

"it’s crucial to note that Putin has presided over four waves of NATO enlargement and has had to accept Washington’s withdrawal from treaties governing anti-ballistic missiles, intermediate-range nuclear forces, and unarmed observation aircraft. For him, Ukraine is the last stand."
putin is not giving biden his cut of the proceeds from the new pipeline…Ukraine leader is begging US to stay away

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
29 Jan 22
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@AThousandYoung
NOBODY is launching nukes over Ukraine.
Russia has as part of its military doctrine that it will use tactical nuclear weapons if it is losing in a war.

I think I heard that somewhere.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
30 Jan 22
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down



According to the above Belarus has agreed to support Russia in case of war.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.