01 Feb 23
@kilroy70 saidBe careful about mentioning deaths in your family. Some people on here may take offence and think you are lying.
One more time, in case you missed it the 1st time...
"I'll be looking forward to your questions and comments when that happens."
As I said in a previous post, a few recent deaths in the family and making preparations to move to another state prevent me from focusing on chess games. I anticipate starting up again sometime this Spring, after I get settled in.
@the-gravedigger saidIt happens. People die. But I certainly know better than to provide details to a couple of unnamed bubble heads who will pry into and try making "forum gold" from the misfortune of others.
Be careful about mentioning deaths in your family. Some people on here may take offence and think you are lying.
@divegeester said"I’ve been at work all day"
An “entire day”…
I’ve been at work all day, what are you on about?
It’s not trivial, it’s fuking hilarious 😆
Really? Doing what?
Hiding behind the walls of your cubicle and playing video games? Shooting spitwads at your coworkers when the floor supervisor isn't looking? Monitoring video feed from inside the women's restroom, ogling the new intern (male or female or..), looking through the forums at RHP, making chess moves, ogling the new intern?
Oh well, have a productive day 😁
02 Feb 23
@the-gravedigger saidI think Very Rusty's vindictiveness was targeted very specificity at me with regard to my father-in-law's death; I don't think he'll target Kilroy70 in the same way.
Be careful about mentioning deaths in your family. Some people on here may take offence and think you are lying.
02 Feb 23
@fmf said"I don't think he'll target Kilroy70 in the same way."
I think Very Rusty's vindictiveness was targeted very specificity at me with regard to my father-in-law's death; I don't think he'll target Kilroy70 in the same way.
Of course not, and it's because I haven't given him a reason to target me. If I actively worked to demean him and get under his skin then it would be a different story.
02 Feb 23
@kilroy70 saidI haven't had any exchanges with Very Rusty - I haven't addressed him or replied to any of his posts - since March 2022. The stuff about my father-in-law was late last year.
Of course not, and it's because I haven't given him a reason to target me. If I actively worked to demean him and get under his skin then it would be a different story.
02 Feb 23
@kilroy70 saidI'm not going to troll you about deaths in your family. There's nothing in my posting history to justify your insinuation that I would.
It happens. People die. But I certainly know better than to provide details to a couple of unnamed bubble heads who will pry into and try making "forum gold" from the misfortune of others.
@kilroy70 saidYou said all the above to another poster. Are you trying to "demean" him or "get under his skin"?
Really? Doing what?
Hiding behind the walls of your cubicle and playing video games? Shooting spitwads at your coworkers when the floor supervisor isn't looking? Monitoring video feed from inside the women's restroom, ogling the new intern (male or female or..), looking through the forums at RHP, making chess moves, ogling the new intern?
02 Feb 23
@fmf saidFirst of all, your close association with divegester is all that is needed for Rusty to want to bust your chops.
Yoo said all this to another poster. Are you trying to "demean" him?
Secondly, both you and divegeester managed to disrupt a conversation I was having with Kelly Jay on a topic I was interested in pursuing. I haven't forgotten you were a part of that disruptive influence, which brings me to my third point.
That point being, you are not some innocent background shadowy figure when you and Dive are working together with malicious intent... in other words, you are not fooling anyone with any of your self serving self assessments.
But to answer your question, yes. I was having a bit of fun at divegeesters expense...
so what?
Have a nice day 🤗
02 Feb 23
@kilroy70 saidNone of this justifies your insinuation that I would troll you about deaths in your family.
First of all, your close association with divegester is all that is needed for Rusty to want to bust your chops.
Secondly, both you and divegeester managed to disrupt a conversation I was having with Kelly Jay on a topic I was interested in pursuing. I haven't forgotten you were a part of that disruptive influence, which brings me to my third point.
That point being, y ...[text shortened]... intent... in other words, you are not fooling anyone with any of your self serving self assessments.
02 Feb 23
@fmf saidWhy would I think you or anyone else would troll me over deaths of family members?
None of this justifies your insinuation that I would troll you about deaths in your family.
Regardless, if there are trolls ready to pounce I will not be giving out personal information. And if someone wants to keep me talking until I say something he can use, I might just humor him for awhile... until he says something I can use.
Loging out in 3... 2... 1...