@kilroy70 saidI haven't "mangled" anything or misrepresented the clear meaning of your words. As you say, it's still "in full view of everyone".
And when it gets right down to it, you can't even be trusted with relatively innocuous statements... you're able to mangle nearly anything said, and in full view of everyone.
There is nothing in my posting history to suggest that I might exploit "misfortune" in your life, such as you having had relatives pass away, in order to declare it "forum gold".
There was nothing whatsoever "innocuous" about your posting starting at the top of page 32.
@fmf saidPlaying the same stupid victim card over and over won't work. You sound like a man trying to squelch his own guilty conscience.
I haven't "mangled" anything or misrepresented the clear meaning of your words. As you say, it's still "in full view of everyone".
There is nothing in my posting history to suggest that I might exploit "misfortune" in your life, such as you having had relatives pass away, in order to declare it "forum gold".
There was nothing whatsoever "innocuous" about your posting starting at the top of page 32.
It's all just good wholesome fun and jocular forum banter when you are on the attack, isn't it. But heaven forbid if someone comes after you, then it's unjustifiable insinuations.
@kilroy70 saidAs I say, your insinuation that I might troll you about your relatives having died - and now also trying to insinuate that I have a "guilty conscience" - is wholly unjustified and does not constitute "fun and jocular forum banter" at all. Indeed, it's a pretty nasty brand of gaslighting.
Playing the same stupid victim card over and over won't work. You sound like a man trying to squelch his own guilty conscience.
It's all just good wholesome fun and jocular forum banter when you are on the attack, isn't it. But heaven forbid if someone comes after you, then it's unjustifiable insinuations.
@fmf said"The references to Suzianne's reappearance have been frivolous and jocular."
The references to Suzianne's reappearance have been frivolous and jocular. With your stuff insinuating that I might troll you about deceased relatives, you don't seem jocular at all. Indeed, your banter seems pretty unpleasant.
You're able to call them frivolous and jocular because you were not the target.
@kilroy70 saidI am able to call them frivolous and jocular because that's what they simply are. This thread is about how she has gone for good. I posted about how she obviously hasn't.
"The references to Suzianne's reappearance have been frivolous and jocular."
You're able to call them frivolous and jocular because you were not the target.
@kilroy70 saidWow you really have a boner on for me don’t you!
"I’ve been at work all day"
Really? Doing what? Monitoring video feed from inside the women's restroom, ogling the new intern (male or female or..),, ogling the new intern?
- Video feeds from the women’s restroom!!
- Ogling the new intern (posted twice) !!
Well well Kilroy, what do we see about you from your post.
@earl-of-trumps saidDo you mean a life like you flirting with Toruun in the Tavern thread where you pretend it’s a real place and the two of you are having real drinks…?
Hahaha,, yeah, funny.
Only I am not laughing at the "Suzianne login fiasco", I am laughing at the total fool
that thinks this fiasco is an unbelievably significant part of anyone's life.
Get a life, for gawd's sake.
Or is the sort of life where you believe there are “aliens buzzing around in the earths atmosphere” and where you hang out on “unexplained mysteries” websites and chat with other saddos about conspiracies… is that the sort of “significant” life you lead?
Bring it on Trump supporter. 😉
@Earl-of-Trumps LOL
@suzianne saidGood to see you back posting with your usual quality.
It is with regret that I announce to you all, that after 6965 days, I am leaving Red Hot Pawn.
For reference here’s your post to @booger from 24 hours ago in debates:
@Suzianne said
You are easily one of the dumbest mf-ers on this site.
And racist AF.
But I repeat myself