@kilroy70 saidNear the top of the previous page you said, in answer to The Gravedigger's comment about a poster [he was referring to Very Rusty] trolling me about deaths in my family, you were explicit; you said:
Why would I think you or anyone else would troll me over deaths of family members?
"It happens. People die. But I certainly know better than to provide details to a couple of unnamed bubbleheads who will pry into and try making "forum gold" from the misfortune of others."
Clearly, this is an insinuation that I would troll you about deaths in your family. This insinuation may well be mere forum banter on your part, but it is not justified.
02 Feb 23
@kilroy70 saidAs I said, I'm sorry to hear that you've lost family members recently. I lost a few myself in the last year or so.
Regardless, if there are trolls ready to pounce I will not be giving out personal information. And if someone wants to keep me talking until I say something he can use, I might just humor him for awhile... until he says something I can use.
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 27938
@fmf saidIs this how you talk to your family members?
Near the top of the previous page you said, in answer to The Gravedigger's comment about a poster [he was referring to Very Rusty] trolling me about deaths in my family, you were explicit; you said:
"It happens. People die. But I certainly know better than to provide details to a couple of unnamed bubbleheads who will pry into and try making "forum gold" from the misfortune of ...[text shortened]... n your family. This insinuation may well be mere forum banter on your part, but it is not justified.
02 Feb 23
@fmf saidLogged on:
Near the top of the previous page you said, in answer to The Gravedigger's comment about a poster [he was referring to Very Rusty] trolling me about deaths in my family, you were explicit; you said:
"It happens. People die. But I certainly know better than to provide details to a couple of unnamed bubbleheads who will pry into and try making "forum gold" from the misfortune of ...[text shortened]... n your family. This insinuation may well be mere forum banter on your part, but it is not justified.
You are clearly reading more into this than is there. I know nothing about Rusty trolling you, and what Gravedigger actually said to me was:
"Be careful about mentioning deaths in your family. Some people on here may take offence and think you are lying."
What makes you think Gravedigger was talking about you, or that you are one of unnamed bubble heads, unless you believe you must be because... ?
Your oversensitivty to "forum banter" you believe is meant to specifically target you is probably due to your own poorly disguised maliciousness.
@kilroy70 saidWhat makes you think Gravedigger was talking about you
what Gravedigger actually said to me was:
"Be careful about mentioning deaths in your family. Some people on here may take offence and think you are lying."
What makes you think Gravedigger was talking about you, or that you are one of unnamed bubble heads, unless you believe you must be because... ?
Because both he and I know exactly what he is referring to.
@kilroy70 saidWhat makes you think that you are one of unnamed bubbleheads
What makes you think Gravedigger was talking about you, or that you are one of unnamed bubble heads, unless you believe you must be because... ?
Beacause you have referred to me and divegeester ~ and nobody else ~ as "bubbleheads" countless times.
@kilroy70 saidYour oversensitivty to "forum banter" you believe is meant to specifically target you is probably due to your own poorly disguised maliciousness.
Your oversensitivty to "forum banter" you believe is meant to specifically target you is probably due to your own poorly disguised maliciousness.
I haven't been malicious towards you. And nothing in my posting history justifies your insinuation that I would troll you about deaths in your family.
02 Feb 23
@fmf saidI am not Gravedigger, and Gravedigger is not me. If you have an issue with Gravedigger, then maybe you should take this up with...
What makes you think Gravedigger was talking about you
Because both he and I know exactly what he is referring to.
Gravedigger
not Kilroy70
02 Feb 23
@kilroy70 saidNo one is suggesting you "have an issue with The Gravediggger". The meaning and your intent in the exchanges on page 32 could scarcely be clearer. It seems you are now seeking to distance yourself from the insinuations you made.
I am not Gravedigger, and Gravedigger is not me. If you have an issue with Gravedigger, then maybe you should take this up with...
02 Feb 23
@fmf saidI'm sensing you are no longer enjoying our jocular forum banter.
No one is suggesting you "have an issue with The Gravediggger". The meaning and your intent in the exchanges on page 32 could scarcely be clearer. It seems you are now seeking to distance yourself from the insinuations you made.
The only thing I was insinuating was that I do not trust you or dive with personal information.
And when it gets right down to it, you can't even be trusted with relatively innocuous statements... you're able to mangle nearly anything said, and in full view of everyone.
@kilroy70 saidThe references to Suzianne's reappearance have been frivolous and jocular. With your stuff insinuating that I might troll you about deceased relatives, you don't seem jocular at all. Indeed, your banter seems pretty unpleasant.
I'm sensing you are no longer enjoying our jocular forum banter.
@kilroy70 saidIn reply to The Gravedigger you were clearly suggesting that I might try to make "forum gold from the misfortune" of your family members passing away. It's all still there on page 32.
The only thing I was insinuating was that I do not trust you or dive with personal information.