@ghost-of-a-duke saidI think this is where you get a little bit weird, creating a narrative about someone you know very little about, purely for spiteful reasons
I think this is where you get a little bit weird, creating a narrative about someone you know very little about, purely for spiteful reasons. I notice you tend to do this when you are failing to gain traction in a given thread.
And yet you created a weird spiteful narrative about me supposedly using my radio programme to "maliciously" and "deliberately humiliate" you when, as I explained at the time, this had no truth to it whatsoever.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThis is a revealing response.
I would bet good money I am more popular at work than you are sir. In fact, I am certain of it.
And if you are an experienced multilevel line manager my grandad was Lord Lucan.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidDude!
I'll talk you through it again:
1. Endlame makes an obvious joke.
2. Dive, blinded by anything Suzianne related, takes it literally.
3. You follow his lead.
4. When it becomes blindingly apparent it was a joke, and the pair of you look rather 'silly' your spite gene kicks in and you call him a scumbag.
Capital E and L 🤷
@fmf saidThat was a factual account. Shall we go over it again? Will only take 42 pages of exchanges.
I think this is where you get a little bit weird, creating a narrative about someone you know very little about, purely for spiteful reasons
And yet you created a weird spiteful narrative about me supposedly using my radio programme to "maliciously" and "deliberately humiliate" you when, as I explained at the time, this had no truth to it whatsoever.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThere was nothing "malicious" about me putting two of your stories in show 3 and then again in show 4. I hadn't "sabotaged" the show by doing it.
That was a factual account. Shall we go over it again? Will only take 42 pages of exchanges.