affect and effect

affect and effect

General

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
04 Sep 16
2 edits

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
He apologized,why not just let it go?

What's the point exactly in dredging it up in yet another thread? (Like you've done here with the earlier post. - 'With me in the past...' ). Clearly those things are not true about you. Why would you want them resurrected?
I apologise to you Ghost, these stoney faced killjoys don't know where to get off. They seem intent on making everyone as miserable as them.

Starmer is a liar

More in my profile

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
118768
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Actually it was your master FMF who brought it up, shall I find the page number for you? So your statement is demonstrably false and that makes you. . . . . a liar. Ouch and here you are pontificating about morality to others, get a grip and have a good look at yourself, your hypocrisy is odious.
You repeatedly insinuate that FMF Is a paedophile, it's is a disgusting thing to say and you should be ashamed of yourself.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
04 Sep 16
2 edits

Originally posted by divegeester
You repeatedly insinuate that FMF Is a paedophile, it's is a disgusting thing to say and you should be ashamed of yourself.
I have done nothing of the sort, he brought it into thread, shall I show you where? meh reality doesn't interest you, you believe nothing but your own propaganda even when its demonstrably false.

You seem incapable of seeing how you come across to others, perhaps you need to see a specialist? I suggest Dr. Ghost of a Duke, he has experience in dealing with people who have difficulty adapting to normal human behaviour and who spend their time moralising over others when their own deficiencies are rather glaring. Then again perhaps there is no medication for rampant hypocrisy?

Starmer is a liar

More in my profile

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
118768
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I have done nothing of the sort, he brought it into thread, shall I show you where? meh reality doesn't interest you, you believe nothing but your own propaganda even when its demonstrably false.

You seem incapable of seeing how you come across to others, perhaps you need to see a specialist? I suggest Dr. Ghost of a Duke, he has experience in dea ...[text shortened]... and who spend their time moralising over others when their own deficiencies are rather glaring.
But I'm not talking about this thread, I'm talking about you repeatedly insinuating that FMF is a danger to children and just to score a few cheap points. You are a disgrace Robbie, your leaders down at Kingdom Hall would be ashamed of you.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
04 Sep 16
2 edits

Originally posted by divegeester
But I'm not talking about this thread, I'm talking about you repeatedly insinuating that FMF is a danger to children and just to score a few cheap points. You are a disgrace Robbie, your leaders down at Kingdom Hall would be ashamed of you.
here are your words.

You repeatedly insinuate that FMF Is a paedophile.

FMF brought the subject into this thread, I did not making your claim that I repeatedly insinuate that he is a paedophile demonstrably false. I never mention it unless he himself brings it up.

your statement is simply a bare faced lie and you have been caught lying, AGAIN!

Starmer is a liar

More in my profile

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
118768
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
here are your words.

You repeatedly insinuate that FMF Is a paedophile.

FMF brought the subject into this thread, I did not making your claim that I repeatedly insinuate that he is a paedophile demonstrably false. I never mention it unless he himself brings it up.

your statement is simply a bare faced lie and you have been caught lying, AGAIN!
No it isn't a lie.

Whether or not FMF reminded you (as I am doing now) about how you repeatedly bring this up is irrelevant; you do repeatedly bring it up. This thread is not representative of how often you do or do not bring it up, you bring it up with a regularity which is well documented by the frequency forum contributors. So stop wriggling.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
04 Sep 16
5 edits

Originally posted by divegeester
No it isn't a lie.

Whether or not FMF reminded you (as I am doing now) about how you repeatedly bring this up is irrelevant; you do repeatedly bring it up. This thread is not representative of how often you do or do not bring it up, you bring it up with a regularity which is well documented by the frequency forum contributors. So stop wriggling.
It appears to me that you are the one squirming when presented with certain incontrovertible facts.

FMF brought the subject into a public forum and mentioned me personally. Why he did so if he does not want it discussed remains known only to him. If you have any problems with how many times FMF brings the subject into public forum then I suggest you ask him to refrain from doing so but every time I am referenced I will point out the facts.

The thread is representative on nothing more than you attempting to vilify other people on nothing more than a trumped up bare faced lie and being caught out. It was FMF that brought the subject up, not me, it was FMF that started with his insinuations of paedophilia, not me and he does so far more many times than I have ever mentioned it despite your now demonstrable lie. My goodness you are bust.

Tell the forum the last time I brought the subject up and with what frequency? or eat your words, AGAIN.

Starmer is a liar

More in my profile

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
118768
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
It appears to me that you are the one squirming when presented with certain incontrovertible facts.

FMF brought the subject into a public forum and mentioned me personally. Why he did so if he does not want it discussed remains known only to him. If you have any problems with how many times FMF brings the subject into public forum then I suggest y ...[text shortened]... forum the last time I brought the subject up and with what frequency? or eat your words, AGAIN.
Nonsense. Whether or not FMF reminded you of your regular insinuations is completely irrelevant. You DO keep bringing it up. Perhaps if you are willing to state here and now that you will never mention it again then the matter can be dropped.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by divegeester
Nonsense. Whether or not FMF reminded you of your regular insinuations is completely irrelevant. You DO keep bringing it up. Perhaps if you are willing to state here and now that you will never mention it again then the matter can be dropped.
So I take it you have nothing but your own hot air with which to substantiate your now ludicrous claims of frequency, oh dear, intellectually and morally bankrupt.

Starmer is a liar

More in my profile

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
118768
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
So I take it you have nothing but your own hot air with which to substantiate your now ludicrous claims of frequency, oh dear, intellectually and morally bankrupt.
As you are so indignant over this outrageous claim of mine, will you here and now promise that you will never mention it again?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
04 Sep 16
1 edit

Originally posted by divegeester
As you are so indignant over this outrageous claim of mine, will you here and now promise that you will never mention it again?
I am not indignant, I merely wish you would lighten up a little.

Starmer is a liar

More in my profile

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
118768
04 Sep 16
1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I am not indignant, I merely wish you would lighten up a little.
Will you here and now, promise that you will never mention it again?

Unless you are willing to do so, you kind of look a little disingenuous. Don't you 🙂

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by divegeester
Will you here and now, promise that you will never mention it again?

Unless you are willing to do so, you kind of look a little disingenuous. Don't you 🙂
Sorry no deals, if FMF mentions me by name or in reference then I am under duress to defend myself. If FMF does not mention it then neither shall I.

Starmer is a liar

More in my profile

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
118768
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Sorry no deals, if FMF mentions me by name or in reference then I am under duress to defend myself. If FMF does not mention it then neither shall I.
I'm not asking for a deal Robbie, I'm asking you to be unequivocal that you will never mention it again. I accept that if FMF brings it up then you have to respond, but you don't have to reiterate the insinuations, do you?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
04 Sep 16

Originally posted by divegeester
I'm not asking for a deal Robbie, I'm asking you to be unequivocal that you will never mention it again. I accept that if FMF brings it up then you have to respond, but you don't have to reiterate the insinuations, do you?
Sorry dude, my offer is on the table, take it and feel easy.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.