04 Sep 16
Originally posted by divegeesterWith me in the past, when his pants were at his ankles (and put there by himself) on more than one occasion, he's taken to asking me if I was sexually abused as a child, insinuated that I was a pedophile, and attributed my criticism of him to my supposed homosexuality. I think it's what he calls "jocular". 😉
Are you again using homosexuality as a sort of childish playground insult Robbie?
Originally posted by FMFI merely drew attention to the fact that you were caught masquerading as a women on a site that allows minors. This is a fact. If you think that is an insinuation that you are a paedophile then that is your affair, not mine. You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children. It simply does not look very good for you regardless of your motivations.
With me in the past, when his pants were at his ankles (and put there by himself) on more than one occasion, he's taken to asking me if I was sexually abused as a child, insinuated that I was a pedophile, and attributed my criticism of him to my supposed homosexuality. I think it's what he calls "jocular". 😉
Perhaps you should stick to banter instead of handing out unsolicited advice on what constitutes proper behaviour Banterman?
04 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf you suspect that I am a pedophile, you should report me to the moderators. It's a serious matter, robbie, and not an appropriate subject for your banter ~ especially when you make the same insinuation over and over and over again.
You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children.
04 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOr else what? Face your banter about sexual abuse, sexual orientation or being a pedophile? Your comments on all these things when they occurred were "unsolicited" too, robbie. 😕
Perhaps you should stick to banter instead of handing out unsolicited advice on what constitutes proper behaviour Banterman?
Originally posted by FMFI have not insinuated anything you are simply making it up that I have and if you don't want it mentioned then you should not bring it up Banterman. It was you who mentioned it, was it not Banterman? Oh dear it seems to have gone from bad to worse for you.
If you suspect that I am a pedophile, you should report me to the moderators. It's a serious matter, robbie, and not an appropriate subject for your banter ~ especially when you make the same insinuation over and over and over again.
04 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOh come on Robbie, you are better than this.
I merely drew attention to the fact that you were caught masquerading as a women on a site that allows minors. This is a fact. If you think that is an insinuation that you are a paedophile then that is your affair, not mine. You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children. It simply does not look ve ...[text shortened]... banter instead of handing out unsolicited advice on what constitutes proper behaviour Banterman?
Originally posted by divegeesterOh come on divegeester your brain-dead master tried to glean some moral leverage out of a subject that he raised and then complained about it being the subject of banter, He's almost as much a dullard as you.
Oh come on Robbie, you are better than this.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf you seriously think that there is any issue whatsoever with me being permitted to be active on internet sites that allow children, you should tell the web site about it immediately. As banter, it's very low grade. I think even you know that.
I have not insinuated anything you are simply making it up that I have and if you don't want it mentioned then you should not bring it up Banterman. It was you who mentioned it, was it not Banterman? Oh dear it seems to have gone from bad to worse for you.
04 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieCalling people homosexuals and pedophiles in order to score points is not good forum etiquette.
Oh come on divegeester your brain-dead master tried to glean some moral leverage out of a subject that he raised and then complained about it being the subject of banter, He's almost as much a dullard as you.
now that 'the heavies', have been dispensed with time to get back to some lighter shades of drool. Ben Affleck smoking through the pain of existence, for Ghost of a Duke whose a big fan.
http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/08/ben-affleck-smoking-through-the-pain-of-existence.html
dig Ghastly one
Originally posted by robbie carrobieA Ben Affleck slideshow. Oh goodie.
now that 'the heavies', have been dispensed with time to get back to some lighter shades of drool. Ben Affleck smoking through the pain of existence, for Ghost of a Duke whose a big fan.
http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/08/ben-affleck-smoking-through-the-pain-of-existence.html
dig Ghastly one
What's to follow, a Tom Hanks montage?
04 Sep 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeI suppose, at least, one can say about you that you don't join in with robbie's "comedy" routines about sex abuse, pedophiles and people being homosexuals! 😛
A Ben Affleck slideshow. Oh goodie.
What's to follow, a Tom Hanks montage?
Originally posted by FMFGee banterman were you masquerading as a women in order to deceive people and got caught? Who brought that up banterman, was it not you? yes it was right up there on the top of the page. Who talks more often about pants down and willys? as far as I can tell it was your lapdog jeeester in this instance? Oh dear there it is in black and white! previous page.
I suppose, at least, one can say about you that you don't join in with robbie's "comedy" routines about sex abuse, pedophiles and people being homosexuals! 😛
and here you are banterman proffering advice on how people should conduct. themselves??? Ouch!