Go back
affect and effect

affect and effect

General

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by divegeester
Are you again using homosexuality as a sort of childish playground insult Robbie?
With me in the past, when his pants were at his ankles (and put there by himself) on more than one occasion, he's taken to asking me if I was sexually abused as a child, insinuated that I was a pedophile, and attributed my criticism of him to my supposed homosexuality. I think it's what he calls "jocular". 😉

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
04 Sep 16
5 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
With me in the past, when his pants were at his ankles (and put there by himself) on more than one occasion, he's taken to asking me if I was sexually abused as a child, insinuated that I was a pedophile, and attributed my criticism of him to my supposed homosexuality. I think it's what he calls "jocular". 😉
I merely drew attention to the fact that you were caught masquerading as a women on a site that allows minors. This is a fact. If you think that is an insinuation that you are a paedophile then that is your affair, not mine. You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children. It simply does not look very good for you regardless of your motivations.

Perhaps you should stick to banter instead of handing out unsolicited advice on what constitutes proper behaviour Banterman?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children.
If you suspect that I am a pedophile, you should report me to the moderators. It's a serious matter, robbie, and not an appropriate subject for your banter ~ especially when you make the same insinuation over and over and over again.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Perhaps you should stick to banter instead of handing out unsolicited advice on what constitutes proper behaviour Banterman?
Or else what? Face your banter about sexual abuse, sexual orientation or being a pedophile? Your comments on all these things when they occurred were "unsolicited" too, robbie. 😕

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
04 Sep 16
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
If you suspect that I am a pedophile, you should report me to the moderators. It's a serious matter, robbie, and not an appropriate subject for your banter ~ especially when you make the same insinuation over and over and over again.
I have not insinuated anything you are simply making it up that I have and if you don't want it mentioned then you should not bring it up Banterman. It was you who mentioned it, was it not Banterman? Oh dear it seems to have gone from bad to worse for you.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I merely drew attention to the fact that you were caught masquerading as a women on a site that allows minors. This is a fact. If you think that is an insinuation that you are a paedophile then that is your affair, not mine. You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children. It simply does not look ve ...[text shortened]... banter instead of handing out unsolicited advice on what constitutes proper behaviour Banterman?
Oh come on Robbie, you are better than this.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
04 Sep 16
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by divegeester
Oh come on Robbie, you are better than this.
Oh come on divegeester your brain-dead master tried to glean some moral leverage out of a subject that he raised and then complained about it being the subject of banter, He's almost as much a dullard as you.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
04 Sep 16
1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I have not insinuated anything you are simply making it up that I have and if you don't want it mentioned then you should not bring it up Banterman. It was you who mentioned it, was it not Banterman? Oh dear it seems to have gone from bad to worse for you.
If you seriously think that there is any issue whatsoever with me being permitted to be active on internet sites that allow children, you should tell the web site about it immediately. As banter, it's very low grade. I think even you know that.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Oh come on divegeester your brain-dead master tried to glean some moral leverage out of a subject that he raised and then complained about it being the subject of banter, He's almost as much a dullard as you.
Calling people homosexuals and pedophiles in order to score points is not good forum etiquette.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I have not insinuated anything you are simply making it up....
Did you not say this ~ "You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children" ~ in a post earlier on this page?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
04 Sep 16
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

now that 'the heavies', have been dispensed with time to get back to some lighter shades of drool. Ben Affleck smoking through the pain of existence, for Ghost of a Duke whose a big fan.

http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/08/ben-affleck-smoking-through-the-pain-of-existence.html

dig Ghastly one

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
04 Sep 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
now that 'the heavies', have been dispensed with time to get back to some lighter shades of drool. Ben Affleck smoking through the pain of existence, for Ghost of a Duke whose a big fan.

http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/08/ben-affleck-smoking-through-the-pain-of-existence.html

dig Ghastly one
A Ben Affleck slideshow. Oh goodie.

What's to follow, a Tom Hanks montage?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
04 Sep 16
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
A Ben Affleck slideshow. Oh goodie.

What's to follow, a Tom Hanks montage?
Cant you feel Bens pain, there he is in London, on his birthday, with his estranged wife and three kids driving him insane? I gotta admit Tom Hanks is pretty bland though.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
A Ben Affleck slideshow. Oh goodie.

What's to follow, a Tom Hanks montage?
I suppose, at least, one can say about you that you don't join in with robbie's "comedy" routines about sex abuse, pedophiles and people being homosexuals! 😛

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
04 Sep 16
8 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
I suppose, at least, one can say about you that you don't join in with robbie's "comedy" routines about sex abuse, pedophiles and people being homosexuals! 😛
Gee banterman were you masquerading as a women in order to deceive people and got caught? Who brought that up banterman, was it not you? yes it was right up there on the top of the page. Who talks more often about pants down and willys? as far as I can tell it was your lapdog jeeester in this instance? Oh dear there it is in black and white! previous page.

and here you are banterman proffering advice on how people should conduct. themselves??? Ouch!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.